The bolded is NOT TRUE. How many times do we have to tell you this? |
|
When is testing (and therefore, I assume, the number of cases) going to pick up in the US? I've been watching https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
While yes, the total cases per day in the US has been increasing, it's been by very few each day. I'm worried there will be an explosion of cases when doctors everywhere finally have access to tests. Especially since so many people aren't taking this seriously because the "numbers" are so small. |
A shame we just gave billionaires tax cuts. And aren’t we innovative enough to find a way to bring down the unit cost? Manufacturing 101. |
I don’t know the answer to your question, but as you probably know the numbers will also explode at some point because the rate of spread is exponential. |
A billion dollars isn’t even that much money for the federal government. |
Yes, we understand you. If you only followed the news....
WHO Has Admitted an Error in Its Assessment of Wuhan Coronavirus Risk The Geneva-based UN agency said in a situation report late Sunday that the risk was "very high in China, high at the regional level and high at the global level." In a footnote, the WHO explained that it had stated "incorrectly" in its previous reports on Thursday, Friday and Saturday that the global risk was "moderate". The correction of the global risk assessment does not mean that an international health emergency has been declared. The WHO on Thursday stopped short of declaring the novel coronavirus a public health emergency of international concern - a rare designation used only for the worst outbreaks that would trigger more concerted global action. The virus, which was first identified in the city of Wuhan in China on December 31, has since infected more than 2,700 people worldwide, including a few cases identified in over a dozen other countries. A 'sizeable' mistake WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is visiting China this week to discuss ways of containing the outbreak, came under intense questioning from reporters on Thursday over his decision not to declare the emergency. Some reporters asked whether the decision was politicised. |
4 million tests would be one sixty-fourth of Bloomberg's net worth. He would help America a lot more by stepping up to fund this rather than paying for ad after ad. |
Yes. But they are currently ticking up more slowly than expected the past few days. The rate of increase has actually dropped (the total has gone up obviously), with today on track for an even lower rate of increase and/or no increase at all. The number of cases reported doesn't even seem to capture the increase we'd expect to see at this point, based on the number of cases we have (especially since no big efforts to contain have been made by any level of government). |
Maybe Trump could chip in. They could match dollar for dollar. |
That looks like a very old article - it says 2700 cases worldwide. |
So...where are the tests? |
Actually, now 29 per CNN recent update. |
This is from Jan 28th. Not really relevant. |
I would have much more faith in a statement that the rate of increase has slowed if we were actually testing people. |