If every crude observation you made here were about blacks, you would be censored and booted off this board. Why is it OK in your view to talk like this? |
In fairness, WASPs love being talked about like this. it makes them feel like being a WASP is still relevant. |
You don’t know enough people and are not a member of any of the clubs. Don’t speculate from the sidelines, it’s pure foolishness. |
I know a lot of elite wealthy old money people and they all had a negative view of 2 of the 3 clubs above. True. In recent 10-15 years there has been a dramatic swing of Maga/GOP families - most yes from places not deemed traditionally as elite. You are holding on to the past. Things have changed. Noone views those clubs as elite anymore. |
You couldn't be more wrong. |
No you don’t. You are making things up. You are neither a member nor do you know members. There has always been a mix of a lot of political stripes at all these clubs but one was started as a firmly Republican operation by the Republicans in charge at the time, Team Lincoln. The other was started by one of the more odious characters who was a Democrat. Still, the shifts you imagine reflect no reality. Beyond that, the only historical local wealth (not the largely transient wealth that had outposts here because it is the capital) were doctors and doctors still dominate at one of the clubs you are slighting via the opinions of your “contacts.” |
You deal in 3rd party speculation and traffic in the unsubstantiated opinions of others. |
| I went to Exeter and a 7 sisters school, am Indian by heritage. The only club I semi-frequent is Costco. |
No 2 neighbors and my in laws belong and have all expressed displeasure with the trajectory. They rarely use it. We along with other friends - all Ivy alums and old Northeast/New England old money have all decided to join other clubs and are quite happy there. We did not apply to above clubs. |
Because OP’s noted groups weren’t historically and systemically oppressed, moron. |
All bs and you know it. |
Wow. Just remarkable, honestly. We’re supposed to believe (with a straight face) that the great American aristocracy, the people who insist they don’t even see class, who float through life on a cloud of Vineyard Vines and inherited equity — are actually running a whisper-campaign intelligence service straight out of John le Carré…for pickleball membership? Let’s just pause for a moment. You’re saying...and I want to make sure I have this right, that no one is ever blackballed for no reason. Of course not. Heaven forbid. It’s always because someone heard something from someone else, rumor delivered with the solemnity of a priest giving last rites, whispered at a luncheon, over a tuna salad, by someone who “can’t say more.” And somehow this tiny group of people who insist they’re the most polite, conflict-averse population on Earth are also operating a secret tribunal that ruins people’s reputations without ever saying a word out loud. That seems…totally normal. Not weird at all. And then we get to the best part: the moral math. Affairs? Racism? An actual assault allegation? Nope, that’s not the problem. The problem is whether the girl involved has the right last name. Whether her great-grandfather donated an organ, not to a hospital, but to the squash court. This isn’t etiquette. This isn’t tradition. This is what happens when a small group of people confuse “being discreet” with “being unaccountable.” And here’s the punchline: you frame it like it’s some grand, ancient WASPian code of honor. But what you’re really describing is a closed circuit of gossip and fear that punishes anyone outside the clan — and protects anyone inside it. If that’s the system, fine. Own it. Say: “We keep out people we don’t like because that’s how our club works.” But don’t pretend it’s noble, or principled, or that it’s about preserving standards. It’s about power — and the people who have it trying desperately to hold on to it. And frankly? It shows. |
DP. Well written! This is exactly it. They are looking for reasons to keep people they don’t like out while allowing in people that have really terrible reputations. I can think of several members that have abhorrent over the top reputations and they were allowed in without a second thought. Rumors and gossip to keep people out is the only power they have and it is actually quite sad. Let them have it. |
I have been associated for years and decades through my family and there have been some changes but there are still descendants of those who have been seen as “leading families” for generations. There are also people who are descendants of Tuxedo Park and other northern establishment areas. What has changed is that there are now more Catholics and Jewish people at these places. The overall memberships are probably more accomplished and certainly more wealthy ( all of DC is) than in the past too. What I suspect is that the pp’s neighbors and in-laws are cut from the in-bred racist cloth that did dominate those clubs years and years ago and hence the “trajectory” doesn’t work for them anymore. |
Nope. The neighbors are liberal and elite Northeastern and New England families. They don’t like the blackballing and group mentality described above to not allow certain people in while at the same time easily supporting others who have much worse behavior. They also don’t like the Maga takeover. Maga is a different sort of politic. |