Biden pardons Hunter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Republicans are ready to prosecute gun offenses seriously. I am 100% on board and would personally drive Hunter back to jail myself but they used to miss a scapegoat for a law that they don't even want enforced. No one in the history of the US has been prosecuted for this crime and the only reason he is being prosecuted is because of his last name. Looking at some of the people Trump pardoned I have nothing but understanding for why Biden did this

If they started looking into the background of everyone who filled out a 4473 who also did drugs and lied about it, they would end up with millions of people going to jail. I personally know of at least a dozen "legal" gun owners who I know to have done various kinds of drugs.

While I believe you, I think it’s important to distinguish between trying a drug here or there and being so permanently off your face addicted that you’re desperate enough to snort or shoot up anything. People in the latter scenario (like Hunter) are at high risk of committing armed robbery to get money for more drugs (if you’re not already rich from illegally selling access to your powerful father) or doing dumb things like leaving weapons around for other people like children to find.

LOLOLOL "oh but that's different" as you scramble to defend everyone else who committed the same crime as Hunter. Sorry but there is no difference under the law.

Major fail on your part there.

DP but it actually is. This crime is never prosecuted unless the gun purchased was used in crime. It’s never a solo charge.

Hunter never used that gun to commit a crime.
It was a solo charge in Hunter's case, because that's all they had and they insisted DoJ follow through with it.

That's what makes it politically-motivated. They went after Hunter and punished him for crimes in ways that the average gun owner wouldn't have been.

The average gun owner doesn’t write about his crimes in a book and profit from the sales of that book. Hunter basically dared the feds to prosecute him.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone claiming that HB was NOT the subject of a Republican witch hunt are full of crap.

True. Lying on a background check and being late with taxes are typically both fairly minor issues for which people are rarely sent to prison. On the surface, it looks like DOJ overkill. However, look a little deeper and you see a very corrupt family. In all likelihood, China and other actors have been using Hunter to enrich the Biden family. By issuing such an expansive and all inclusive pardon, Joe Biden sought to shut down further inquiry into the sources of the Biden family wealthy - after all, Joe Biden has very famously been nothing more than a train commuting public servant for 50 years. And yet he and has family are enormously wealthy. No doubt the incoming Trump administration will be keen to shine the spotlight on Biden corruption and malfeasance. The expansive pardon was issued to try to derail further investigation into the sources of Biden family wealth.

You're beating a dead horse with "in all likelihood" crap that was already investigated to death. To remind you, the House Republicans already spent millions of taxpayer dollars investigating the whole laptop issue, the "10 for the big guy" claims, the supposed Biden bribes and China and Ukraine deals filling Joe's coffers - and found NOTHING. All they got was that Hunter had a drug problem and lied on his 4473 and was sloppy with his taxes. That's it. Yet you STILL have these lingering delusions of supposed corruption "if you only look deeper" - except, they already DID look deeper. If that corruption ACTUALLY existed, the millions already spent by the House Republicans on investigating the Bidens would have uncovered it.

At this point you're like Geraldo Riviera thinking Al Capone's ill-gotten riches are still hidden away behind a vault door. There's nothing there.

Won’t stop the idiots from pushing their BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Republicans are ready to prosecute gun offenses seriously. I am 100% on board and would personally drive Hunter back to jail myself but they used to miss a scapegoat for a law that they don't even want enforced. No one in the history of the US has been prosecuted for this crime and the only reason he is being prosecuted is because of his last name. Looking at some of the people Trump pardoned I have nothing but understanding for why Biden did this

If they started looking into the background of everyone who filled out a 4473 who also did drugs and lied about it, they would end up with millions of people going to jail. I personally know of at least a dozen "legal" gun owners who I know to have done various kinds of drugs.

While I believe you, I think it’s important to distinguish between trying a drug here or there and being so permanently off your face addicted that you’re desperate enough to snort or shoot up anything. People in the latter scenario (like Hunter) are at high risk of committing armed robbery to get money for more drugs (if you’re not already rich from illegally selling access to your powerful father) or doing dumb things like leaving weapons around for other people like children to find.

LOLOLOL "oh but that's different" as you scramble to defend everyone else who committed the same crime as Hunter. Sorry but there is no difference under the law.

Major fail on your part there.

DP but it actually is. This crime is never prosecuted unless the gun purchased was used in crime. It’s never a solo charge.

