
Sanctuary cities and states should welcome illegals and the democrats who live there should provide for them. It’s what they touted and voted to achieve. Time to put their money where their mouth is. |
They left a warm climate by choice. They are welcome to leave if it’s too cold. |
They left because they were misled and given false promises. |
That's not what Sanctuary City means. It just means they won't enforce federal immigration laws. |
Exactly this. It's easy to claim how "welcoming" you/your city is to immigrants - until you're inundated with them. Even just the tiny fraction of immigrants Abbott has sent to NYC and Chicago have overwhelmed those cities. Perhaps they'll think twice before continuing to insist how "welcoming" they are, now that they have experienced even a miniscule amount of what the border states experience on a daily basis. Time for Biden to sign some legislature, securing the border. |
+1 I wish Abbott would respond by telling Pritzker (publicly) not to worry - that he will be forwarding all correspondence to the White House. Surely Joe will get right on it. |
Tell us that you want to open our border to anyone and everyone without actually saying it. Good grief. I prefer to live in a country with defined borders and lawful entry *only*. You know, like every other country in the world. If this distresses you so, feel free to open your home to illegal immigrants. What's stopping you? |
And? Perhaps they need to learn from experience why those laws are necessary. |
You're either trolling or painfully stupid. Ever hear about HR-2? You know, the Republican bill that passed the House and is now waiting for DEMOCRATS in the Senate to pass it. Get a clue. DP |
Until recently, the only “fixes” put forward by both parties were basically more technology on the border, more staff to process migrants faster (not to deport… but process—catch and release), and more visas (they won’t be a problem if they just come legally so lets make migrating more permissive!). I did not and do not view these as fixes. I’d rather see employers have to hire Americans and forced to pay higher wages or innovate. This is not 1912, we don’t need massive amounts of cheap labor for factories. We do not give land away to homesteaders. Most of our population has at least a high school education (compared to early 20th century where finishing highschool was relatively rare so the migrants coming were pretty much of the same education/skill level) and now even that isn’t good enough to comfortably raise a family. I do not live on the border but I do live in a city that over 30 years was drastically changed because the AG industry attracted a lot of migrants to do farm work. If you don’t see the problems that continuously increasing population with people in poverty causes— the stress on limited resources and public goods, the crime (caused by poverty), the community disinvestment, the overburdened schools, the resentment that comes from seeing people who just recently came here being given things for free that LMC-MC-UMC families have to pay for yourself and either through burden-shifting or taxes also end up paying for newcomers.. It’s always been an uphill battle to explain this to people in metro areas who are insulated from seeing these things first hand—yet they think they understand because they work with migrants who we welcomed here because they’re highly skilled and educated or just wealthy. It’s not the same, and these deep blue cities are finally understanding this. Since they are experiencing it first hand. |
Yeah, no - that's not how this works. Tell us some more of your looney-tune suggestions. ![]() DP |
What? No one misled them or made false promises. What are you babbling about? They were asked if they'd like to go to Chicago, NYC, etc. They said yes. They voluntarily got on the buses that took them to the planned destination. The end. Now tell us about how they were "trafficked" so we can laugh some more at your idiocy. DP |
Well said. |
I consider labor shortages wonderful. I have never known anything bad to come from a labor shortage, and what we are doing with our immigration policy is keeping the labor market in constant surplus. Vernon Briggs Cornell Labor Economist The underlying truth about the immigration battle is that is is fundamentally between those with an insatiable appetite for more cheap, disposable, foreign workers, and those who embrace the social good of tight labor markets. |
How did so many people get so stupid as to believe big corporations when they say they have a worker shortage?
Why are people so naive to believe the fox in the chicken coop? |