Locking threads

[Anonymous]

I think people are purposely posting inappropriate or off topic comments to ensure certain threads are shutdown as a way to prevent discussion. It’s silly to see in the Fashion thread but it feels like they are doing this as a form of censorship or control in the thread about Mamdani’s wife. Is there no way to just post a warning and block them for 24 hours rather than give in to their goal of shutting down the conversation altogether?

[Anonymous]

I agree.

[Anonymous]

You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

OP, I haven’t trashed her. But in a fashion thread that is fair game. It’s not appropriate to talk politics in the Beauty forum in a thread about fashion. You can trash her politics all you want….in the political forum. You can trash her style all you want in the beauty forum. This isn’t hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, I haven’t trashed her. But in a fashion thread that is fair game. It’s not appropriate to talk politics in the Beauty forum in a thread about fashion. You can trash her politics all you want….in the political forum. You can trash her style all you want in the beauty forum. This isn’t hard.

Meant to say, I’m the OP of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, I haven’t trashed her. But in a fashion thread that is fair game. It’s not appropriate to talk politics in the Beauty forum in a thread about fashion. You can trash her politics all you want….in the political forum. You can trash her style all you want in the beauty forum. This isn’t hard.

And are you just now deciding those will be the rules, after spending pages and pages trashing not only Usha Vance’s clothes but also her husband and politics? How convenient!

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I think people are purposely posting inappropriate or off topic comments to ensure certain threads are shutdown as a way to prevent discussion. It’s silly to see in the Fashion thread but it feels like they are doing this as a form of censorship or control in the thread about Mamdani’s wife. Is there no way to just post a warning and block them for 24 hours rather than give in to their goal of shutting down the conversation altogether?

I try to remove inappropriate posts and keep the threads open. That's what I did in the Rama Duwaji. At times, it's a hopeless task and I just have to give up.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

The Usha-bots are really getting out of hand. What the hell are you doing in this thread? What the hell were you doing the Rama Duwaji thread? Go start your own thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

The level of vitriol directed at Usha Vance on the Trump women fashion thread is so over-the-top that it’s been called out and reported multiple times. You are correct that she never dresses in a way that merits discussion at all - she looks completely normal and appropriate.

However, there are certain posters who have made it their mission to call her “haggard, unkempt, sloppy” - when any observer can see she is none of those things. Not to mention all of the seriously inappropriate political posts about the Vances that have thankfully been deleted.

Now we have a fashion thread about Rama Duwaji in which any criticism about HER is met with utter disdain and hostility by the very same people who make it their mission to tear Usha Vance apart - for NO reason. And who call anyone who defends her “friends and family,” or Usha herself.

So forgive me if I find all of this beyond annoying and hypocritical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

The level of vitriol directed at Usha Vance on the Trump women fashion thread is so over-the-top that it’s been called out and reported multiple times. You are correct that she never dresses in a way that merits discussion at all - she looks completely normal and appropriate.

However, there are certain posters who have made it their mission to call her “haggard, unkempt, sloppy” - when any observer can see she is none of those things. Not to mention all of the seriously inappropriate political posts about the Vances that have thankfully been deleted.

Now we have a fashion thread about Rama Duwaji in which any criticism about HER is met with utter disdain and hostility by the very same people who make it their mission to tear Usha Vance apart - for NO reason. And who call anyone who defends her “friends and family,” or Usha herself.

So forgive me if I find all of this beyond annoying and hypocritical.

But what if people genuinely find Usha haggard, unkempt, and sloppy? People are allowed to have opinions that aren't your opinion, you know that, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

The level of vitriol directed at Usha Vance on the Trump women fashion thread is so over-the-top that it’s been called out and reported multiple times. You are correct that she never dresses in a way that merits discussion at all - she looks completely normal and appropriate.

However, there are certain posters who have made it their mission to call her “haggard, unkempt, sloppy” - when any observer can see she is none of those things. Not to mention all of the seriously inappropriate political posts about the Vances that have thankfully been deleted.

Now we have a fashion thread about Rama Duwaji in which any criticism about HER is met with utter disdain and hostility by the very same people who make it their mission to tear Usha Vance apart - for NO reason. And who call anyone who defends her “friends and family,” or Usha herself.

So forgive me if I find all of this beyond annoying and hypocritical.

But what if people genuinely find Usha haggard, unkempt, and sloppy? People are allowed to have opinions that aren't your opinion, you know that, right?

So if people genuinely find Rama Duwaji “haggard, unkempt, and sloppy,” you understand that they’re allowed those opinions too - right? I noticed someone posted something similar and those comments were deleted. So interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean, you’ve spent months trashing Usha Vance’s appearance and style, saying she is “unkempt, lazy, slovenly, haggard, has terrible undereye shadows, dresses poorly,” etc etc. - but now you want to silence anyone criticizing Rama Duwaji?

Sorry, hypocrite. You started this brand of trash talking. Deal with it.

I don't get how you have time for this. Is this like a sports-type thing for you? Like, "oh no, they're trashing my girl on team red, I have to trash team blue now!!!"

What is going on with you?

Just calling out the utter hypocrisy. And now, of course, you’ll pretend you have no idea what I could possibly be talking about when no doubt you are one of the worst offenders when it comes to trashing Usha Vance.

No, I definitely understand what you're saying because I think Usha Vance dresses so boring she doesn't actually merit discussion. However, why is "justice for Usha" even your thing? Out of everything going on in the world, this is what strikes you as important? Really???

The level of vitriol directed at Usha Vance on the Trump women fashion thread is so over-the-top that it’s been called out and reported multiple times. You are correct that she never dresses in a way that merits discussion at all - she looks completely normal and appropriate.

However, there are certain posters who have made it their mission to call her “haggard, unkempt, sloppy” - when any observer can see she is none of those things. Not to mention all of the seriously inappropriate political posts about the Vances that have thankfully been deleted.

Now we have a fashion thread about Rama Duwaji in which any criticism about HER is met with utter disdain and hostility by the very same people who make it their mission to tear Usha Vance apart - for NO reason. And who call anyone who defends her “friends and family,” or Usha herself.

So forgive me if I find all of this beyond annoying and hypocritical.

But what if people genuinely find Usha haggard, unkempt, and sloppy? People are allowed to have opinions that aren't your opinion, you know that, right?

So if people genuinely find Rama Duwaji “haggard, unkempt, and sloppy,” you understand that they’re allowed those opinions too - right? I noticed someone posted something similar and those comments were deleted. So interesting.

I'm not monitoring any of these threads to this level so I will take your word for it. But I also don't understand why you think bad mouthing one woman magically creates justice for the other. That's weird. Your whole fixation on this is really weird. Even Jeff is calling you Usha-bot. Maybe that is a clue when the moderator has a name for you that you have gone over the deep end?