Hunter never used that gun to commit a crime.
It was a solo charge in Hunter's case, because that's all they had and they insisted DoJ follow through with it.

That's what makes it politically-motivated. They went after Hunter and punished him for crimes in ways that the average gun owner wouldn't have been.

Do you even listen to yourself?

Biden’s DOJ engaged in a politically motivated prosecution of his son?
Really?

[/quote
No. The GOP house did. Once the DOJ found something, they are between a rock and a hard place on charges. If they don’t charge him, it gives the appearance of special treatment.

Why is the GOP house responsible for what the DOJ found in its investigations? Make this make sense!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Forgetting the political implications, Hunter turned his brother's widow whom he was having sex with into a crack addict. People celebrating him getting off yet again for his degeneracy have never had to deal with a relative with addiction.

He’s an absolute scumbag that deserves jail.

[Anonymous]

As Democrats on here attempt dangerous yoga moves to defend the Biden crime family, how about they attempt to explain how Hunter Biden was named as a VP of a Ukrainian Oil Company to begin with at the same exact time his father became VP of the USA and what his qualifications are for that position, while at the same time no one knows who "10% for the Big Guy is" ?

If there is really nothing, then why a pardon all the way back to January 2014? And covering anything that is beyond what he was charged with?

It's the old tale of we all know he's dirty, and the fight is to break through the insulation that he and his crime family have surrounded themselves with.

If 12 Democrats were on the jury, they would've acquitted Al Capone too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Forgetting the political implications, Hunter turned his brother's widow whom he was having sex with into a crack addict. People celebrating him getting off yet again for his degeneracy have never had to deal with a relative with addiction.

Regardless of political beliefs, Hunter Biden is a a genuinely horrible human being. Not even the worst addicts are taking their dead brothers wives down with them. Hunter Biden is real scum.

[Anonymous]

The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Republicans are ready to prosecute gun offenses seriously. I am 100% on board and would personally drive Hunter back to jail myself but they used to miss a scapegoat for a law that they don't even want enforced. No one in the history of the US has been prosecuted for this crime and the only reason he is being prosecuted is because of his last name. Looking at some of the people Trump pardoned I have nothing but understanding for why Biden did this

If they started looking into the background of everyone who filled out a 4473 who also did drugs and lied about it, they would end up with millions of people going to jail. I personally know of at least a dozen "legal" gun owners who I know to have done various kinds of drugs.

While I believe you, I think it’s important to distinguish between trying a drug here or there and being so permanently off your face addicted that you’re desperate enough to snort or shoot up anything. People in the latter scenario (like Hunter) are at high risk of committing armed robbery to get money for more drugs (if you’re not already rich from illegally selling access to your powerful father) or doing dumb things like leaving weapons around for other people like children to find.

LOLOLOL "oh but that's different" as you scramble to defend everyone else who committed the same crime as Hunter. Sorry but there is no difference under the law.

Major fail on your part there.

DP but it actually is. This crime is never prosecuted unless the gun purchased was used in crime. It’s never a solo charge.

Hunter never used that gun to commit a crime.
It was a solo charge in Hunter's case, because that's all they had and they insisted DoJ follow through with it.

That's what makes it politically-motivated. They went after Hunter and punished him for crimes in ways that the average gun owner wouldn't have been.

Do you even listen to yourself?

Biden’s DOJ engaged in a politically motivated prosecution of his son?
Really?

You are confused and haven't been reading the thread. House Republicans, not DoJ, are who spent millions of dollars investigating Hunter. THEY are the ones who came up with the info on him lying on his 4473, not DoJ. They handed that over to DoJ who merely said "OK" and entered the docket into the legal system resulting in his conviction. It wasn't DoJ spending tons of time and money on investigating him, it wasn't DoJ leading the politically motived witch hunt, it was the Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

Really, who cares?

I don't. Biden is a lame duck who will spend his last few years eating ice cream and hanging out with his dogs and will have virtually zero influence on the political future of the US. It's really bizarre that the MAGAs are so worked up about him and feeling so threatened by him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

Really, who cares?

I don't. Biden is a lame duck who will spend his last few years eating ice cream and hanging out with his dogs and will have virtually zero influence on the political future of the US. It's really bizarre that the MAGAs are so worked up about him and feeling so threatened by him.

