Schedule F Memo is Out
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memorandum%20re%20Schedule%20Policy%20Career%20Guidance%2001-27-2025.pdf
It is very broad. My position def falls within. Sigh. [Edit by Admin: The same folks who are supposed to fix the government's problems can't seem to keep a web link stable for more than 24 hours. Here is a working link: ] https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memorandum%20re%20Schedule%20Policy%20Career%20Guidance%2001-27-25%20FINAL.pdf |
Anonymous
| And of course there’s a catch all category of “whatever the OPM director says” |
Anonymous
| Umm a president can't just nullify a reg without notice and comment. These folks clearly DGAF and will just move as fast as they can and deal with litigation as needed |
Anonymous
| "Being held accountable for the success of one or more specific programs or projects" - wow. That's incredibly broad. Great! |
Anonymous
| I’m not a lawyer, but doesn’t the decision to end Chevron deference mean that this crazy interpretation of the civil service laws gets less weight than it previously would have? |
Anonymous
+1 “Move fast and break things.” |
Anonymous
| Can’t this go to court? And I mean quickly? Why isn’t anyone seeking an injunction? |
Anonymous
The treasury union sued last week. |
Anonymous
It should, but I’m sure SCOTUS will invent a special rule that makes sure that only applies to decisions from Democratic administrations. |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
I’m not covered by the union. We need a judge to issue an injunction. |
Anonymous
| Can someone explain why this is a bad thing? |
Anonymous
Not interesting in engaging with trolls on this. Go to google, look it up, and start a new thread if you’d like to discuss it. |
Anonymous
That is what this thread is! This is a different poster, just truly trying to understand what this means. |
Anonymous
We can be fired at any time without cause. Get it now? Thanks and go back to your little cave |