“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women need to start withholding sex from men—period. Vibrators are better anyway!

Seriously, we need to STRIKE FAST and HARD on this: SEX Ban imposed on ALL Men in Washington Starting Next Monday ( one week from the leak):

No Senator, Congressman, Legislative Aid, Staffer, Head of Communications, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Media personality,Pentagon, CIA, US Atty's Office, FBI office IS GETTING LAID

EVER Again starting NEXT Monday- until a Constitutional Amendment is passed that says, " a woman has domain over her own body and any decision she makes with it is between her and her MD and no law can be passed by Any State or Federal Body Abridging her right to control what enters , grows inside ( or not ) and leaves her own body" " Her gifts to the world are through her own labor and are therefore her own free choice and cannot be compelled"

And as for the " GOOd men" who want to Support us NO SEX for them Either until they Take the defense of US inTo High Gear

Also, Every Actress in America on TV and in Movies SHOULD Effective Next Monday REFUSE to have her sexuality exploited to make profits for Print media, film , TV, online Ads - let hairy , fat men try to sell products using only hairy fat men as Advertising.

ALL WOMEN Report to Washington for Protests: so, no Teaching in schools, no Nursing in Hospitals - You are Needed in Washington Instead

So I have a problem with this line of thinking. First are you really sleeping with someone who is in favor of this ruling? Second it is very transactional. It seems you feel women’s only recourse is to use sex to manipulate or buy men’s favor. Jury nullification is a better track.

The only way men will leave us alone is to put a moratorium on sex or start regulating their bodies.

[Anonymous]

In some face, it is your religious belief to follow medical advice such as in Orthodox Judaism. There are cases where due to medical reasons a woman is advised to get an abortion and that is sanctioned by her religion. So I could see some cases being brought before the court having to do with freedom of religion in that respect

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, with so much political sorting in this country, especially by state, I'm not convinced overturning Roe will be a big significant political event. Yes, it's possible there will be marginal shifts in suburban purple districts. But if local laws reflect he prevailing local opinion, we may see very little effect.

Sure, it's not going to be a big deal in, say, Alabama. But it will be huge in a bunch of states. For example, VA now has a GOP legislature and governor. Those guys are going to be under huge pressure to ban abortion. Abortion will be completely illegal in WI, MI, and AZ based on laws that pre-date Roe and were not enforced because of it. Those states are about 50/50 R/D, so this issue is going to scramble politics there. PA has a GOP legislature that will be under pressure to ban abortion. Currently there is a Democratic governor, but there's an election this year and if a Republican wins, he'd be under pressure to sign a ban, so it will scramble politics there too.

Wish Whites Ferry was still open. I’d throw up a clinic right there. Maybe Point of Rocks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Talk about SPIN!

Yes, they do want to put doctors and women in jail!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Talk about SPIN!

Yes, they do want to put doctors and women in jail!

I love that one. How exactly do they think these abortion bans would be enforced?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women need to start withholding sex from men—period. Vibrators are better anyway!

Seriously, we need to STRIKE FAST and HARD on this: SEX Ban imposed on ALL Men in Washington Starting Next Monday ( one week from the leak):

No Senator, Congressman, Legislative Aid, Staffer, Head of Communications, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Media personality,Pentagon, CIA, US Atty's Office, FBI office IS GETTING LAID

EVER Again starting NEXT Monday- until a Constitutional Amendment is passed that says, " a woman has domain over her own body and any decision she makes with it is between her and her MD and no law can be passed by Any State or Federal Body Abridging her right to control what enters , grows inside ( or not ) and leaves her own body" " Her gifts to the world are through her own labor and are therefore her own free choice and cannot be compelled"

And as for the " GOOd men" who want to Support us NO SEX for them Either until they Take the defense of US inTo High Gear

Also, Every Actress in America on TV and in Movies SHOULD Effective Next Monday REFUSE to have her sexuality exploited to make profits for Print media, film , TV, online Ads - let hairy , fat men try to sell products using only hairy fat men as Advertising.

ALL WOMEN Report to Washington for Protests: so, no Teaching in schools, no Nursing in Hospitals - You are Needed in Washington Instead

So I have a problem with this line of thinking. First are you really sleeping with someone who is in favor of this ruling? Second it is very transactional. It seems you feel women’s only recourse is to use sex to manipulate or buy men’s favor. Jury nullification is a better track.

NOPE . Its just a simple fact that every man on Earth is here because a Woman chose to have sex with his Father and then give Birth to him: Every Law maker, Every power broker in Washington - So NOW its time to Make THAT crystal Clear in as Direct and Painful a way as possible.

Respect us or they get NOTHING More from US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Talk about SPIN!

