Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t take a victory lap just yet if I were BL supporters. She still has to prove her own case, and let’s face it, she can’t. When she either withdraws her claims or loses in court, Justin will look like a victim of her abuse who was neutered by all of the privileges lively and others took advantage of. And it will be true because that’s exactly what happened here.

The judge didn’t say Baldoni’s case was frivolous. The judge even acknowledged that there was powerful inference that the NYT had the story months before the CRD complaint. He simply said litigation privilege prevents Justin from suing Blake and fair report privilege prevents Justin from suing NYT. This is a case where the law protected the abusers. If you want it changed, you’ll have to take it up with state legislatures or the Supreme Court. I said this earlier and no lively supporters have commented because they know it’s true. Baldoni was the victim of bad laws that stacked the deck against him.

So repeatedly wrong on just about everything so far and yet the lectures keep coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t take a victory lap just yet if I were BL supporters. She still has to prove her own case, and let’s face it, she can’t. When she either withdraws her claims or loses in court, Justin will look like a victim of her abuse who was neutered by all of the privileges lively and others took advantage of. And it will be true because that’s exactly what happened here.

The judge didn’t say Baldoni’s case was frivolous. The judge even acknowledged that there was powerful inference that the NYT had the story months before the CRD complaint. He simply said litigation privilege prevents Justin from suing Blake and fair report privilege prevents Justin from suing NYT. This is a case where the law protected the abusers. If you want it changed, you’ll have to take it up with state legislatures or the Supreme Court. I said this earlier and no lively supporters have commented because they know it’s true. Baldoni was the victim of bad laws that stacked the deck against him.

So repeatedly wrong on just about everything so far and yet the lectures keep coming.

Not everything, we were right about Taylor dropping Blake. We were correct that Freedman would work out an agreement with Venable. And we didn’t even see the abandonment of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim coming. That came out of left field.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t take a victory lap just yet if I were BL supporters. She still has to prove her own case, and let’s face it, she can’t. When she either withdraws her claims or loses in court, Justin will look like a victim of her abuse who was neutered by all of the privileges lively and others took advantage of. And it will be true because that’s exactly what happened here.

The judge didn’t say Baldoni’s case was frivolous. The judge even acknowledged that there was powerful inference that the NYT had the story months before the CRD complaint. He simply said litigation privilege prevents Justin from suing Blake and fair report privilege prevents Justin from suing NYT. This is a case where the law protected the abusers. If you want it changed, you’ll have to take it up with state legislatures or the Supreme Court. I said this earlier and no lively supporters have commented because they know it’s true. Baldoni was the victim of bad laws that stacked the deck against him.

So repeatedly wrong on just about everything so far and yet the lectures keep coming.

Not everything, we were right about Taylor dropping Blake. We were correct that Freedman would work out an agreement with Venable. And we didn’t even see the abandonment of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim coming. That came out of left field.

Also right about the subpoena to the cell phone providers getting quashed. Just not right on the counter claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has Freedman said anything about this?

He is not quoted in major outlets like CNN, Daily Mail, NY Times, and People. All say they reached out to Baldoni's team and got no comment.

[Anonymous]

I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t take a victory lap just yet if I were BL supporters. She still has to prove her own case, and let’s face it, she can’t. When she either withdraws her claims or loses in court, Justin will look like a victim of her abuse who was neutered by all of the privileges lively and others took advantage of. And it will be true because that’s exactly what happened here.

The judge didn’t say Baldoni’s case was frivolous. The judge even acknowledged that there was powerful inference that the NYT had the story months before the CRD complaint. He simply said litigation privilege prevents Justin from suing Blake and fair report privilege prevents Justin from suing NYT. This is a case where the law protected the abusers. If you want it changed, you’ll have to take it up with state legislatures or the Supreme Court. I said this earlier and no lively supporters have commented because they know it’s true. Baldoni was the victim of bad laws that stacked the deck against him.

So repeatedly wrong on just about everything so far and yet the lectures keep coming.

Not everything, we were right about Taylor dropping Blake. We were correct that Freedman would work out an agreement with Venable. And we didn’t even see the abandonment of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim coming. That came out of left field.

Also right about the subpoena to the cell phone providers getting quashed. Just not right on the counter claims.

lol, they won't fess up to being wrong about a single thing (nevermind this extremely major thing!!), but look at them lining up to claim their tiny little Vs on the provider subpoenaes and Venable (the rest weren't legal/not yours) above like sports trophies. Talk about petty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t take a victory lap just yet if I were BL supporters. She still has to prove her own case, and let’s face it, she can’t. When she either withdraws her claims or loses in court, Justin will look like a victim of her abuse who was neutered by all of the privileges lively and others took advantage of. And it will be true because that’s exactly what happened here.

