They didn't want to spring $$ for a car seat? They also regularly send a pre-schooler over to your house? You may love them, but their actions = takers & users. They should have long ago offered additional money to your nannies. |
+1 |
To elaborate: the cheap neighbor should have offered fair market value to your nanny, OP - not whatever the cheap neighbor "felt like" paying the nanny - which we all know is zero. |
Why can't your nanny tell them how much she charges to watch their kids? |
People like the neighbor approach nannies (instead of the employer) because they believe the nanny will not say no - it's all very deliberate. |
Real friends would not be taking advantage of you or trying to steal your nannies. So I would cut the play dates to maybe once a week and alternate - your kids come to my house (with their adult), my kids come to your house (with their adult). I would absolutely say no to picking up from school even if they split nanny's bill. It's obvious you don't want to share nannies so they need to find their own. |
Ultimately, OP, these people are not your friends. They're using you. Do you want to have friends that are using you?
Your kids have friends, yes. How much time should they be spending with their BFFs? What's reasonable? Also, let your kids develop new relationships with new kids. |
People are different. They offer each other different things. Life is not 50-50. (And BTW people who keep track of how much they give vs how much they get are not friends, either.) Some day OP may need some help from her neighbors. Maybe one of the kids is sick or needs to go to the hospital, her DH is out of town, and the nannies are booked. I imagine asking the neighbor for help and them responding, "Of course! You've had our kids over so many times!! Bring them over here for the night. Anything." |
Tiniest. Violin. Ever. I think OP is smart enough to ask any other neighbor for help, there are plenty to choose from - not the user neighbor - should there ever be this very unlikely yet "inevitable disaster" you speak of. Yes, at the zombie apocalypse, the only neighbor to have the last morsel of food will be you, the user neighbor, according to you, we get it. Happy? Better yet, smear OP's name: "SHE doesn't let neighbors poach her NANNY! The nerve!" Puuulease, people like you would love to guilt OP into letting their nanny be poached - you are not a friend, either. You are just mad that you got found out. Go find your own help and try to pay what OP's neighbor pays - nothing. Zero. Zilch. Zip. No love lost there. |
OP already knows that her kids are welcome at the neighbor's house anytime, and that they'll be unsupervised, every time. That's why she PAY FOR HER OWN NANNY to accompany her children over there. |
I pay my nanny above market rate, lots of vacation days, sick etc. (Don't do medical as she gets through her DH.) I have a somewhat similar situation where there are weeks where I need flexibility in scheduling and nanny knows that I need this flexibility as was part of job description. If I had a neighbor who started hiring her to point it jeopardizes her availability for my needs-I may recognize her right to do so but her value to me is diminished and she won't be the right employee for me. If nanny choose to jeopardize her full time employment with taking on occasional gigs it seems a short sighted decision. She may very well be someone who enjoys cobbling together jobs but that's hard to make a sustainable work life on. |
Huh? You are incoherent. You do realize I am not actually, literally involved in this scenario, correct? |
You certainly seem like you have a vested interested in poaching free help. OP has zero reason to feel guilty about saying an emphatic NO to users who claim to be her friends. |
OP here, so sorry, I missed the extra responses b/c work got crazy. But essentially this is post echoes much of my feelings on this issue. I've already mentioned that we did offer someone regular hours in the morning, but that person didn't want something every day. I guess also, I call them "nannies" but truly, they are just several sitters cobbled together to help us get from about 7am to 5:30 pm, w/ school from 9 to 3. Morning hours are needed only a few times a week due to DH's travel. But I think this poster gets me, I find it strange that this neighbor/friend would hire our people to the point that jeopardizes their availability to us. I'm currently in residency and I truly don't have very much flexibility, I'll often work nights for weeks at a time and we pay a lot extra to have one of these sitters spend the nights when DH travels. Our neighbors know this. On top of that, we have shared the name of an occasional sitter and they had such high expectations of her that they ended up being so disappointed and treating her badly. I do not want that to happen with these sitters. And it's not that we feel like we "own " the sitters, but I hired these people expecting them to work for us, I chose not to go into a nanny share b/c I don't necessarily want them taking other people's opinions into account, I want my kids to be prioritized, and honestly, these women are not the most experienced and I don't think that they would be appropriate to have a 4 kid nanny share, include 2 young ones. They can take morning gigs, but we would be offended if it's people who knew there was a good chance we needed them. Also, we do depend on the neighbors occasionally, and they do depend on us occasionally, we often will take their young one into school, and on occasion they'll take our oldest. We are happy to let the kids play just about every night, we truly do love them, but we'd prefer to be there, so this often occurs right after dinner (or this is how it used to work). I prefer that to them playing every day after school with the nanny in charge. That being said, I think on occasion is find, but I just feel like it's being abused. We also have great relationships with other neighbors and when I took my maternity "leave" I often took care of other people's kids, in part to get to know the families better, in part b/c I truly like helping others, and in part to develop the type of relationship where our kids can play at each others houses and I know that they are cared for and loved. We rarely ask others to help us, but we are really appreciate of it when it happens. Anyways, we try to treat them well, none of the "nannies" worked over the two to three week holiday, and I did give them about 3 weeks pay for bonuses. We do really adore them and really depend on them. Also, just an added thought, it occurred to me that our neighbors have family coming to stay for several months, that means they likely won't be needing our childcare services for a while. Lol. Anyways, we've discussed it with our sitters and I think we're on the same page now. I really appreciate all the thoughtful responses. |
Reminds me of my childhood. The neighbor twins were at our house basically every day. This morphed into my mother cooking them lunch and dinner most days up into high school. It was NEVER once reciprocated—and the neighbors were successful lawyers.
In retrospect their parents were the cheapest sleaziest mooches on the planet. Shameless. They basically used my parents as free de facto daycare for like a decade. |