WaPO on HRT and women’s heart initiative follow-up

[Anonymous]

Gift link:
https://wapo.st/3Um1pSL

[Anonymous]

That’s great news for many women! Unfortunately having had estrogen positive breast cancer, I still can’t benefit (read the whole thing to see if that had changed), but the results are good news for many.

[Anonymous]

I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

You are what’s wrong with America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

Did you read the article? The Post is just reporting on an analysis published in the JAMA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

In case you read other things, here is the JAMA review so you can judge for yourself rather than taking WAPO at its word:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2818206?guestAccessKey=1393cab2-41d6-473b-9252-0c23e2cb4f74&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=050124

The first listed author was one of the lead investigators for the WHI. She is still rather begrudging in walking back their overreaction to their original findings but at least she is willing to try to be more measured in reporting the long-term results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gift link:
https://wapo.st/3Um1pSL

Thank you for access.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe anything written in the Washington Post. Their journalism is no longer credible. They have an agenda, unfortunately, which renders them a non credible source of information.

What agenda would that be? What objective are they supposedly trying to achieve?