This is the answer. And "my kid got into X Ivy+ school ED, therefore he would have also gotten into X Ivy RD" is magical thinking. |
There is no right answer to how to apply to college.
1. If you DO get in ED, yeah you finished early with a decision you love! (Except, when you have buyers remorse and feel like you could have done better...) 2. If you DON'T get into ED, yeah more choice! (Except when all your RD choices fall through...) 3. If you don't TRY for ED, yeah you aren't locked in anywhere and have the ultimate choice set! (Except you threw away your opportunity to get a higher admit rate at a reach school....) I want my kid to be happy and feel like their hard work paid off in some meaningful way, but it isn't looking good : ( |
+1 |
Not all top kids apply ED to the T20s because the T5 don't offer. ED. |
This is true for some private schoools but not others. Many elite colleges have a pattern with certain private schools where their applicants do better than average, but they don't have those relationships with all private schools. I never understand why people who cite stats like this don't recognize that part of the high acceptance rate is that your college counseling office does a good job making sure the right applicants apply, and that your particular private is clearly highly respected by UChicago, which I would think is a good thing! |
Agree! Clearly Chicago does not accept 80% of applicants from every school. |
+1 THIS |
Because the reasoning skills here are abysmal. |
Financial aid within the T20 vary widely. $10-$20K difference. HPSM offer the best - and they don't do ED. |
Yes!! The people who don't like ED for financial reasons don't seem to understand that nothing will "magically change in RD". If you cannot afford it in ED, you still cannot afford it with RD. What they are really saying (IMO) is that they want the opportunity to compare offers, and if they don't get into a "good enough school that costs less", then they might be willing to be Full pay at that $90K school. So they are upset they "cannot do ED". You don't get the advantages of both ED and RD, you have to pick one. |
Those who "hate ED" are upset they cannot really afford to pay $90K at their kid's ED choice. They want the ability to wait and compare. And if the kid doesn't get into "somewhere else that is good enough" they might be willing to fork over $90K/year. So they can "afford it" they just only want to do it if the other options are "not good enough". So they want the best of both worlds (the higher acceptance rate of ED and the choices of seeing all choices with RD/EA). But that's not how it works. |
So then ED is not for YOU. So EA/RD and be done. IMO, I wouldn't have my kid ED to anywhere except their very top choice. We don't play the games of "well this slightly lower school will be a better ED". ED is about your TOP choice. And I know, because my kid was deferred from ED1 at top choice and then decided to wait to hear in RD, meaning they didn't ED2 to their next choice. Now they did get into their "next choice" in RD and are attending, so it worked out. But it would have been nice to ED2 which would have been more of a guarantee. But they wanted to find out about their Top choice ultiamtely |
Many kids at my child’s school got into terrific schools RD! In fact most of our students apply RD, and do well. Don’t let this thread get you down. |
Because they "Want choices" and don't like that ED doesn't allow that. Not smart enough to realize they can use RD if they want "choices" |
Why would he ED to a school that wasn't his top choice? For the life of me I dont' get it. and if you decide to "aim a bit lower to ensure admissions" well then you have to be happy to accept that. For anyone capable of getting into a T50 (which is where ED matters), they should also be capable of understanding the choices and dealing with it. Otherwise do RD and let them delay until April making the decision. |