Because investigating and prosecuting the Bidens might affect the culture of corruption that exists.

We need to get to the bottom of what happened and who did what.

Turning a blind eye doesn’t do that and encourages this behavior to continue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

Really, who cares?

I don't. Biden is a lame duck who will spend his last few years eating ice cream and hanging out with his dogs and will have virtually zero influence on the political future of the US. It's really bizarre that the MAGAs are so worked up about him and feeling so threatened by him.

Similar to how Democrats under Biden couldn't let Trump go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

Really, who cares?

I don't. Biden is a lame duck who will spend his last few years eating ice cream and hanging out with his dogs and will have virtually zero influence on the political future of the US. It's really bizarre that the MAGAs are so worked up about him and feeling so threatened by him.

We impeached a president in order to hide his business dealings for which he received a 10 year pardon. Not sure why you are even wasting time posting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As Democrats on here attempt dangerous yoga moves to defend the Biden crime family, how about they attempt to explain how Hunter Biden was named as a VP of a Ukrainian Oil Company to begin with at the same exact time his father became VP of the USA and what his qualifications are for that position, while at the same time no one knows who "10% for the Big Guy is" ?

If there is really nothing, then why a pardon all the way back to January 2014? And covering anything that is beyond what he was charged with?

It's the old tale of we all know he's dirty, and the fight is to break through the insulation that he and his crime family have surrounded themselves with.

If 12 Democrats were on the jury, they would've acquitted Al Capone too.

Baby, tell us what Burisma got from Biden.
Just a quick sentence boiling it down to what they got.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, the Bidens are headed out into the wild blue yonder, never to be heard from again. Why the obsession? You've got your man coming into the White House in a month. Celebrate. Prepare. Leave the Bidens alone.

Really, who cares?

I don't. Biden is a lame duck who will spend his last few years eating ice cream and hanging out with his dogs and will have virtually zero influence on the political future of the US. It's really bizarre that the MAGAs are so worked up about him and feeling so threatened by him.

Similar to how Democrats under Biden couldn't let Trump go.

Yes except Trump was running for president again, remember?

Anyway. MAGA is trash, you guys still won, blah blah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Republicans are ready to prosecute gun offenses seriously. I am 100% on board and would personally drive Hunter back to jail myself but they used to miss a scapegoat for a law that they don't even want enforced. No one in the history of the US has been prosecuted for this crime and the only reason he is being prosecuted is because of his last name. Looking at some of the people Trump pardoned I have nothing but understanding for why Biden did this

If they started looking into the background of everyone who filled out a 4473 who also did drugs and lied about it, they would end up with millions of people going to jail. I personally know of at least a dozen "legal" gun owners who I know to have done various kinds of drugs.

While I believe you, I think it’s important to distinguish between trying a drug here or there and being so permanently off your face addicted that you’re desperate enough to snort or shoot up anything. People in the latter scenario (like Hunter) are at high risk of committing armed robbery to get money for more drugs (if you’re not already rich from illegally selling access to your powerful father) or doing dumb things like leaving weapons around for other people like children to find.

LOLOLOL "oh but that's different" as you scramble to defend everyone else who committed the same crime as Hunter. Sorry but there is no difference under the law.

Major fail on your part there.

DP but it actually is. This crime is never prosecuted unless the gun purchased was used in crime. It’s never a solo charge.

Hunter never used that gun to commit a crime.
It was a solo charge in Hunter's case, because that's all they had and they insisted DoJ follow through with it.

That's what makes it politically-motivated. They went after Hunter and punished him for crimes in ways that the average gun owner wouldn't have been.

Do you even listen to yourself?

Biden’s DOJ engaged in a politically motivated prosecution of his son?
Really?

You are confused and haven't been reading the thread. House Republicans, not DoJ, are who spent millions of dollars investigating Hunter. THEY are the ones who came up with the info on him lying on his 4473, not DoJ. They handed that over to DoJ who merely said "OK" and entered the docket into the legal system resulting in his conviction. It wasn't DoJ spending tons of time and money on investigating him, it wasn't DoJ leading the politically motived witch hunt, it was the Republicans.

You are completely unhinged.

House Republicans delivered to Biden’s DOJ a bs case and Biden’s DOJ prosecuted his son anyway? And a jury convicted him? But the case was still bs?