DP. For one, a democracy is ruled by the majority, and we know that is not is what is happening in American politics. If that was true, Rhode Island and Wyoming residents would not have the same amount of sway in the Senate as California and Texas. A republic system is sought of abstract and rules through elected officials but not necessarily governed by the majority of the populace. |
AI? Please god no. But there are algorithms that have already been created to do just that. Heck, those same algorithms are being used in TX and CA to gerrymander. The underlying problem is that partisan and incumbent protection gerrymandering is legal. |
+1 Republicans started this by insisting they needed to gerrymander Texas in ways that were clearly denying representation to certain groups. California at least asked its voters to approve the new voter maps. Texas just steamrolled everyone/ |
+1 The gerrymandering problem got much worse after computers first got involved decades ago. And a court just affirmed that the Texas redraw is an illegal gerrymander based on race. Regarding Maryland, just heard a good interview with the president of the state Senate reminding everyone that the last time Maryland gerrymandered to make the one Republican district competitive, the courts struck it down and there’s a risk that a court could redraw the map with two Republican seats instead of just the one. |