+1 |
Your link requires a paid subscription. Why should Americans have to pay a news website to try and suss out a presidential candidate’s policy and plans? |
Those are goodies for voters. These are easy. What about the hard issues? |
WH officials tweeting a bee during key moments of the Harris campaign. |
I just want to go to Kamala’s website and see her policies. I don’t want to listen to her laugh or stumble through an hour long speech from a teleprompter, I just want a simple black and white this is what you’re getting. Why is that so difficult for her? |
Bribes- vote for KH, she is going to make it financially advantageous for you. |
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was. |
+1 |
None. There are a few that allow it in exceptional (and extremely sad) circumstances. |
So is Trump. |
You asked for a link. There are other articles and sources. I can read it without a subscription. In part it reads: The most striking proposals were for the elimination of medical debt for millions of Americans; the “first-ever” ban on price gouging for groceries and food; a cap on prescription drug costs; a $25,000 subsidy for first-time home buyers; and a child tax credit that would provide $6,000 per child to families for the first year of a baby’s life. |
Amazing people want to stimulate demand for homes when demand isn’t even close to the problem. The problem is supply. And they think a good solution is granting people more money to push prices higher. I live in an insane asylum. |
Trump is running on tax cuts (i.e., bribes) for billionaires and electric cars for Mush. He already delivered on the tax cuts last time. That's the whole GOP platform and the only thing they can implement with any sort of consistency. Are you suggesting that being the candidate that is financially advantageous for you isn't a winning strategy? Because if you are, then I have a bridge to sell you. |
Are those not policy positions? |
Hmmm, turning around a crashed economy and exceeding replaced jobs to record numbers passing the infrastructure bill that trump could never do passing the chips act, which has already started to reap benefits with manufacturing jobs passing the IRA which has had positive impact on green economy investments pumping oil at record numbers, combined with the above, makes the US a net energy exporter strengthening our NATO allies and stem the Russia threat. Ya, these are all sucky. |