Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The board and the superintendent have all said those four maps are being scrapped and they will have new maps at a later point. Of course they will fix the Floris/Discovery Square situation in those. I don't know why y'all are hung up on four maps that aren't even viable anymore.

Where did she say that? I know she said there would be a fifth map for the comprehensive boundary study.

I don’t remember her saying they would be scrapped but she could have. I do know at the community meeting she said they were working on additional maps specifically for the Western High School.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

DP. She clearly thinks her child is more important than yours.

[Anonymous]

At the meeting at Western a couple weeks ago Reid said the four scenarios were just unvetted options to generate ideas. They’ll produce new map(s) again in the Spring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At the meeting at Western a couple weeks ago Reid said the four scenarios were just unvetted options to generate ideas. They’ll produce new map(s) again in the Spring.

Cannot believe they are waiting until Spring. too late.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

What is unnecessary? What if the school is overcrowded? What if the bus ride is too long?

This is about Western schools. All are crowded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

To the "full stop" lady, redistricting happens all the time. Franklin farm will and should be redistricted. The former at&t site will be redeveloped into a mix of residential and retail units. Those kids that will be living there will be zoned for Oakton because it's right down the road. Oakton needs space for these kids. Your kids are 9+ miles away. Get over it. You can't just keep making websites and online petitions to bully and get your way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

To the "full stop" lady, redistricting happens all the time. Franklin farm will and should be redistricted. The former at&t site will be redeveloped into a mix of residential and retail units. Those kids that will be living there will be zoned for Oakton because it's right down the road. Oakton needs space for these kids. Your kids are 9+ miles away. Get over it. You can't just keep making websites and online petitions to bully and get your way.

Langley parents have kept kids even further away at Langley for years, so why shouldn’t Oakton take a page from their playbook? They can’t credibly say 9 miles away from Oakton is too far if 10-12 miles from Langley is fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

To the "full stop" lady, redistricting happens all the time. Franklin farm will and should be redistricted. The former at&t site will be redeveloped into a mix of residential and retail units. Those kids that will be living there will be zoned for Oakton because it's right down the road. Oakton needs space for these kids. Your kids are 9+ miles away. Get over it. You can't just keep making websites and online petitions to bully and get your way.

Langley parents have kept kids even further away at Langley for years, so why shouldn’t Oakton take a page from their playbook? They can’t credibly say 9 miles away from Oakton is too far if 10-12 miles from Langley is fine.

2 wrongs don’t make a right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

To the "full stop" lady, redistricting happens all the time. Franklin farm will and should be redistricted. The former at&t site will be redeveloped into a mix of residential and retail units. Those kids that will be living there will be zoned for Oakton because it's right down the road. Oakton needs space for these kids. Your kids are 9+ miles away. Get over it. You can't just keep making websites and online petitions to bully and get your way.

Langley parents have kept kids even further away at Langley for years, so why shouldn’t Oakton take a page from their playbook? They can’t credibly say 9 miles away from Oakton is too far if 10-12 miles from Langley is fine.

Oakton is at capacity with more soon to come.
Big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict FCPS would choose Option B or something close to it, where the vast majority of Crossfield kids won't get moved.

Read Sample Letter #1.

At a minimum, we request that the same number of boundary scenario maps be released for the Western High School as have been provided for other boundary studies. Without this, it is impossible for families to provide informed feedback.

The pro-Oakton families asked for multiple scenarios, and FCPS gave them four options.

Also from Letter 1:

Finally, I respectfully request that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process until comprehensive, transparent, and equitable information is shared.

The pro-Oakton families requested that FCPS pause and slow down the Western High School boundary revision process, and FCPS responded by delaying the decision until June.

Now the pro-Oakton families are pivoting to Option B since the magnet school is off the table. Read Sample Letter #4.

I urge the School Board to select Boundary Option B and to demonstrate its commitment to stability, continuity, and student-centered decision-making.

I think they are going to get what they want.

The only question is Mr. McDaniel, as he was the only one openly asking for relief to Oakton and a solution for the long ride from Crossfield to Oakton.

But for other board members, it would be an easy choice. The Western HS won't be like Justice HS, where nobody wanted to be reassigned to. Other elementary school parents, including Floris, McNair, Coates, Oak Hill, and Fox Mill parents, would actively want or not mind moving to the Western HS.

You're under-estimating the number of Chantilly families who'd prefer to stay at Chantilly rather than move to a new school.

Overestimating the degree to which other groups want to attend the new school is a core part of the rooted in Oakton strategy. Note they are also happy to say that the Oak Hill ES community would just be fine with getting moved to Carson and out of Franklin, so they can slide in there.

The School Board set the parameters for the boundary study. They should use those to set the boundaries for the new school. This is not that hard.

I would say that most people want to stay where they are. That is not how you do this.

Well here are what FCPS states as their priorities for the boundary review:

1. Ensure equitable access to programs and facilities.
2. Balance available capacity to make the best use of our school facilities.
3. Establish consistent “attendance zones” by removing isolated attendance areas and reducing split feeder patterns. This would increase the likelihood that students from the same neighborhood would be assigned to the same schools which are also the closest option.
4. Minimize travel time for students.

I agree they ought to be using objective criteria and not let emotional arguments sway the decision making. The problem is they opened that can of worms with the way they’ve been conducting meetings. They are afraid of making people upset. So here we are in a situation where everyone thinks if they just complain enough they can influence the school board to do what they want. Some people didn’t learn the important lessons when they were kids that the world doesn’t revolve around them and that life isn’t always fair. Some people will be more affected by boundary changes as a result of where they live. It’s not personal.

Yeah, the school board should just F all of their constituents raw dog. They should rip kids away from their friends, teachers and schools for no compelling reason whatsoever. The school board should just teach everyone in the county a lesson that they don’t give a flying F about consistency in schools or the overall quality of FCPS.

Do you ever stop to think before you post?

Your hysterics aren’t based in reality. They already have a grandfathering policy and have a plan to phase kids into the new school. No one will be ripped away from their current school. Just admit you are pissed that you might have to send a younger kid to a school you deem less worthy some day, or that you might not get to live out your sports dreams through your children. Your kid attending a different high school than your older neighbor’s kids is not a hardship.

Ladies and gentlemen, this I’d how the school board and FCPS feels about your child.

Community concerns are disregarded when they seek to enact their agenda.

Um I’m just a parent like you. Is your family concerned about your paranoid delusions?

Yes, my delusions and those of thousands of families across the county who see this unnecessary boundary study for what it is.

But keep on pretending that you’ve got a silent majority who are just begging to upset their kids’ lives just because.

DP. This thread is about the new Western high school which was purchased to solve overcrowding in schools. And, apparently the Superintendent is somehow disconnecting it from the comprehensive boundary study. Puzzling, but that appears to be a fact.

You do understand that there are schools that are overcrowded and that there are students who are on school buses for much too long? You think that is okay?

No kids should be moved against their will unnecessarily, unless the family wants them moved. Full stop.

Good luck with that argument.

To the "full stop" lady, redistricting happens all the time. Franklin farm will and should be redistricted. The former at&t site will be redeveloped into a mix of residential and retail units. Those kids that will be living there will be zoned for Oakton because it's right down the road. Oakton needs space for these kids. Your kids are 9+ miles away. Get over it. You can't just keep making websites and online petitions to bully and get your way.

Langley parents have kept kids even further away at Langley for years, so why shouldn’t Oakton take a page from their playbook? They can’t credibly say 9 miles away from Oakton is too far if 10-12 miles from Langley is fine.

Oakton is at capacity with more soon to come.
Big difference.

Oakton gained 100 students since last year. It is now over capacity.