Dr. Broquard/Lafayette

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.

Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.

In our case - she did not care about providing FAPE for my child. There were records around this.
She talked a good talk when she met you - but given the # of families who have won cases during her tenure this was systematic and a part of her leadership. Winning a case is not easy. I have gone through the process multiple times and I do not wish this on anyone.
To get to the point that you are filing a complaint, your child has seriously suffered with what the school has provided. To win a case - it is not about not crossing a "T" or dotting an "i"

Different PP, and agree. Going through a due process case is not a cake walk, and reaching that point is the result of services not being adequately provided by the school system. Previously, it was a fairly easy thing to obtain a private placement through DCPS, but no longer. This is not a case of vilifying Dr Broquard, but rather being told the school is providing everything they need to provide even when no academic progress occured. Filing for due process was the a final step in advocating for what your child needs according to federal law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.

Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.

In our case - she did not care about providing FAPE for my child. There were records around this.
She talked a good talk when she met you - but given the # of families who have won cases during her tenure this was systematic and a part of her leadership. Winning a case is not easy. I have gone through the process multiple times and I do not wish this on anyone.
To get to the point that you are filing a complaint, your child has seriously suffered with what the school has provided. To win a case - it is not about not crossing a "T" or dotting an "i"

Different PP, and agree. Going through a due process case is not a cake walk, and reaching that point is the result of services not being adequately provided by the school system. Previously, it was a fairly easy thing to obtain a private placement through DCPS, but no longer. This is not a case of vilifying Dr Broquard, but rather being told the school is providing everything they need to provide even when no academic progress occured. Filing for due process was the a final step in advocating for what your child needs according to federal law.

But in our case, she was fully aware of the discussions before we filed. She could have stepped in and done something and multiple points in the process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.

Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.

In our case - she did not care about providing FAPE for my child. There were records around this.
She talked a good talk when she met you - but given the # of families who have won cases during her tenure this was systematic and a part of her leadership. Winning a case is not easy. I have gone through the process multiple times and I do not wish this on anyone.
To get to the point that you are filing a complaint, your child has seriously suffered with what the school has provided. To win a case - it is not about not crossing a "T" or dotting an "i"

Different PP, and agree. Going through a due process case is not a cake walk, and reaching that point is the result of services not being adequately provided by the school system. Previously, it was a fairly easy thing to obtain a private placement through DCPS, but no longer. This is not a case of vilifying Dr Broquard, but rather being told the school is providing everything they need to provide even when no academic progress occured. Filing for due process was the a final step in advocating for what your child needs according to federal law.

But in our case, she was fully aware of the discussions before we filed. She could have stepped in and done something and multiple points in the process.

Oh, she was aware in our case as well! As the LEA from DCPS Central Office later said, he thinks it's a case of "not on my watch".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.

Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.

In our case - she did not care about providing FAPE for my child. There were records around this.
She talked a good talk when she met you - but given the # of families who have won cases during her tenure this was systematic and a part of her leadership. Winning a case is not easy. I have gone through the process multiple times and I do not wish this on anyone.
To get to the point that you are filing a complaint, your child has seriously suffered with what the school has provided. To win a case - it is not about not crossing a "T" or dotting an "i"

Different PP, and agree. Going through a due process case is not a cake walk, and reaching that point is the result of services not being adequately provided by the school system. Previously, it was a fairly easy thing to obtain a private placement through DCPS, but no longer. This is not a case of vilifying Dr Broquard, but rather being told the school is providing everything they need to provide even when no academic progress occured. Filing for due process was the a final step in advocating for what your child needs according to federal law.

But in our case, she was fully aware of the discussions before we filed. She could have stepped in and done something and multiple points in the process.

Oh, she was aware in our case as well! As the LEA from DCPS Central Office later said, he thinks it's a case of "not on my watch".

I'm a pp who also won a due process hearing against Lafayette/Dr. B. She served as the LEA rep for most of our IEP meetings; she absolutely knew what she was doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Given the fact that Dr. Broquard has been announced as the next principal of Miner, and Lafayette has only announced a meeting for community input into the next principal, it sure seems like Dr. Broquard is leaving voluntarily.

That’s quite a leap, but whatever the reason parents and teachers are celebrating. Doesn’t really matter why she’s going as long as she’s gone!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely does not care about all kids. Maybe she cared about your kid and that is great, but many parents (MANY) don’t feel the same way. And is it normal for principals to have so many lawsuits filed against them?!? I bet my Childs principal hasn’t had any…

[Anonymous]

Carrie Broquard is a perfect example of Dr. Jeckyll/Ms. Hyde. She knows when to smile and what to say, but eventually, your true self appears. She is still a principal because she is protected by Instructional Sups like Caruthers and Ferebee. There is no way a principal who has said and done the things she's done to children and educators should still hold their position. I've heard the comments she's made about ND children, Black women on staff, and others. I've witnessed her emotionally and mentally beat down staff members. I've witnessed her use strawman and gaslighting tactics to destroy her staff. She's a monster!

She has a cookie-cutter approach to teaching, which doesn't allow educators to grow in their craft or differentiate for ND students. They're petrified to stray from the script for fear of getting ineffective on IMPACT. Children aren't one size fits all, so how can this be effective? It won't be effective at Miner. The majority of LES students come with the resources to counter this approach. Miner students will suffer because of her tactics.

