
My mom is in her late 70s and just applied for Social Security. She worked her whole life, earned about $75K a year, and paid into the system for decades. My dad passed away over 15 years ago in his early 70s, made over $200K a year, and never collected a dime.
Now she’s being told she only gets one benefit — hers or his, whichever is higher. Not both. So all the money she paid in is just gone. If this were a 401(k), she’d have access to everything she earned. Instead, the government keeps it. It’s infuriating. She should be getting both benefits. Instead, the government pockets tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars they both paid in. Honestly, I would’ve rather not been forced to pay into this broken system at all. Let people save for themselves. This whole thing feels like a scam. We need to stop pretending Social Security is working — it’s not. It’s robbing people who did everything right. |
You don't understand how it works. Or you are a Musk Troll. |
Your dad could have collected it starting at age 62. I don’t understand your complaint. |
The whole point is to have a social safety net that doesn’t rely on people saving for themselves. Are you just going to let people starve in the streets? |
Social security is a bad return on investment for some and a good return on investment for others. No one knows which group they are in until the end. |
On your logic, your mom shouldn’t be entitled to your dad’s much higher payment because that was his money…not hers. I am failing to see how your mom is being cheated in this scenario nor why you are complaining. Seems like the fair answer is she gets hers only. |
If your dad was not married noone would collect on his contributions. That is the way insurance works |
+1 |
Your mother should have applied for your dad’s SS as soon as he passed away. She missed out on over 15 years of benefits because she didn’t research her benefits. The system isn’t broken. |
Who should get the money my dad put in all his life? If not my mom then who? |
or rather who gets all the money my mom put in? This is outrageous. |
SS gives a person a stream of money for one person. What’s happening with your mom is fine because SS isn’t a savings bank. |
Right? OP's dad could have taken it, but chose to wait. Which is fine. But it's all a gamble. He might also have known he wouldn't last that long, so he didn't take it so he ensured his wife got as high of a pay out as possible. (Each year you wait to take your benefits your payment increases by about 8%, as I recall.) And agreed. SSI is a safety net that is for the good of those who can't or aren't responsible enough to save. For every person who could take the money and invest wisely, there are probably 100 or more who would take it and waste it. |
It's only a problem because your mom and dad made really good salaries.
Why didn't your dad "collect a dime" on his social security when he could have started collecting at age 65? Why did he wait until his early 70s and never collect? Sounds like bad planning on his part. Your mom collecting on your dad's much more generous SS benefit sounds quite helpful. What is your complaint again OP? That people who made 275 a year who were in their 60s and 70s (and didn't need money enough to even start SS at 65!) couldn't have been given even more money post retirement? |
+2 So many people are bitter about the government but they always like the part that benefits them. How will you feel when the government cuts your mom's benefit because they'll means test it more and your mom might have other income due to being part of a $275K HHI household? What about your dad's parents who probably got more out of Soc. Sec. than they paid in? Did you or your parents ever get a mortgage deduction? Why did you deserve that? Why should renters subsidize your good fortune of owning a house during peak years for real estate appreciation. |