Media allowing another but her emails

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

And you have all the reasoning of a petulant adolescent.

No, it’s quite simple and logical. Neither man is competent for the position they are running for, so I will not support either of them. You also have to get a better talking point, because voters like me are the ones that actually will decide this election.

It’s not a talking point. One of these men is going to be president and writing in a third candidate isn’t “ranging against the machine” or “sticking it to the man.” It’s a waste of your time and vote. No one cares. You aren’t influencing anyone. It’s a temper tantrum. And oh, btw, there are numerous articles on troll farms encouraging apathy in American voters BECAUSE it’s damaging.

I am neither raging against the machine nor sticking it to the man. I am seeing 2 men who both are incompetent to lead this country for the next 4 years and I am not going to support either one just because you feel one is so much better than the other. The GOP was always going down with the Trump ship, but the Dems could have done better and locked down independent and undecided voters but chose not to, and in some ways that is more disappointing to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This kind of spin falls flat after the debate, OP. No one’s falling for it any longer.

OP himself is

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

And you have all the reasoning of a petulant adolescent.

No, it’s quite simple and logical. Neither man is competent for the position they are running for, so I will not support either of them. You also have to get a better talking point, because voters like me are the ones that actually will decide this election.

It’s not a talking point. One of these men is going to be president and writing in a third candidate isn’t “ranging against the machine” or “sticking it to the man.” It’s a waste of your time and vote. No one cares. You aren’t influencing anyone. It’s a temper tantrum. And oh, btw, there are numerous articles on troll farms encouraging apathy in American voters BECAUSE it’s damaging.

I am neither raging against the machine nor sticking it to the man. I am seeing 2 men who both are incompetent to lead this country for the next 4 years and I am not going to support either one just because you feel one is so much better than the other. The GOP was always going down with the Trump ship, but the Dems could have done better and locked down independent and undecided voters but chose not to, and in some ways that is more disappointing to me.

Relax. Biden will be departing the 2024 race soon and then it will be a normal/competent candidate vs the incompetent Trump. The decision for the swing voters that will decide this election will then be a very easy decision. Slam dunk landslide victory. Sound good?

[Anonymous]

The nationwide media is addicted to reporting on Trump and getting attention that way.

I've stopped clicking on or watching anything that mentions Trump. Makes life a lot easier and if every non MAGA did this, maybe the media would stop reporting on him so much. It's basically clickbait at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

And you have all the reasoning of a petulant adolescent.

No, it’s quite simple and logical. Neither man is competent for the position they are running for, so I will not support either of them. You also have to get a better talking point, because voters like me are the ones that actually will decide this election.

It’s not a talking point. One of these men is going to be president and writing in a third candidate isn’t “ranging against the machine” or “sticking it to the man.” It’s a waste of your time and vote. No one cares. You aren’t influencing anyone. It’s a temper tantrum. And oh, btw, there are numerous articles on troll farms encouraging apathy in American voters BECAUSE it’s damaging.

I am neither raging against the machine nor sticking it to the man. I am seeing 2 men who both are incompetent to lead this country for the next 4 years and I am not going to support either one just because you feel one is so much better than the other. The GOP was always going down with the Trump ship, but the Dems could have done better and locked down independent and undecided voters but chose not to, and in some ways that is more disappointing to me.

Yes, you are. You think this is some protest vote and there’s no such thing. It’s a childish temper tantrum that only well off white men can afford to throw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Now the media is running with Biden is impaired, a talking point crafted by MAGA--we saw what happened last time.

“Allowing”? They’re actively doing this. “Allowing” sounds passive. This is active.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

Relax, the Dems will put up a competent candidate after Biden's announcement which is coming sooner than later. That competent candidate will crush Trump because let's not forget who and what Trump is. We don't need a superman candidate. Just an average one.

No, but it needs to be the right one. Newsom will not win for instance.

Have you paid attention to Newsom lately? In the past year or two, he has really tacked right, from left to center. Possibly with presidential aspirations but I think more out of pragmatism for what needs to be done in his state.

Nothing about his recently passed budget was right to center. He has destroyed the economics in his own state.

That’s BS. Cite?

California has the strongest economy of any state thanks to his leadership.

Is this a joke? He went from a $100b surplus to a $45b deficit!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The NYT has always been a right wing newspaper.

lol lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

And you have all the reasoning of a petulant adolescent.

No, it’s quite simple and logical. Neither man is competent for the position they are running for, so I will not support either of them. You also have to get a better talking point, because voters like me are the ones that actually will decide this election.

It’s not a talking point. One of these men is going to be president and writing in a third candidate isn’t “ranging against the machine” or “sticking it to the man.” It’s a waste of your time and vote. No one cares. You aren’t influencing anyone. It’s a temper tantrum. And oh, btw, there are numerous articles on troll farms encouraging apathy in American voters BECAUSE it’s damaging.

