This Arlington bungalow for 2.2M?

Anonymous
https://redf.in/zAgD1Y

Just couldn’t understand
Anonymous
That’s a split-level, not a bungalow.
Anonymous
It's the 3/4 acre lot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's the 3/4 acre lot.


Holy. We’re on a 7000 sq ft lot in a way less nice part of N Arlington and our land alone is still assessed at $850K. This very well might be underpriced for the lot size and location.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's the 3/4 acre lot.


Holy. We’re on a 7000 sq ft lot in a way less nice part of N Arlington and our land alone is still assessed at $850K. This very well might be underpriced for the lot size and location.


The land is assessed at $1,144,000 and the house $404,000 for a total of $1,548,000.
Anonymous
Lots of land, but the backyard is not flat, and I would not want to live directly across from a school.
Anonymous
Interesting house. Huge lot but not that useable and could never be split apart to build a second home on it, which is very valuable if that is the case.

Across from a school would be terrible.
Anonymous
This was purchased by a flipper -- "3667 N HARRISON STREET LLC" -- for $1.5 million last year. It's an ugly split-level and doesn't really seem like it's worth more than that.
Anonymous
I think this is a great location for a family and the house is nicely done inside. Walkable to your entire k-12 experience is worth a lot as a family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:That’s a split-level, not a bungalow.


+1
Anonymous
Reminds me of the Brady House for some reason
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This was purchased by a flipper -- "3667 N HARRISON STREET LLC" -- for $1.5 million last year. It's an ugly split-level and doesn't really seem like it's worth more than that.


Yeah the finishes are not great for that price.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This was purchased by a flipper -- "3667 N HARRISON STREET LLC" -- for $1.5 million last year. It's an ugly split-level and doesn't really seem like it's worth more than that.


These one-off LLCs are a big red flag to me. But I guess buyers just don’t care enough to not buy houses where the previous owner is a shell company against which you probably have no recourse if something goes wrong.
Forum Index » Real Estate
Go to: