Even $500k doesn’t go far with a dozen kids ,IVF and surrogate. The article says they have only $2M in a 401k in their mid-60s. |
| couldn't this have been avoided if there was a law with an age limit for becoming a parent via IVF and/or surrogate? At least one parent needs to be below a specified age? |
He has a $200k/yr pension. They’ll be fine. |
| This whole crazy situation has Lifetime Movie written all over it. |
It would also have been avoided if she hadn't forged the surrogacy documents. I know that some people are saying that fraud isn't a reason to lose your kids, but fraud to create another human being (or two) and have someone else gestate those babies isn't just everyday fraud. |
The bolded is truly bonkers. She is justifying forgery to have children on the basis that her DH bought a truck once?! |
The article talks about how her adult older kids (some of whom had kids of their own) were forced to do school pickups and manage the care of the newer kids while crazy 65 year old money continued to work as an RN. The older kids were on record as being unhappy about the situation--one of the older daughters said her mom promised to help her with her new baby and instead got this surrogate and got into this big mess with the new set of twins. |
$200K is not very much money. Wait until they need long term care. |
The article talks in some detail that this last set of twins was the final straw, that he had no idea about it, that he never consented. But then she said she would take half of all his assets, and he seemed to have realized that if he testified to her forging his signature on all those forms, she would go to jail and he would be stuck with all the young kids to care for them on his own... |
That seems to be the crux of it. Marybeth's husband and adult kids all know she's nuts, broke laws, and is not fit to take care of more kids. But they know that if she goes to jail, they'll have to take care of all the kids/siblings they never wanted in the first place. |
+1 seriously she doesn't appear to have much of a conscience about right and wrong |
If you are guaranteed that for the rest of your life, maybe inflation adjusted, it's actually quite a lot of money. |
| The surrogacy lawyer also sounds insane. Who takes on a 60+ client as an intended parent? Greedy and unethical. |
|
Aside from the moral and legal questions, I feel really sorry for all of those kids, including the ones who are now adults. In any huge family, it's virtually impossible for the parents to take care of all the kids, unless they have the financial resources to hire lots of help. Therefore, without their consent, older kids get drafted into becoming de facto parents at an early age. Some might do it willingly or enjoy kids, but it's really unfair to assume that your older kids should take on huge responsibility for the younger ones just because you want to keep having more children. I have nothing against large families, but I do object to people doing it if they can't actually be the parent for ALL the kids.
For those questioning whether this woman has a mental illness, I would point to the extraordinary deception and illegality she chose to engage in to get what she wanted. She acted like an addict. |
|
Man, I cannot believe she is not in jail! LOL
If anyone deserves to be, she does. The impact on so many lives.... I don't know. If I was an older kid, I'd just try to separate. Hell, you'd have enough siblings to still have family Seriously though, if that was my mom, I'd run away as fast as possible. If you consider that children kept leaving her at a certain age, she'd no longer want more and stop and the ones she has she could actually, would actually require spending time on raising.
|