The Racial Equity Committee conducted a few surveys and the results are eye-opening. She's a micromanaging bully, plain and simple. I wouldn't wish her on my worst enemy.

Signed,

Former LES teacher and parent

[Anonymous]

Another thread that shows just how obnoxious Lafayette parents are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't understand the difference between "special treatment" and "special needs" that's on you. And blanket claim "she's bad with students who are not NT period" just shows how some critics try to unfairly project their individual feelings onto the masses. I think Dr. B is a hardworking, caring educator. She cares about ALL the kids - every single one, regardless of ability or who their parents are. And yes, it is unfortunate so much money meant for education ends up getting spent on litigation. But that's not Dr. B's fault - she upholds DC policy and law; she doesn't make it. And how have those lawsuits gone? Honest question.

She absolutely did not care about my autistic child. And the hearing officer in our due process case agreed.

Unlikely that a hearing officer found the principal "did not care." But great that you were able to get a successful outcome for your child! Dr. B has faults like everyone else, but no need to vilify her. She is a mom too. Of course she cares about children.

In our case - she did not care about providing FAPE for my child. There were records around this.
She talked a good talk when she met you - but given the # of families who have won cases during her tenure this was systematic and a part of her leadership. Winning a case is not easy. I have gone through the process multiple times and I do not wish this on anyone.
To get to the point that you are filing a complaint, your child has seriously suffered with what the school has provided. To win a case - it is not about not crossing a "T" or dotting an "i"

Different PP, and agree. Going through a due process case is not a cake walk, and reaching that point is the result of services not being adequately provided by the school system. Previously, it was a fairly easy thing to obtain a private placement through DCPS, but no longer. This is not a case of vilifying Dr Broquard, but rather being told the school is providing everything they need to provide even when no academic progress occured. Filing for due process was the a final step in advocating for what your child needs according to federal law.

But in our case, she was fully aware of the discussions before we filed. She could have stepped in and done something and multiple points in the process.

Oh, she was aware in our case as well! As the LEA from DCPS Central Office later said, he thinks it's a case of "not on my watch".

I'm a pp who also won a due process hearing against Lafayette/Dr. B. She served as the LEA rep for most of our IEP meetings; she absolutely knew what she was doing.

She absolutely knew!

[Anonymous]

If there are people planning to leave LES, understand that it has nothing to do with their love for Carrie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another thread that shows just how obnoxious Lafayette parents are.

Seriously? That's your takeaway from this thread?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another thread that shows just how obnoxious Lafayette parents are.

Yes, how dare parents of kids with disabilities want their public school to provide FAPE! So obnoxious!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another thread that shows just how obnoxious Lafayette parents are.

Yes, how dare parents of kids with disabilities want their public school to provide FAPE! So obnoxious!

Also, to add, that was definitely Dr. B's attitude. She thought Lafayette parents of kids with disabilities should just pay for tutors/move to private school instead of expecting the school to provide an appropriate education. I wonder how she will handle it when Miner parents demand FAPE but can't as easily supplement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Carrie Broquard is a perfect example of Dr. Jeckyll/Ms. Hyde. She knows when to smile and what to say, but eventually, your true self appears. She is still a principal because she is protected by Instructional Sups like Caruthers and Ferebee. There is no way a principal who has said and done the things she's done to children and educators should still hold their position. I've heard the comments she's made about ND children, Black women on staff, and others. I've witnessed her emotionally and mentally beat down staff members. I've witnessed her use strawman and gaslighting tactics to destroy her staff. She's a monster!

She has a cookie-cutter approach to teaching, which doesn't allow educators to grow in their craft or differentiate for ND students. They're petrified to stray from the script for fear of getting ineffective on IMPACT. Children aren't one size fits all, so how can this be effective? It won't be effective at Miner. The majority of LES students come with the resources to counter this approach. Miner students will suffer because of her tactics.

The Racial Equity Committee conducted a few surveys and the results are eye-opening. She's a micromanaging bully, plain and simple. I wouldn't wish her on my worst enemy.

Signed,

Former LES teacher and parent

As a former Lafayette parent, this is exactly what I heard from multiple teachers over the years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Carrie Broquard is a perfect example of Dr. Jeckyll/Ms. Hyde. She knows when to smile and what to say, but eventually, your true self appears. She is still a principal because she is protected by Instructional Sups like Caruthers and Ferebee. There is no way a principal who has said and done the things she's done to children and educators should still hold their position. I've heard the comments she's made about ND children, Black women on staff, and others. I've witnessed her emotionally and mentally beat down staff members. I've witnessed her use strawman and gaslighting tactics to destroy her staff. She's a monster!

She has a cookie-cutter approach to teaching, which doesn't allow educators to grow in their craft or differentiate for ND students. They're petrified to stray from the script for fear of getting ineffective on IMPACT. Children aren't one size fits all, so how can this be effective? It won't be effective at Miner. The majority of LES students come with the resources to counter this approach. Miner students will suffer because of her tactics.

The Racial Equity Committee conducted a few surveys and the results are eye-opening. She's a micromanaging bully, plain and simple. I wouldn't wish her on my worst enemy.

Signed,

Former LES teacher and parent

I know nothing of Dr. B. But you have described exactly two other DCPS principals that I know well. This is what DCPS wants and expects, that's why there are no consequences.