I am neither raging against the machine nor sticking it to the man. I am seeing 2 men who both are incompetent to lead this country for the next 4 years and I am not going to support either one just because you feel one is so much better than the other. The GOP was always going down with the Trump ship, but the Dems could have done better and locked down independent and undecided voters but chose not to, and in some ways that is more disappointing to me.

So you are going to throw a tantrum and help hand the election to Trump, who is known quantity and a known danger to our democracy and way of life.

Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NYT has always been a right wing newspaper.

lol lol

It is one now. The liberal mainstream media is no longer in existence, if it ever was. Another right-wing talking point that they use to discredit anyone who tries to run a story with facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NYT has always been a right wing newspaper.

lol lol

It is one now. The liberal mainstream media is no longer in existence, if it ever was. Another right-wing talking point that they use to discredit anyone who tries to run a story with facts.

You are cuckoo if you think NY Times is right wing. Like, out of this world nuts.

[Anonymous]

At least Biden “finally beat Medicare.” That was one hell of an achievement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

Relax, the Dems will put up a competent candidate after Biden's announcement which is coming sooner than later. That competent candidate will crush Trump because let's not forget who and what Trump is. We don't need a superman candidate. Just an average one.

No, but it needs to be the right one. Newsom will not win for instance.

Have you paid attention to Newsom lately? In the past year or two, he has really tacked right, from left to center. Possibly with presidential aspirations but I think more out of pragmatism for what needs to be done in his state.

Nothing about his recently passed budget was right to center. He has destroyed the economics in his own state.

That’s BS. Cite?

California has the strongest economy of any state thanks to his leadership.

Is this a joke? He went from a $100b surplus to a $45b deficit!

Still the highest GDP in the country. CA will be fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

And you have all the reasoning of a petulant adolescent.

No, it’s quite simple and logical. Neither man is competent for the position they are running for, so I will not support either of them. You also have to get a better talking point, because voters like me are the ones that actually will decide this election.

It’s not a talking point. One of these men is going to be president and writing in a third candidate isn’t “ranging against the machine” or “sticking it to the man.” It’s a waste of your time and vote. No one cares. You aren’t influencing anyone. It’s a temper tantrum. And oh, btw, there are numerous articles on troll farms encouraging apathy in American voters BECAUSE it’s damaging.

I am neither raging against the machine nor sticking it to the man. I am seeing 2 men who both are incompetent to lead this country for the next 4 years and I am not going to support either one just because you feel one is so much better than the other. The GOP was always going down with the Trump ship, but the Dems could have done better and locked down independent and undecided voters but chose not to, and in some ways that is more disappointing to me.

Relax. Biden will be departing the 2024 race soon and then it will be a normal/competent candidate vs the incompetent Trump. The decision for the swing voters that will decide this election will then be a very easy decision. Slam dunk landslide victory. Sound good?

Scrappy Joe/Scranton Joe is a comeback kid. He never quits. That's what makes him Scrappy Joe.

Please don't let Joe drop out. HAHAHAHAHA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op I have bad news for you.
I’m a democrat
My dad’s a democrat
My brother’s a democrat
My mom’s a democrat

We all got on the phone Friday morning. None of us had bothered listening to pundits and spin doctors. We all said the same thing.

“He’s not with it. He’s too old. He needs to step aside”
We saw what we saw, so miss me with your media talking points.

That is not the question. You need to choose trump or Biden. If you sit it out, you are not protecting your family. My family will be much better off under Biden so I need to try to give them that. If you want the con artist, then choose trump and protect your family from Biden.

This is a tired talking point and I don't get people like you. I'm not voting for Trump, but do I want a senile POTUS? No, and neither should you. Why is it ok with you? Demand better.

It’s not a talking point. It’s his voting works.

If you don't vote for Trump, but also don't vote for Biden, by default the numbers will be in Trump's favor and you will have a senile President Trump in charge.

It was the responsibility of the Dems to put up a competent candidate, but instead they put up someone whose mental acuity is clearly in decline and will only get worse as the years go on. If they wanted me to cast an affirmative vote for a Dem they needed to do way better than this. I won’t vote for Trump but I cannot vote for Biden either. If that is tantamount to voting for Trump then they need to take a look in the mirror and figure out why they thought running an old man with fading cognitive abilities was the answer.

Relax, the Dems will put up a competent candidate after Biden's announcement which is coming sooner than later. That competent candidate will crush Trump because let's not forget who and what Trump is. We don't need a superman candidate. Just an average one.

No, but it needs to be the right one. Newsom will not win for instance.

Have you paid attention to Newsom lately? In the past year or two, he has really tacked right, from left to center. Possibly with presidential aspirations but I think more out of pragmatism for what needs to be done in his state.

Nothing about his recently passed budget was right to center. He has destroyed the economics in his own state.

That’s BS. Cite?

California has the strongest economy of any state thanks to his leadership.

Is this a joke? He went from a $100b surplus to a $45b deficit!

Still the highest GDP in the country. CA will be fine.

Big swings in California budget projections tied to the stock market and tech stock options. That $45B deficit was due to the down market in 2022. The record breaking run of NVIDIA has brought an eye-water amount of tax income into California.