The judge didn’t say Baldoni’s case was frivolous. The judge even acknowledged that there was powerful inference that the NYT had the story months before the CRD complaint. He simply said litigation privilege prevents Justin from suing Blake and fair report privilege prevents Justin from suing NYT. This is a case where the law protected the abusers. If you want it changed, you’ll have to take it up with state legislatures or the Supreme Court. I said this earlier and no lively supporters have commented because they know it’s true. Baldoni was the victim of bad laws that stacked the deck against him.

So repeatedly wrong on just about everything so far and yet the lectures keep coming.

Not everything, we were right about Taylor dropping Blake. We were correct that Freedman would work out an agreement with Venable. And we didn’t even see the abandonment of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim coming. That came out of left field.

Also right about the subpoena to the cell phone providers getting quashed. Just not right on the counter claims.

lol, they won't fess up to being wrong about a single thing (nevermind this extremely major thing!!), but look at them lining up to claim their tiny little Vs on the provider subpoenaes and Venable (the rest weren't legal/not yours) above like sports trophies. Talk about petty.

Dp. What are you talking about? Some blake people, probably including you, have been crowing non stop about Blake’s win today, demanding apologies for Jb people being ‘all wrong!!’ etc. So this PP merely pointed out the facts. Pro B people were right about some things, while obviously wrong about others.

And??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

That this is originally a SH claim at the heart of it all is lost in all of the noise, including this thread. I am not going to assume she is lying or exaggerating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

That this is originally a SH claim at the heart of it all is lost in all of the noise, including this thread. I am not going to assume she is lying or exaggerating.

There is direct evidence that BL both lied and exaggerated.

[Anonymous]

Blake's lawyers filed a reply motion to Wayfarer's opposition to the sanctions, noting that all the claims were dismissed earlier today. I only skimmed but the language is fairly aggressive. I don't know what Liman will do... yesterday I would have said this would annoy him but today? Maybe he grants it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

That this is originally a SH claim at the heart of it all is lost in all of the noise, including this thread. I am not going to assume she is lying or exaggerating.

There is direct evidence that BL both lied and exaggerated.

Right and that’s why when pro Blake people gloat about this win today, I can’t help almost feeling bad for her for being such a sucker and taking this case forward (maybe she assumed wayfarer et al would buckle asap). She’s spent millions of dollars and only trashed her reputation further, and lost a relationship with TS. I saw some poll today saying approx 96% of people polled think she wasn’t SH. So her ‘win’ is not having to pay damages for defamation. Not sure that’s such a win. She is still viewed by most as a liar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

That this is originally a SH claim at the heart of it all is lost in all of the noise, including this thread. I am not going to assume she is lying or exaggerating.

There is direct evidence that BL both lied and exaggerated.

Right and that’s why when pro Blake people gloat about this win today, I can’t help almost feeling bad for her for being such a sucker and taking this case forward (maybe she assumed wayfarer et al would buckle asap). She’s spent millions of dollars and only trashed her reputation further, and lost a relationship with TS. I saw some poll today saying approx 96% of people polled think she wasn’t SH. So her ‘win’ is not having to pay damages for defamation. Not sure that’s such a win. She is still viewed by most as a liar

Link please. This sort of talk just lends itself even more to bots/online smear tactics.

[Anonymous]

So what happens to Justin PR agents since they were also plaintiffs? They just started their company. There's no coming back from this for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just do not understand the Blake Lively 'hate'. She doesn't seem any worse or more annoying than some other celebs. I really do think that there has been some sort of online propaganda campaign that has people really riled up. I guess I can see how she can come off as a little annoying or aloof but definitely not worthy of the vitriol and definitely not the only woman celeb like this.

And I say this as an anti-Meghan Markler so it's not like I can't have irrationally strong feelings of dislike towards celebs I don't even know.

I’m a woman and I’ll note that when women lie or exaggerate about SH or SA, the world is especially reactive. Blake should have considered that before she started this

That this is originally a SH claim at the heart of it all is lost in all of the noise, including this thread. I am not going to assume she is lying or exaggerating.

There is direct evidence that BL both lied and exaggerated.

Right and that’s why when pro Blake people gloat about this win today, I can’t help almost feeling bad for her for being such a sucker and taking this case forward (maybe she assumed wayfarer et al would buckle asap). She’s spent millions of dollars and only trashed her reputation further, and lost a relationship with TS. I saw some poll today saying approx 96% of people polled think she wasn’t SH. So her ‘win’ is not having to pay damages for defamation. Not sure that’s such a win. She is still viewed by most as a liar

Link please. This sort of talk just lends itself even more to bots/online smear tactics.

Again, there is direct evidence that BL both lied and exaggerated.