DOGE?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives should support a return to the spoils system. The fed workforce is so far to the left that Trump can cut to the bone without hurting his supporters.

The fed workers were supposed to be neutral, but they couldn't help themselves. I hope they fire 90% of them.

Well the federal workforce is by and large more educated than the general public and we know there is a correlation between lack of education and voting R. So this tracks.

Stop taking this personally. This government is too GD big. Too many moving parts. Too much inefficiency.

Some cutbacks are necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives should support a return to the spoils system. The fed workforce is so far to the left that Trump can cut to the bone without hurting his supporters.

The fed workers were supposed to be neutral, but they couldn't help themselves. I hope they fire 90% of them.

Well the federal workforce is by and large more educated than the general public and we know there is a correlation between lack of education and voting R. So this tracks.

Stop taking this personally. This government is too GD big. Too many moving parts. Too much inefficiency.

Some cutbacks are necessary.

Everyone agrees cutbacks are needed. But total agency tear downs or mass firings are not. There are ways around it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the launch could be funny but some serious cleaning needs to happen from Govt.

My father received a letter from Social Security. The first page was printed on both sides and conveyed more than was needed. A second page contained only a signature line and the website. He worked in the private sector and send feedback on line to SSN suggesting that the signature line could be at the bottom of the other page, thus savings reams of paper. He also suggested that people be asked on line if they wanted a printed and mailed letter or could just read the message on line. He received a response from SSN saying that its computers could not be set for another line of type so the extra page was necessary. It also said that letters had to be mailed. My 80 year old ex-Big Accounting father made a good point that was easily implemented and completely ignored. It's not like saving the cost of an Apache helicopter but he was blown off.

I work for SSA and I literally move the signature line on a daily basis. So, no idea what they were talking about. As for mailing, we do need to mail a lot of stuff because it often involves legal notice and court rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

And it’s worth 30b less than what he bought it for

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

It lost 78% of its value. Even Fidelity says it lost big time with its investment. And, probably even more with the mass exodus by 11/15. I guess MAGA thinks this is a winning strategy. But, isolationists always lose world standing, so I’m sure America’s about to lose 78% too.

[Anonymous]

There are over 400 agencies

And this one can go right away

Climate Resilience Task Force: Initiated in 2022, this interagency task force collaborates across federal entities to develop strategies for mitigating and adapting to climate change impacts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

I’m pp just back to add that this kind of thinking prevails when MAGA don’t understand economics or believe economists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

It lost 78% of its value. Even Fidelity says it lost big time with its investment. And, probably even more with the mass exodus by 11/15. I guess MAGA thinks this is a winning strategy. But, isolationists always lose world standing, so I’m sure America’s about to lose 78% too.

Did it ever have that value? Or was that an illusion, like much of Wall Street?

There's a lot of false valuations. Big changes coming. The stock market has become a gambling house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are over 400 agencies

And this one can go right away

Climate Resilience Task Force: Initiated in 2022, this interagency task force collaborates across federal entities to develop strategies for mitigating and adapting to climate change impacts.

So, you’re not a news reader? You don’t know that the North East is on fire and that for the first time ever our entire country is in a drought. If you don’t believe in the Federal government be ready to not rebuild after a climate disaster. I’m sure we’ll start seeing climate refugees in the US because without any support structure and denialism if the problem, what is the alternative?

You do know how many of the world’s population lives in slums and shantytowns, right?!? If you don’t think it could happen here, then we truly are going to live in a hell of our own making.

[Anonymous]

Here is what we can do right away

Immigration Enforcement: DHS (ICE) and DOJ (EOIR) handle different aspects of immigration. Combining these could streamline processes and improve coordination.

Environmental Protection: EPA (pollution control) and DOI (land conservation) have overlapping roles. Merging water quality and land conservation functions could enhance environmental strategies.

Nuclear Oversight: DOE (nuclear R&D) and NRC (safety regulation) both oversee nuclear activities. Unifying oversight may improve consistency and efficiency.

Transportation Safety: DOT sets policies, while NTSB investigates accidents. Increased collaboration could strengthen the implementation of safety recommendations.

Food Safety: FDA, USDA, and CDC each have roles in food safety. A unified agency could reduce duplication and enhance public health protections.

Streamlining these overlapping responsibilities could improve efficiency and service delivery across federal operations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

I’m pp just back to add that this kind of thinking prevails when MAGA don’t understand economics or believe economists.

I have worked in four government agencies int he past. I have seen so many people come in and browse the internet all day and take long lunches in the cafeteria.

Let's get real. You know it. I know it. Some people literally have four hours of work a week that they stretch out. No word of a lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am all for measured and thoughtful changes to government to make it efficient.

I don’t know that creating a redundant organization outside the government is the efficient way to do that, nor do I think a billionaire deciding randomly that 99 agencies is what is best is measured or thoughtful.

It will not be random. He cut 75% of twitter and it is functioning very well.

Standby.

It lost 78% of its value. Even Fidelity says it lost big time with its investment. And, probably even more with the mass exodus by 11/15. I guess MAGA thinks this is a winning strategy. But, isolationists always lose world standing, so I’m sure America’s about to lose 78% too.

Did it ever have that value? Or was that an illusion, like much of Wall Street?

There's a lot of false valuations. Big changes coming. The stock market has become a gambling house.

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Financial Regulation: Multiple agencies, including the SEC, CFTC, and Federal Reserve, regulate financial markets with overlapping jurisdictions in areas like trading and consumer protection. A more unified regulatory body could streamline oversight and reduce complexity for institutions.

Education Programs: The Department of Education and various agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) provide funding and support for educational programs. Merging similar grants and scholarship programs could simplify access for students and educators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we start a federal job tally under trump? So far, +2

They are working for free.