SO you are not voting, right? Because by this logic, Trump doesn't can't speak to you either. |
What a childish way to decide on a candidate. Do you think a rich man who left his ex wife to raise the children (oldest was 12) has any insight into your middle class struggle? I doubt any candidate has lived mine. I want a president who is not a crazy fascist. I have never in my life had a president who checks all my boxes. I chose the one who didn’t try to overthrow our democracy. Already voted. It was not a difficult decision. |
All I've seen the last four years are democrats trying to overthrow democracy. |
Your rationale of “pick the lesser of two evils” is why we’re stuck in a two party system, where Dem and Republican candidates say every election is life or death and you can’t go third party. When GWB was on the ballot and people voted for Nader it was “life or death.” Well look where we’re at now. We have the choice between a blowhard doofus and a someone without principles who will say anything to get elected, with no foreign policy experience or the ability to speak extemporaneously. I swear every single business owner on Shark Tank would be better than both these clowns, let alone dozens of other politicians and business leaders I can think of, but we have to choose between two crappy options because both parties are colluding to drive out any competition. I’m not playing along. Sorry. |
You should know better. Dems do not think this way. Even when up, Dems are worried. And a recent event is proof not to get hopes up (2016 election). |
What are you smoking? And can I have some? |
What a double standard you've applied to her. And by your logic, you surely cannot relate to The Donald, either. You like being grabbed in the pu$$y? |
Either outcome is gonna be great, but the outcomes that get us closets to 2016 is going to be awesome. So yes Kamala is unbeatable. |
Get your own. You'll find it in the same aisle as democrats trying to pack the Supreme Court, issue executive orders for whatever they can't get passed by congress, the DNC lawfaring the DOJ for their dirty work, and trying to pay off student loans even though all spending bills shall originate in the House of Representatives. Bottom line is when you democrats don't control all the levers of power, you use executive fiat to get your way. |
[citation needed] Remember in 2016 when Hillary Clinton lost? She conceded. Kamala Harris would do the same should she lose. Donald Trump? We already know how this story goes. |
Democrazy is a president reminding people that he's going to swoop down on them with an F-15 and nukes to let them know who is boss. |
Yes, about that democracy....
![]() |
Changing the size of the Supreme Court takes an act of Congress. So you might as well say they're trying to pass universal healthcare, or trying to make DC a state. It's something Democrats would like to see someday but is not a realistic near-term possibility. And no, Biden has done none of these things by executive order. Regarding lawfare: Are you completely disregarding the possibility that Trump could have committed any crimes? He was indicted by grand juries and (in one case) convicted by a jury of his peers. He likes to complain about a two-tiered system of justice, and I think there's something to that - most other defendants don't get their cases dismissed by judges they themselves appointed to that position. |
Pretty sure he has 5 kids. |
Completely agree. Lawsuits to keep Trump off the ballot. Now going after Mayor Adams because he spoke up about illegal immigration. Now saying Virginia. Not listing Biden for classified documents issues but going after Trump. Trying to strike a totally inappropriate deal to get Hunter Biden off while sending many others to jail for the same. And the assault on free speech has been heartbreaking. |