Don't use AI for relationships questions

[Anonymous]

When you have free time try asking any of the AI platforms ChatGPT etc relationship questions. It's incredible these systems always give you the "politically" correct answer. I ask chatGPT about women doing the majority of the child rearing, many of the women here won't like the answer it gave me.

I hope our kids aren't going to turn to these systems for help. There needs to be transparency on the training data because the answers are clearly meant not to offend anyone. The answers are very detached from the rear world.

[Anonymous]

ChatGPT learns about you and skews answers to what you want.

What did you prompt it and what was the response?

[Anonymous]

I thought this would be about privacy concerns since your questions go into the training data set.

I didn't think it would be about the fact that ChatGPT skews politically correct/woke/whatever we call it these days.

[Anonymous]

I asked: What are your thoughts about women doing the majority of the child rearing?

Answer from Chatgpt:
That’s a thoughtful question with deep social, cultural, and personal dimensions. Here are a few key perspectives to consider:

1. Historically Rooted, But Evolving
Traditionally, in many societies, women have taken on the bulk of child-rearing responsibilities due to deeply ingrained gender roles. These roles were often shaped by economic structures, religious beliefs, and lack of opportunities for women outside the home.

However, these norms have been shifting. More women are working full-time, and more fathers are involved in hands-on parenting. In some families, especially where both parents work, a more balanced or even reversed division of labor has emerged.

2. Unequal Burden
When women do the majority of child-rearing by default (rather than by choice), it can reinforce gender inequality. It may limit their career progression, personal development, or financial independence. It can also leave men less experienced in nurturing roles and children without the full involvement of both parents.

3. Choice and Partnership
The most sustainable and empowering approach is one based on shared responsibility and choice. If a woman wants to take on more child-rearing duties, and it works well for the family, that’s valid. But it shouldn’t be assumed or expected solely based on gender.

4. Cultural and Economic Factors
In some communities or households, structural factors (like lack of paid parental leave, high childcare costs, or workplace inflexibility) make it more likely that women will take on more of the parenting. Policy changes—like paid paternity leave and flexible work arrangements—can help families share the load more evenly.

Summary:
There’s nothing inherently wrong with women doing most of the child-rearing if it’s their choice and works for everyone involved. The problem arises when it’s an unspoken expectation or results in long-term inequality. Ideally, child-rearing should be seen as a shared responsibility that reflects the strengths, goals, and situations of each family—not outdated assumptions about gender.

Would you like to explore how this affects careers or relationships specifically?

[Anonymous]

^^ I should add, i am not the OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you have free time try asking any of the AI platforms ChatGPT etc relationship questions. It's incredible these systems always give you the "politically" correct answer. I ask chatGPT about women doing the majority of the child rearing, many of the women here won't like the answer it gave me.

I hope our kids aren't going to turn to these systems for help. There needs to be transparency on the training data because the answers are clearly meant not to offend anyone. The answers are very detached from the rear world.

So get the AI advice, and do the opposite of what it says then.

[Anonymous]

I don’t willingly use or engage with (aka help develop) AI, but thanks OP, you’re right.

[Anonymous]

South Park figured this out a couple years ago when Stan started using AI to help him communicate with Wendy...did not end well.