Allocating customers and not competing for customers are textbook anti trust violations. Those cases would be far easier than trying to argue about installed software with search engine preferences. Any one want to bet on whether or not they still share information? |
Collusion! Classic antitrust behavior, and they would lose if an action is brought. |
DP: +1 Yes, it is a practice. If interested in more information about the legality of early decision see: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=mhlr
|
See my post below (9:26). They are still sharing information. The DOJ closed the investigation. |
If you look at the sources for a footnotes, the 223 note cites a 1997 article and 225 and 226 cite a book published in 2003. The DoJ settled another investigation with the National Association for College Admission Counseling in 2019 and part of that settlement related to ED and recruitment rules for students accepted at other schools. For a long time colleges seemed to think they were immune from antitrust law. I don't think they would act that way any more. A kid who backed out of a Dartmouth ED and then had a Harvard RD decision pulled could easily subpoena that list. What is 3x the value of a Harvard degree? |
Do you have anything current? Your article cites sources that predate the investigation by more than a decade |
Yes, but the article is from 2022. I checked my academic databases and cross-checked DOJ. That is the latest information and the DOJ did drop the investigation. They decided to go after NACAC for violating antitrust rules and settled. I'm in higher ed, and I know at least 2 R1 universities that are sharing this information. |
The they should have been able to find recent sources if the practice still exists |
Far more families feel locked in (and colleges don’t dissuade) than back out.
People backing out if very small. Down w ED. You can back out. |
The DOJ opened the investigation in 2018 and settled with NACAC in 2019. The legal review is arguing that that ED is still a problem and not legally binding. To date, the legality hasn't been determined and there are no new cases challenging the practice. The DOJ didn't ask the 30 schools to stop the practice--only to provide information. There is no evidence that they stopped this practice. Why should they if the DOJ dropped the investigation? Anyway, I have no way of proving that it is still happening, so believe what you want. |
Would a public school counselor really refuse to send a final transcript to a non-ED school? Would the counselor even be notified of acceptance to ED school ?
My DS graduated from an MCPS school and was accepted to college ED. He had to request his final transcript for his ED school. The school did not know he had been admitted. I am pretty certain that the counselor would’ve sent the transcript to whichever school he put down on the form. |
The counselor has to digitally sign the ED agreement in order for your kid’s application to be accepted . They most certainly are are aware of where your kid applied ED |
DP. The counselor doesn't receive the decision from the ED school. Kid could just say they were denied. |
Our school has a portal where kids request transcripts. Counselors aren't involved |
Someone likely approves the request. They do at our school even with automated systems. |