Do you own an AR15?

[Anonymous]

It’s the most popular rifle in the US with about 24 million being built. Wondering if any of my fellow educated urban elites happen to own one.

[Anonymous]

My husband does

[Anonymous]

I don’t but would like to.

[Anonymous]

No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

[Anonymous]

DH and I are former military and not anti-gun. That said, we both strongly believe nobody outside the military (and a few specialized police units) should own a weapon like that. Ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

The government will never be weaponized against the people, so your argument is invalid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DH and I are former military and not anti-gun. That said, we both strongly believe nobody outside the military (and a few specialized police units) should own a weapon like that. Ever.

That's a logical fallacy, argument from authority. I believe you are former military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

The government will never be weaponized against the people, so your argument is invalid.

Are you new here? Check the Politics and Metro DC forums.

[Anonymous]

No. I don't know anyone who does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

The government will never be weaponized against the people, so your argument is invalid.

Are you new here? Check the Politics and Metro DC forums.

Oh yeah, I must have forgotten that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

The government will never be weaponized against the people, so your argument is invalid.

The government and the people are supposed to be the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

And that shows you don't know how Life works. If the military cannot access weapons of war, you will soon not have a country. Peace exists because countries show they can defend themselves. But only as a last resort. Allowing the general public to use tanks and missiles also means you will soon not have a country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. We're a hunting family and we do not approve of such a class of weapons. They should not be available to civilians or retired law enforcement.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people should never have special rights beyond the people.

The government will never be weaponized against the people, so your argument is invalid.

Have you been downtown this past week.

[Anonymous]

My dad did. He was a collector.