Yes, they do want to put doctors and women in jail!

Exactly, I was just going to post that. The GOP talking point says: "Forcefully refute Democrat lies regarding GOP positions on abortion and women's health care," it adds, saying Republicans do not want to take away contraception, mammograms and female health care or throw doctors and women in jail.”


But they sure are doing that!! Stupid people need to look at their actions/laws they passed and wake up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So do women not get the right to life anymore?. Last I heard it was in the Constitution and I shouldn't have to give up my life to bring another one into this world

Are you serious? It's not in the Constitution. It's in the Declaration of Independence.

It is in the Constitution, though.

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

So make a law at the federal level

Again, what makes you think this court wouldn’t invalidate that law?

Make sure it follows constitutional guidelines and they won’t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Talk about SPIN!

Yes, they do want to put doctors and women in jail!

Exactly, I was just going to post that. The GOP talking point says: "Forcefully refute Democrat lies regarding GOP positions on abortion and women's health care," it adds, saying Republicans do not want to take away contraception, mammograms and female health care or throw doctors and women in jail.”


But they sure are doing that!! Stupid people need to look at their actions/laws they passed and wake up!

that's just the thing. Most people are stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So do women not get the right to life anymore?. Last I heard it was in the Constitution and I shouldn't have to give up my life to bring another one into this world

Are you serious? It's not in the Constitution. It's in the Declaration of Independence.

It is in the Constitution, though.

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

So make a law at the federal level

Again, what makes you think this court wouldn’t invalidate that law?

Make sure it follows constitutional guidelines and they won’t

I am curious, under what power would the federal government be able to regulate abortions?

[Anonymous]

Yes, the GOP claiming outrage over the leaks as if they were the victims while stripping rights away from half the American population is quite on brand.

I would bet my right arm that the leak came from the right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women need to start withholding sex from men—period. Vibrators are better anyway!

Seriously, we need to STRIKE FAST and HARD on this: SEX Ban imposed on ALL Men in Washington Starting Next Monday ( one week from the leak):

No Senator, Congressman, Legislative Aid, Staffer, Head of Communications, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Media personality,Pentagon, CIA, US Atty's Office, FBI office IS GETTING LAID

EVER Again starting NEXT Monday- until a Constitutional Amendment is passed that says, " a woman has domain over her own body and any decision she makes with it is between her and her MD and no law can be passed by Any State or Federal Body Abridging her right to control what enters , grows inside ( or not ) and leaves her own body" " Her gifts to the world are through her own labor and are therefore her own free choice and cannot be compelled"

And as for the " GOOd men" who want to Support us NO SEX for them Either until they Take the defense of US inTo High Gear

Also, Every Actress in America on TV and in Movies SHOULD Effective Next Monday REFUSE to have her sexuality exploited to make profits for Print media, film , TV, online Ads - let hairy , fat men try to sell products using only hairy fat men as Advertising.

ALL WOMEN Report to Washington for Protests: so, no Teaching in schools, no Nursing in Hospitals - You are Needed in Washington Instead

So I have a problem with this line of thinking. First are you really sleeping with someone who is in favor of this ruling? Second it is very transactional. It seems you feel women’s only recourse is to use sex to manipulate or buy men’s favor. Jury nullification is a better track.

NOPE . Its just a simple fact that every man on Earth is here because a Woman chose to have sex with his Father and then give Birth to him: Every Law maker, Every power broker in Washington - So NOW its time to Make THAT crystal Clear in as Direct and Painful a way as possible.

Respect us or they get NOTHING More from US

I’m not going to respect you untill you stop using caps lock.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So no response on what if the woman wants to give up full custody of the embryo. I feel that The father should have to pay to incubate it somewhere, whether that be a medical lab or a another woman, a surrogate whoever they want. So instead of terminating the pregnancy it can just be moved somewhere else at his expense.

I'll agree to that as soon as a guy can decide to keep a baby the mother does not want and and force her to pay child support for 18 years. A guy has no say at the moment but can be forced to support an unwanted child, fair is fair

[Anonymous]

Also, raise child support payments to include full time salary while a woman is home with her " forced birth baby" for the first 18 months of life- so men pay the woman's salary plus essentials for the baby and RENT

In DC , that should be about $2,500 for rent plus $1,000 for food plus $600 month for health insurance , plus more for supplemental day care ( $1800 mos ) FOR EACh and EVERY Forced Birth= about $6,000 a month every man in DC has to pay a woman who is FORCED to have " his baby"

And , of course, for 18 YEARS

[Anonymous]

I love our people are upset with the ScOTUS violation of privacy. As if that judicial body deserves more privacy than a person