Why is this election any different?

[Anonymous]

Never before has an election mattered less.

Your borders will still be open, your money will still go to Israel and Ukraine, the multicultural rainbow agenda will continue unabated and your rights will dwindle.

The color of the politicians tie that is doing it does not matter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never before has an election mattered less.

Your borders will still be open, your money will still go to Israel and Ukraine, the multicultural rainbow agenda will continue unabated and your rights will dwindle.

The color of the politicians tie that is doing it does not matter

Women's ability to manage their bodies.
Ukraine funding will cease under Trump.
Palestine will cease to exist under Trump.
NATO will no longer be a bulwark to Russian aggression under Trump.
China will run roughshod over the east under Trump as it did during his presidency.

So yes, elections do matter and this one matters most.

Don't trust me? Ask his niece:

While Donald’s life is a labyrinth of lies, he very clearly tells us who he is, and what he will do if this country is so broken that it votes him back in power. There is no doubt that if Donald is afforded a second term, it will end American democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never before has an election mattered less.

Your borders will still be open, your money will still go to Israel and Ukraine, the multicultural rainbow agenda will continue unabated and your rights will dwindle.

The color of the politicians tie that is doing it does not matter

We will have an inept leader until January 2029; that's all we know for sure at this point. There are a few subtle differences between the two from a policy perspective. We must learn from not just this election but what led up to this election so that we aren't stuck with choice between dumb and dumber again in 2028.

[Anonymous]

Only one of them tried to overthrow an election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never before has an election mattered less.

Your borders will still be open, your money will still go to Israel and Ukraine, the multicultural rainbow agenda will continue unabated and your rights will dwindle.

The color of the politicians tie that is doing it does not matter

We will have an inept leader until January 2029; that's all we know for sure at this point. There are a few subtle differences between the two from a policy perspective. We must learn from not just this election but what led up to this election so that we aren't stuck with choice between dumb and dumber again in 2028.

Don’t kid yourself.

Trump is furious that the U.S. government wasn’t “loyal” to him. He will wreak revenge. And most of America will get thrown under the bus.

We won’t have any allies either. They won’t take a second Trump term. And remember who the only country to ever invoke nato’s article 5 was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never before has an election mattered less.

Your borders will still be open, your money will still go to Israel and Ukraine, the multicultural rainbow agenda will continue unabated and your rights will dwindle.

The color of the politicians tie that is doing it does not matter

We will have an inept leader until January 2029; that's all we know for sure at this point. There are a few subtle differences between the two from a policy perspective. We must learn from not just this election but what led up to this election so that we aren't stuck with choice between dumb and dumber again in 2028.

Don’t kid yourself.

Trump is furious that the U.S. government wasn’t “loyal” to him. He will wreak revenge. And most of America will get thrown under the bus.

We won’t have any allies either. They won’t take a second Trump term. And remember who the only country to ever invoke nato’s article 5 was.

Yea, no poop sherlock. Trump sucks. You just figuring this out?

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile in Georgia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Trump has genuinely said that he'll become a dictator if elected. The choice is between democracy and authoritarianism. It's that simple.

Also, he'll be dead in four years.

Trump is the difference.

But progressives are also totalitarian
-Environmental laws and regulations-gas is evil and we must not use
-Pronouns and gender
-Roads and suburbs are evil and must be eliminated
and list goes one

At this point we just need to choose the totalitarian regime we can tolerate.

On the environment, if you want to deny climate change, then sure, we should just continue to use fossil fuels. However, we are seeing more extreme storms in Oklahoma and Texas right now that are coming at a time of year not normal just as one more example of climate change. We are also seeing the renewable energy use right now as extending the US as a an energy exporter, which is a good thing. Why not more of that, while reducing carbon burn tat the same time?

On pronouns and gender...this is like a .01% thing that the right has latched on to. Who cares?

Roads and Suburbs: face it, what we have done for the last century for the built environment has led to many bad results: more pollution, less efficient land use, longer commutes (thus harming the family unit) and horrible health and mental health outcomes. If we know what we are doing doesn't work, then why not try something else?

You prove my point. Again, I am not trying to convince you, just trying to warn about you.

Are you one of the ones griping about not getting insurance coverage on the coasts? Too bad. I don't want to subsidize your Sun Belt fantasy anymore. Don't support climate mitigation efforts. Fine. However, don't look to folks like me to bail you out the next time your house floods or gets totaled by a wild fire. No more FEMA money to rebuild in flood and disaster zones. Let's let the free market work itself out.

See, it is your way or no way. You don't tolerate disagreement or discussion actually because your way is morally superior.

I tolerate plenty of disagreement. You can deny climate change all you want and even actively support policies against that. What I find objectionable is that you're free from the consequences of those decisions. You don't get to have your cake and eat it too. And that's true for healthcare, for worker's rights, for infrastructure, for the social safety when you lose your job or age out, for reproductive and minority rights because at some point, one of these things is going to affect you or someone close to you.

I disagree with all that you just stated. My policy ideas would run counter to your policy ideas. Doesn't mean I hate people and am not seeking the best for them, would just approach it in a way different than you, and I have different ideas on what is best.
Progressives would not tolerate this however. In their minds they have figured out what it best, true wisdom is on their side.

DP. So what are your policy ideas?

If you have ideas to strengthen education and healthcare, ensure our infrastructure, food and water are safe, our country secure from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and keep taxes low - many, many Americans would sincerely be interested in hearing them.