Is Trump lawyer Alina Habba becoming a media personality?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Is Trump lawyer Alina Habba becoming a media personality, fashion icon, and is she good or bad for the Trump image?
|
Anonymous
|
About Alina:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alina_Habba |
Anonymous
“…Habba asserted no one had heard of the case, falsely alleging the "fake news" had not reported it. She added that "me and President Trump got sanctioned a million dollars for going against Crooked Hillary" and "there were probably 50 lawyers representing all of the radical left," though the suit had named 31 defendants. Habba also represented Trump in a federal civil lawsuit filed by his former attorney, Michael Cohen. Habba filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, which was granted by Judge Lewis J. Liman on November 14, 2022, dismissing the action in its entirety. Habba also defended Trump's private interests in the Carroll v. Trump case, when she argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that the Federal Tort Claims Act applies to a former U.S. president. The Second Circuit, in a decision dated September 27, 2022, agreed that Trump was an employee of the United States at the time and that the District Court must consider the applicability of the Federal Tort Claims Act to Trump's comments in that light. The Second Circuit decision did not address the merits of Trump's claim that the comments constituted executive action as the President of the United States. In 2022, Trump's Save America political action committee paid Habba's firm almost $2 million in legal fees..” |
Anonymous
| She’s mediagenic for sure |
Anonymous
No she’s a god dammed criminal She owes the IRS millions and she sucks as a lawyer. Worthless as a human literal garbage |
Anonymous
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]About Alina:
[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alina_Habba[/url][/quote] “…Habba asserted no one had heard of the case, falsely alleging the "fake news" had not reported it. She added that "me and President Trump got sanctioned a million dollars for going against Crooked Hillary" and "there were probably 50 lawyers representing all of the radical left," though the suit had named 31 defendants. Habba also represented Trump in a federal civil lawsuit filed by his former attorney, Michael Cohen. Habba filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, which was granted by Judge Lewis J. Liman on November 14, 2022, dismissing the action in its entirety. Habba also defended Trump's private interests in the Carroll v. Trump case, when she argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that the Federal Tort Claims Act applies to a former U.S. president. The Second Circuit, in a decision dated September 27, 2022, agreed that Trump was an employee of the United States at the time and that the District Court must consider the applicability of the Federal Tort Claims Act to Trump's comments in that light. The Second Circuit decision did not address the merits of Trump's claim that the comments constituted executive action as the President of the United States. In 2022, Trump's Save America political action committee paid Habba's firm almost $2 million in legal fees..”[/quote] Yes the idiot pac paid his fees a billionaire has no money She’s an idiot moron republicans think she’s pretty so she’s great wth? The women liters lost the NY case for him and she is going to jail for embezzlement and she coerced a defendant she’s going to lose her law license |
Anonymous
| No |
Anonymous
She's all over the news lately. She has a very Chanel-esque fashion look. She's pretty too in an almost Bella H. way. |
Anonymous
Video: |
Anonymous
Why would Donald Trump use her then? Obviously he can afford good lawyers. |
Anonymous
Is that a gold men's Rolex? |
Anonymous
Not that it matters but I think the suit is St. John not Chanel. Not sure tho. |
Anonymous
Good lawyers won’t touch him. He’s toxic, not even the most conservative firms want to be associated with him anymore |
Anonymous
+1000 |
Anonymous
1) Good lawyers may be unwilling to represent him. 2) He probably agreed to work with her because he thinks she looks the part. We know that's how he evaluates qualifications. |