Trump's rambling speech today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of rambling, when a leftist journalist refutes Bidens lies we know the end of 46 is near.

Stand back and stand by. The deniers of tump's endless racist garbage are trying to surface.

Interesting, so is this another one of Trump's "clean fakes"?

Try from 1:00-1:10 in this video.

Trump also LIED about the left coming "violently." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/16/charlottesville-violence-right-left-trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm voting for Trump. So is a majority of the country.

I think you misspelled county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

It's real head scratcher why he doesn't say that instead of rambling about sharks and batteries then. And the bolded seems like an excellent political point. Well, if it were true. And if dementia-addled Trump could actually form a coherent thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Please explain the sharks and batteries.

Batteries?

Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.

So you didn't even listen to his rambling but are trying to tell us what he means. That is next level cope. Seek help. Or spend your life saving on Trump swag. I'm sure he'll foot your bill in the nursing home someday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess, but the message Trump is really conveying is he doesn't want the government designing goods and products and lawyers in air-conditioned buildings who can't change a flat tire on their car to put out regulations "for the betterment of society", because they don't know WTF they're doing.

See the EPA.

You mean Richard Nixon's EPA?

The EPA that turned the picture on the left into the picture on the right:



The EPA that put human health before industry practice and profit and changed LA's air quality: https://www.pbssocal.org/history-society/how-los-angeles-began-to-put-its-smoggy-days-behind

I'm good with the EPA. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Heh don't you get tired of this? I know I am tired of it.

The man can't complete a normal sentence. Wouldn't it be something if he didn't need lickspitters like you having to issue leaned interpretations of his nonsense? And try to convince everyone else that his idiotic babble is akshully super smart?

Are your sacred cows being slaughtered?

More like yours as you look more and more idiotic defending Trump.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I actually love that they don't even need to comment on these crazy things that Trump says. They just need to share them. We get it. Oh boy do we get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just Google Trump's history of racist comments and actions and take your pick from the central park five to ranting about Obama not being born in the United states and on and on. There is plenty to choose from

Even a new one today - he used to joke about ovens in front of Jewish employees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm voting for Trump. So is a majority of the country.

Hahahaha. You're funny. And you really don't know what you're talking about.

Trump has now lost the popular vote twice. He has never made it over 47% of the popular vote. And he's lost votes since the last two times he ran for President. There is absolutely no way that he wins the majority of the country. I think he'll be lucky to get 45% of the vote this time around.

That said, he could win the election the same way he did in 2016, by the quirks of our electoral college whereby the people of low population states like Montana have significantly more election power than the people of high population states like California or New York. The electoral college allows small numbers of people in the very sparsely populated states to swing elections. Trump lost the popular vote by over 2% in 2016 (nearly 3M votes) and he won by about 77K votes in 4 districts that allowed him to swing an electoral college win.

His win in 2016 was because the Clinton campaign made huge mistakes by not canvassing and visiting these smaller rural locations where extra electoral votes were won. Biden did not make the same mistake in 2020. His campaign paid attention to where Trump was trying to get electoral wins and they covered those same districts and prevented Trump from the same sneak attack that won the 2016 election. I expect that Biden's campaign will once again close the door to these sneaky electoral vote wins and that once again Biden will win both the popular and the electoral vote.

But there is virtually zero chance of "the majority" voting for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just Google Trump's history of racist comments and actions and take your pick from the central park five to ranting about Obama not being born in the United states and on and on. There is plenty to choose from

Even a new one today - he used to joke about ovens in front of Jewish employees.

It’s weird that this is getting no traction whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm voting for Trump. So is a majority of the country.

Hahahaha. You're funny. And you really don't know what you're talking about.

Trump has now lost the popular vote twice. He has never made it over 47% of the popular vote. And he's lost votes since the last two times he ran for President. There is absolutely no way that he wins the majority of the country. I think he'll be lucky to get 45% of the vote this time around.

That said, he could win the election the same way he did in 2016, by the quirks of our electoral college whereby the people of low population states like Montana have significantly more election power than the people of high population states like California or New York. The electoral college allows small numbers of people in the very sparsely populated states to swing elections. Trump lost the popular vote by over 2% in 2016 (nearly 3M votes) and he won by about 77K votes in 4 districts that allowed him to swing an electoral college win.

His win in 2016 was because the Clinton campaign made huge mistakes by not canvassing and visiting these smaller rural locations where extra electoral votes were won. Biden did not make the same mistake in 2020. His campaign paid attention to where Trump was trying to get electoral wins and they covered those same districts and prevented Trump from the same sneak attack that won the 2016 election. I expect that Biden's campaign will once again close the door to these sneaky electoral vote wins and that once again Biden will win both the popular and the electoral vote.

But there is virtually zero chance of "the majority" voting for Trump.

His win in 2016 was because Comey kneecapped Clinton on purpose, because Trump worked with Russia and because the media really really wanted to see how a Trump presidency would work out.

[Anonymous]

The shark story - again. Yeah, he's not rambling.

https://x.com/BidenHQ/status/1804592040791122259

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The shark story - again. Yeah, he's not rambling.

https://x.com/BidenHQ/status/1804592040791122259

If you put the “twitter” tags on it when you post, we can see the thumbnail.

[Anonymous]