I’m not denying adverse effects. Don’t misquote me. Making exaggerated claims [“astronomical”] suggests bias on your end though. |
They don't actually need to study every event. Lots of people report things like sore arms, fevers, muscle aches, etc. Those are normal side effects of vaccines, and they aren't going to investigate those. They are only going to look at serious adverse events, of which there are far fewer. |
Unfortunately, we’ve got a free rider problem now. Combined with very, very low mortality for people in their 20s and 30s. |
Isn't it good news that "free riding" is possible and works? That is great for young children. |
Of course they aren't investigating sore arms. But there are many other adverse events to look into like strokes, TTP, ITP, a fib, hearing loss, myocarditis, shingles, brain fog, neuropathy, paralysis, vision loss and issues, myocarditis, deaths, pericarditis, chest pain. Thousands of things to investigate to make sure it's not just coincidence. Might be, but one can't assume. Since trials were 40k people, most adverse events don't show up in the short time or small number. They will then determine if the risk/benefit and what other treatments. Long process and not a given. Some EUA's never make it to approval. What was safe during the surge might not be forever |
What is a free rider problem? |
This pp doesn't like that unvaccinated people (including young children) are benefitting from herd immunity. It's her ax to grind. The hesitant and outright refusing adults deserve to get sick and die, in her opinion. She's on a crusade. Herd immunity benefits our young children, that should be celebrated. |
Exactly. |