Red States and Climate Change

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.

Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.

Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.

The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.

Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.

Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.

Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.

Awwwwwww, someone got triggered😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.

Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.

The lower tax rate is funneling money into corporations and billionaires pockets, not saving anything for blue States or red States or addressing the disparity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.

Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.

Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.

Awwwwwww, someone got triggered😆

That poster sure wasn’t wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.

Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.

People now need to take full responsibility for themselves.

If you don't want to pay for NOAA and the NWS, time to check out all flood charts for your area and make sure not to live or vacation or send your kids to camp in those areas.

You wanted personal responsibility Republican voters, now.you have to do the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.

Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.

Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.

The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).

But there were warnings. However, when staffs and resources are cut by the GOP, the ability for analysis and additional warning are cut too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.

Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.

How does lowering the deficit result by lowering taxes?

(this is voodoo economics)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.

Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.

Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.

Awwwwwww, someone got triggered😆

Oh right- thoughts and prayers to those girls!

[Anonymous]

Should have added: now is not the time to talk about the weather.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.

Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.

Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.

The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).

Texas state and local officials might have looked outside and noticed the torrential rain in a watershed at risk of catastrophic flash floods. Do local government officials need satellites to tell them that it is raining and the river is rising? NWS issued flash flood warnings and watches beginning Thursday afternoon. The failure was at the state and local levels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.

Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.

Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.

The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).

Texas state and local officials might have looked outside and noticed the torrential rain in a watershed at risk of catastrophic flash floods. Do local government officials need satellites to tell them that it is raining and the river is rising? NWS issued flash flood warnings and watches beginning Thursday afternoon. The failure was at the state and local levels.

Looking out the window is a stupid solution. Look at all the comprehensive data from the past. Collect reliable, comprehensive data continually , so that you can reliably predict what conditions are going to lead to this result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.

I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.

Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.

Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.

The lower tax rate is funneling money into corporations and billionaires pockets, not saving anything for blue States or red States or addressing the disparity.

You are complaining about red states as takers. Presumably this is because of the taxes. Now you want credit as a blue state for taking money from the billionaires.