Northwood is a good school. The commute to the holding school is a problem. Northwood has some comfortable families. Some want schools in walking distance for religious reasons. |
So then by your own words is not an apples to apples comparison because those are major parts of what make a program successful or not. Also, comparing a program that's been running for a short time to one that been running for decades is not apples to apples. Where is the comparison to when RMIB first began. |
I mean, personally, I agree with you. Experience, time and supports matter. That’s precisely why I believe MCPS is making false promises when they claim their 6-region program model will deliver equitable, rigorous program access to MCPS students. I merely brought up the Regional IB program as an example where MCPS promised the same thing and didn’t deliver as proof to why I was skeptical of their claim. So again: your beef with the apples to apples comparison is with MCPS, not me. They are the ones who are discounting the time, experience and supports that it takes to create successful programs, which is precisely the feedback community members have been giving them from the beginning. |
This is exactly the Blair magnet. |
|
Montgomery Perspective has the coalition's full statement:
https://montgomeryperspective.com/2025/11/12/black-and-brown-coalition-supports-mcps-region-model/ Still no clarity about why they think this is what the plan is, which it clearly is not: MCPS should forge ahead with implementing its plan, making sure to prioritize traditionally disadvantaged areas before adding programs elsewhere. |
Also no signatures |
MCCPTA is a member of the Black and Brown Coalition. |
Wontgomery Blair does have a nice ring to it. Thank you for including us in the rarified strata of the Ws |
So we can assume this statement probably reflects Byron Johns and Diego Uriburu's perspectives and is not representative of the members of the Black and Brown Coalition. |
+1 I completely agree with the Black and Brown Coalition that they should phase the implementation of programs and NOT place new programs in wealthy schools until they have successfully established programs in underserved areas. But from what I have heard from MCPS, they are vehemently against anything other than immediate dissolution of the consortia and immediate creation of all the proposed programs that next year's 8th graders will be applying to. So unfortunately, they will be implementing programs in wealthy schools along with all the other schools, and those programs in the wealthy schools will be the most likely to succeed for obvious reasons. We'll end up with a system where kids in low income schools with access to cars will travel to wealthy schools for programs and low income kids will mostly not be able to access specialized programs. |
|
BBC should have said slow this down and we want a seat at the table.
BBC must have gotten the slick cherrypicked version of the MCPS glossy brochure, esp since this is a change from their previous statement. I guess they didn't realize that transportation was going to be a problem. |
|
This part of the statement just doesn't make any sense based on what the actual MCPS proposal is:
"In fact, children in the under-resourced communities have the most at stake with these changes as many don’t have access to high-quality opportunities. That’s why we want to see priority placed on those areas as MCPS’ new regional model is put into effect. There are many eligible, deserving, underserved students and their families that have waited too long to have access to opportunities comparable to what other parts of the county enjoy. To avoid “analysis paralysis,” MCPS should forge ahead with implementing its plan, making sure to prioritize traditionally disadvantaged areas before adding programs elsewhere." |
This is an AI-generated list, see the top of the post. It's nonsense. |
BBC posted a statement on request from the superintendent, who is trying to fend off the criticism of his programs plan from the teachers' union and MCCPTA. |
People are using AI because the Black and Brown Coalition does not list its members on its website or in the statement. They say they represent "over 30" orgs but there isn't clear public info on which orgs these are or which ones, if any, signed onto this statement. From the info we have, it would appear the statement primarily reflects the perspective of two men, whom I understand to be doing good work but who have financial ties to MCPS and the BOE and are therefore not independent representatives of BIPOC communities in MoCo. |