Cool story, bro. Now let’s cover some facts. 1. The percentage of those “purchased properties” (which, incidentally, were often purchased far below market value under threat of violence or even death) amounted to less than 1/80th of 1% of the partition in Israel’s favor. So sure, they bought land and then the U.N. gave them 8,000x that amount in additional land - for free! 2. The U.N. … ? You want everyone to respect the U.N.’s decision on the singular day the final terms of the partition were conceived, but then join you in condemning that same U.N. as corrupt co-conspirators of Hamas on every other day since? 3. Comparative death toll is what? 74 dead Palestinians for every 1 dead Israeli since 1948? 74:1 … ? You call that annihilation of the Israelis? The Jews? On what planet do you cultivate the psychopharmaceuticals necessary to perceive this conflict as an annihilation of anyone other than the Palestinians? This is like a fever dream. The things you expect others to believe … |
Gonna stop your lying right here. Extremists in Israel are not a minority. They are in the government, they are in the army, they are in the police, they are in the courts. Where did half a million settlers in the West Bank come from? Mars? Where did the judges in the military courts come from that only prosecute 3% of settler crimes against the Palestinians? Where did IDF soldiers come from who look on while the settlers pogrom the Palestinian villages? Where did the IDF sniper came from that assassinated Shireen Abu Akleh? Imported from moon? How is this so-called tiny minority of extremists, in your telling, achieving these grand feats of stealing so much land? do they have magic powers? or are there simply many more of them than you'd admit? But I grant you that a vast majority of Israelis want peace, which they define as "we get to do what we want and nothing happens to us at the end". Except the homes in which they want to be safe aren't 2-bedroom apartments in Tel Aviv that cost a million dollars. No, they want to be safe in their large cheap single family houses in illegal settlements on stolen land, with roads and electric grids and IDF protection and sparkling swimming pools filled by stolen water, surrounded by a tall fence to keep out all these nasty dirty Arabs, and connected to other outposts like this by fancy roads that Arabs aren't allowed to use. |
You are truly ridiculous. You misunderstood or misconstrued literally every point in the prior post. Let’s content ourselves with the mutual understanding that the Israel/Palestine situation bears no resemblance whatsoever to a Brazilian showing up in Maryland. This board challenges one’s faith in humanity’s capabilities. |
Are you incapable of rebutting what the PP said, or what? |
The enimity engendered by the British actions against the Scots have taken generations to calm to a point where people can coexist peacefully (more or less). Talking to older Scot people today, all the bad feelings have not completely disappeared. Same story in Ireland. It’s going to take time in I/P too. But it won’t work until the oppression has lifted. That has to come before the stopping of the violence can be hoped for. Hence the two state solution. Give Palestinians sovereignty and let them be the actual architects of their fate. Yes there will be Palestinians who for decades will moan about how the Israelis are at fault for everything. But if you take away the actual current power imbalance - unequal laws, military tribunals, rigged court systems, etc, - you take away slowly the reasons for terrorists to be labeled freedom fighters. |
Israel, we see you and will vote you out. |
Imagine if they had recognized the "State of Al Qaida" after 9/11.
This is shameful. |
Apartheid now, apartheid forever? |
Incapable? No. Unwilling? Yes. It's a waste of time. PP isn't arguing seriously or in good faith. It's a propaganda exercise. |
Genuine question--how is 100+ nations officially recognizing Palestine as a state different than the UN doing the same for Israel in 1948? I see so much disdain for latter, with people saying that UN had no right to make that declaration, but the same people seem to be praising the former. In both cases you have a population living in these places saying they should have the right for self-determination and self-governance, and that the land belongs to them and they want to the world to recognize that. Plus, in both cases, that recognition of soverignity leaves another group pushed out or with less, and with no say about it. So why is the announcement from earlier this week a positive but the 1948 decision unacceptable? |
We’re going to vote Israel out? Out of what? We’re not on Survivor. |
Bingo. The Palestinian advocates accuse Israel of hypocrisy (justifiably in certain cases), but are equally hypocritical when it comes to the UN resolutions. Ridiculous. |
The West Bank and Gaza holdings were always considered illegally occupied. You cannot say it leaves Israel with less. Israel never officially had them. East Jerusalem is illegally annexed. |
So even if you take that part of it away, even if you say that Israel doesn't end up with less, it still doesn't change the fundamental question. Why is it a positive for the nations of the world to recognize Palestine as a state now but a negative to recognize Israel in 1948? Why is it different? |
Because the Palestinians are now living in an apartheid state, their homes are being stolen and they are oppressed. This is a direct result of Israel existence. So it is right to recognize a Palestinian state and not recognize Israel because without Israel creation the Palestinians would not be in this situation. |