+1 for how long that took! |
OMG this post was amazing. 100% agree on Oakton sports parents. The one I know has a superstar kid in middle school sports. It's going to be a rude awakening when they get to high school and realizes they are not as good as the people a foot taller than them. This kid could be a superstar at KAA but mommy is all in on Oakton so they'll be average there. |
Always great to see so many people I loathe sniping at each other. |
YES - this is what we are running into at my kid's school. Parents of like grades 4+ really want to stay at Oakton, but parents with K-3 prefer Western. |
Meren got visibly upset. |
The following opt-in language was apparently added last night (that’s why they had to suspend the 48 hour notification requirement): and the following enrollment plan will be implemented: For SY26-27. Grades 9 and 10 will be opt-in; for SY27-28, grades 9, 10, and 11 will be opt-out; and for SY28-29, grades 9, 10, 11, and 12 will be firm boundary. Meren was furious about this last minute change and wanted to strike them out. Her motion failed. Instead they decided to remove only SY2027 and SY2028 details. |
She was just upset she couldn't drag her feet as much as she wanted. All she ever does is try to inhibit progress. |
Meren sent and email out that said that the school wouldn’t open next year and then backtracked in her FB comments to say that she meant that the first year would be opt in. She is doing her damndest to stop this. Fox Mill parent here, just to be transparent. I think that there is pressure from SLHS families to keep Floris and Fox Millat SLHS. I think that there are a good number of fox Mill families writing her that they want to move, but I know not everyone does. I think the loud screams to not move Crossfield are creating a scenario where Fox Mill moves and Meren knows that she has constituents that won’t be happy with that. She also has pressure to not allow the Vienna folks from being moved to a different HS. I suspect that she knows that she is losing one, if not both, of those arguments. |
The Crossfield screamers are the worst. And yes, I'm a Crossfield parent and would love for my kid to go to the new high school. |
Same! I think the big problem is that they are a bunch of SAHMs with too much time on their hands. I don't have time to post over and over again and write a million AI-generated letters to the school board. I sent my letters once. Maybe I'll send them again, but at this point, I am resigned to the fact that because of these people, my kid is going to have to move from Carson to Franklin for 8th grade and go to Oakton for high school when there are now FIVE high schools closer to our home. And my younger child who is in AAP won't even get to to Carson for AAP because by the time he's in middle school, they will have eliminated AAP Centers. |
Meren attempts to run blockades on anything that benefits schools other than her South Lakes pyramid. If she had any sense she'd go after the Westbriar/IB Marshall island for Sunrise Valley. The 10 moved to Colvin Run lived off Route 7 and were already Cooper/Langley [fact FFM rep didn't know or couldn't figure out independently.] Plus could pick up some other Colvin Run/Langley and top of the odd Oakton ES feed. Replacement products for changes of Fox Mill 100% or a new Fox Mill after appropriate boundary changes with Crossfield. Maybe the level of screamers is why FCPS stuck the non contiguous boundary schools Oakton and Langley at the same meeting. Then you have the Timber Lane Mclean screamers. Mclean is still in dire straits and that crew would move Chesterbrook to Langley to keep Mclean. Better scoping on elementary boundaries and middle/high school feeds would have solved many issues but Thru and Reid didn't do that. |
No one at Timber Lane has ever suggested moving Chesterbrook from McLean to Langley. No one. All they asked for was to stay at McLean, and it appears that FCPS will make the sensible decision to move the Spring Hill kids at McLean to Langley instead, which will eliminate the split feeder there and finally assign a portion of Tysons to Langley. That was Janie Strauss’s original plan back in 2018 after Langley was expanded to almost 2400 seats but it was delayed, first because the School Board was already toying with the idea of a county-wide review and then because Elaine Tholen blocked it to appease her Great Falls neighbors. |
So? I used Chesterbrook as an example since scenario 4 still leaves Mclean overcapacity. 115% including the modular which was relocated NOT new. Chantilly and Centreville have "ancient" modulars installed in 2005. Same as Robinson which had about 3000 HS pre the decision to install a modular. We went to the meetings on Mclean held at Langley and Mclean in 2019. The public suggested move outs to Langley and other schools including Herndon and Falls Church. Those 2 did not have the capacity that will be available in 2026-27. Frankly some SPAs at Timber Lane should be moved to Shrevewood/Marshall and the proposed Shrevewood move should remain at Timber Lane and the whole school at Falls Church. |
|
The reason this is all convoluted is because the facility is not ready to be a fully functioning traditional HS. If it was they would be able to draw firm boundaries and place 9th and 10th grade with optional 11th in the building for next year.
Instead we getting a half baked plan of "opt-in" that will have many unintended consequences, most of which haven't even been thought of or discussed yet. All because several members of the school board and the superintendent made early statements about KAA being "turnkey" and a "great deal". This is a terrible way to open a school. It puts the entire western part of the school district in an unknown situation for multiple years all because our leaders are too proud to admit they spoke too soon and need a single school year to make some changes to the building and get a firm plan on where the boundaries will be. Might be the poorest example of leadership I've seen and this board and superintendent are frequently doing less than desirable things on the leadership front. |
This is very frustrating. No other high school seems to have their own personal advocate on the School Board fighting only for what they think is ideal for one particular school (do they?). |