So you support all of Trump's shitty, destructive policies that are hurting millions of Americans just because you are upset about trans issues. Got it. |
You are avoidant and reduced to calling names, because you know I am right about how wrong this is, and how unethical the Democrats have been. Also, I don’t have a problem with adults undergoing medicated transition. Their body, their choice. However, I have an extremely serious problem with what Democrats have supported doing to children. Everyone with any ethics at all should have a problem with it. And that’s why people think Trump is good, even though he’s an obviously corrupt and horrible person: because he knows this is wrong and he says it. |
So the Democrats are now the party of “well, you gotta destroy a few children to make an omelet?” And you still want to believe you are on the side of good? |
Hello? Still no MAGAs able to defend Trump’s threat today - revoking Rosie O’Donnel’s citizenship. Tell us why it’s OK for POTUS to revoke the citizenship of someone born in New York simply because they don’t him. This is OK and what you stand for? |
I take a very skeptical view of transgender medication and do oppose surgery in children. But it would be doctor directed and mediated, and it’s for cases where the alternative is death because of the high suicide risk. We administer all sorts of psychiatric and hormonal medication to children and teens for mental health issues, even birth control hormones for acne, so puberty delay hormones are of a similar vein. |
Dont you realize they are never going to speak up about prejudices they all hold? They have shown the world what they stand for: nothing. So they fall for anything. And justify it. It makes them feel safe to support Cult 45. |
But some of us have been brainwashed to believe Democrats seek to destroy children with exploratory surgeries. Are you saying we were lied to or weren't given the whole truth? That's unfathomable. |
The thing is, on this issue I agree with you that dissent within the democrat party has been stomped by a very engaged lobby. But Gavin Newsom, Andy Beshear, and Biden himself have tried, and then been stomped. That problem of a highly motivated lobby is something both sides suffer from. But only the republicans have chosen to disregard ethics of their leaders. And they are still beholden to powerful lobbies. |
OK so no one able to defend Trump’s threat to revoke the citizenship of someone born in New York simply because they don’t like him? There is no defense, that’s why. You people worship a clown who doesn’t not care about anyone but himself. |
MAGA is a cult of stupids
Red state voters same |
To me, one hint that a lot of this stuff is pageantry is how they fake-decline the pronouns, like there's so much right to explaining how to us third-person singular masculine or feminine pronouns. "Here, just so you have it handy, the object form is 'him.'" {I nod thoughtfully and record it in my notebook.} Additionally, the common practice of doing "he/him/his" and "she/her/hers" is grammatically really weird. The only way these three pronouns make sense is if the order they go in is subject/object/independent possessive pronoun. But it makes no sense to provide an independent possessive pronoun (which is used only infrequently) while not listing the dependent possessive pronoun (which is used all the time). The reason, of course, is because people don't want to say "she/her/her" or "she/her/her/hers", so they just go with what sounds good and pretend it's oh so grammatically rigorous.
I will have unimaginable respect for the first person I see whose email signature block says "he (but no declensions please)." I will buy he a drink! |
What is this mumble jumble? |
It was either The Atlantic or The New York Times recently that reported this suicide risk is fictional. |
Trump is good because he sacrificed billions and nearly his life to help the country. |
There are tens of millions of idiots out there who agree with you. There are billions of people in the world laughing at your ignorance. |