|
Amherst College
Barnard College Bowdoin College Claremont McKenna College Colby College Grinnell College Hamilton College Harvey Mudd College Middlebury College Pomona College Swarthmore College Williams College Brown University California Institute of Technology Carnegie Mellon University Columbia University Cornell University Dartmouth College Duke University Emory University Georgetown University Harvard University Johns Hopkins University Massachusetts Institute of Technology New York University Northwestern University Princeton University Rice University Stanford University Tufts University Tulane University University of Chicago University of Pennsylvania University of Southern California Vanderbilt University Washington University in St. Louis Yale University Categories of College Selectivity https://share.google/AI4xco3w504txRzma |
|
Since this was part of the criteria, this is dumb:
“AND possess an average composite ACT (25%tile) score of at least 30 or an average combined SAT (25%tile) score of at least 1370.” |
| Who cares? “Most selective” just means “uses ED and other forms of yield protection to manipulate acceptance rate.” Is that really what you’re looking for in a college? |
| Of the LACs, only three — Barnard, Grinnell and Swarthmore — are not NESCACs or Claremonts. |
| I’m genuinely curious why people continue to pay attention to rankings or any sort of "list". What do they actually represent? |
In this case, colleges for which applicants must be especially well qualified to have a chance of admission and for which even qualified applicants may find admission challenging. |
| might as well up 25th percentile to 1500 |
Exactly! Taking 80% of the class ED makes Chicago on the list. But that selectivity is a scam. |
Barron's has long placed colleges into similarly defined categories (College Transitions has several), which can be helpful to counselors and students in developing suitable lists of colleges to research further. |
Perhaps, but wouldn't that mean we're seeing schools like Northeastern in this list? I agree that it's not worth caring about "most selective" but I also think people lean too heavily on ED and yield protection as easy ways to dismiss schools they don't favor. Personally, I'd opt for fit - both academic and social - over prestige. |
| Mmmmk this is common knowledge to everyone on DCUM right? Like zero new names on this list. This is the It’s A Reach For Everyone list of colleges. |
+100 |
| Why does this list not follow acceptance rates? |
For consideration, schools must have acceptance rates of less than 15%. Standardized scoring profiles also are considered. The list is not ranked. |
| Where does this list pull its data from? |