Trump's rambling speech today

[Anonymous]

Trump is going to announce his VP choice at the debate so that all the media coverage will focus on that, regardless of what else happens.

Just watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Heh don't you get tired of this? I know I am tired of it.

The man can't complete a normal sentence. Wouldn't it be something if he didn't need lickspitters like you having to issue leaned interpretations of his nonsense? And try to convince everyone else that his idiotic babble is akshully super smart?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess, but the message Trump is really conveying is he doesn't want the government designing goods and products and lawyers in air-conditioned buildings who can't change a flat tire on their car to put out regulations "for the betterment of society", because they don't know WTF they're doing.

See the EPA.

Clueless. The government isn't "designing" anything. They set standards, and it's industry that comes up with the design to meet the standards. And the standards aren't even remotely arbitrary, they are based on data (much of which also comes form industry), like whether the amount of water we want to consume is sustainable relative to the amount of water that we can draw down from aquifers and reservoirs. And by the way, Trump's anecdotes are absolutely delusional, I've never even remotely had to flush a toilet "10 or 15 times" as he hyperbolically claims.

Oh yeah! Data! Like the SIX FOOT separation to keep from getting Covid-19. Data. Yep. Uh huh!

You understand that at the time, no one knew enough about COVID and erring on the side of caution made sense, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Please explain the sharks and batteries.

Batteries?

Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.

Sure. That’s what he’s saying. He’s not saying that a battery is so heavy that it’s going to sink the boat, followed up by whether you’d then rather abandon ship near the battery or near the shark.

So weird. These aren't things that normal people stay up all night worrying about.

Also it's not what he said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is going to announce his VP choice at the debate so that all the media coverage will focus on that, regardless of what else happens.

Just watch.

Let's get into vps at the debate. There has not been a debate since the gallows was built for his last VP so that also can be discussed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

No, the reason for the regulations are (in no order):

1) the health and safety of workers
2) guardrails on limited resources like clean air and water
3) consumer protections

If corporations had their way, there wouldn't a limit on the number of hours one worked each week, or a minimum amount of pay, or safe working conditions. There would be no control that what the consumer was buying was in fact what was being sold and there would be no standards in terms of pollution, discharges, etc.

No, not by a long shot. You can use regulation to consolidate markets, run competitors out of business, create favorable conditions to feather your own nest, change investment trends to feather your own nest, etc.

Not all regulation is needed by far. Some of it is just opinions and excuses for "causes" (again, to feather your own nest). Follow the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Please explain the sharks and batteries.

Batteries?

Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.

Sure. That’s what he’s saying. He’s not saying that a battery is so heavy that it’s going to sink the boat, followed up by whether you’d then rather abandon ship near the battery or near the shark.

So weird. These aren't things that normal people stay up all night worrying about.

Also it's not what he said.

What did he say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

Heh don't you get tired of this? I know I am tired of it.

The man can't complete a normal sentence. Wouldn't it be something if he didn't need lickspitters like you having to issue leaned interpretations of his nonsense? And try to convince everyone else that his idiotic babble is akshully super smart?

Are your sacred cows being slaughtered?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is going to announce his VP choice at the debate so that all the media coverage will focus on that, regardless of what else happens.

Just watch.

Why would he want to bring up VPs? He made an absolute disastrous choice last time. Choosing VPs is one of his biggest weaknesses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain the shark and Hannibal Lector fixations, please. I'd like to know how they are so important that they'd be prominently mentioned by a candidate for U.S. President.

+1

All you Republicans are supplying wayyyy more thought to what Trump says than anything he means.

Actually, keep going. You guys are probably safer being kept busy by spinning your wheels on trying to make Trump’s nonsense make sense.

Her ran marketing, real estate and construction. You OTOH don't know WTF you're doing outside of blathering on the intertubes.

“Her” ran marketing, real estate and construction into the ground, yes. Well noted, good foot soldier!

And now he can’t conduct a paragraph without getting lost in the weeds.

Here's the weeds: he has about 505 businesses under the Trump name. Maybe a dozen have gone under. Have a nice day.

You keep trying to make sense of his madness and you can’t even get this right. Having “businesses under name” isn’t really running a business.

You keep sending him money though. Why do you need to send a tithe to Trump every month when he’s such a stellar businessman? Also, how did he managed to bankrupt a casino? Maybe that’s why you’re so protective of him and so eager to try and apply sense to his Hannibal Lector musings: it’s more about you than it is about him.

It’s just a matter of days before he says something even crazier and less easier to track.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of rambling, when a leftist journalist refutes Bidens lies we know the end of 46 is near.

Stand back and stand by. The deniers of tump's endless racist garbage are trying to surface.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain the shark and Hannibal Lector fixations, please. I'd like to know how they are so important that they'd be prominently mentioned by a candidate for U.S. President.

+1

All you Republicans are supplying wayyyy more thought to what Trump says than anything he means.

Actually, keep going. You guys are probably safer being kept busy by spinning your wheels on trying to make Trump’s nonsense make sense.

Her ran marketing, real estate and construction. You OTOH don't know WTF you're doing outside of blathering on the intertubes.

“Her” ran marketing, real estate and construction into the ground, yes. Well noted, good foot soldier!

And now he can’t conduct a paragraph without getting lost in the weeds.

Here's the weeds: he has about 505 businesses under the Trump name. Maybe a dozen have gone under. Have a nice day.

You keep trying to make sense of his madness and you can’t even get this right. Having “businesses under name” isn’t really running a business.

You keep sending him money though. Why do you need to send a tithe to Trump every month when he’s such a stellar businessman? Also, how did he managed to bankrupt a casino? Maybe that’s why you’re so protective of him and so eager to try and apply sense to his Hannibal Lector musings: it’s more about you than it is about him.

It’s just a matter of days before he says something even crazier and less easier to track.

How can I answer? My original post disappeared?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain the shark and Hannibal Lector fixations, please. I'd like to know how they are so important that they'd be prominently mentioned by a candidate for U.S. President.

+1

All you Republicans are supplying wayyyy more thought to what Trump says than anything he means.

Actually, keep going. You guys are probably safer being kept busy by spinning your wheels on trying to make Trump’s nonsense make sense.

Her ran marketing, real estate and construction. You OTOH don't know WTF you're doing outside of blathering on the intertubes.

“Her” ran marketing, real estate and construction into the ground, yes. Well noted, good foot soldier!

And now he can’t conduct a paragraph without getting lost in the weeds.

Here's the weeds: he has about 505 businesses under the Trump name. Maybe a dozen have gone under. Have a nice day.

You keep trying to make sense of his madness and you can’t even get this right. Having “businesses under name” isn’t really running a business.

You keep sending him money though. Why do you need to send a tithe to Trump every month when he’s such a stellar businessman? Also, how did he managed to bankrupt a casino? Maybe that’s why you’re so protective of him and so eager to try and apply sense to his Hannibal Lector musings: it’s more about you than it is about him.

It’s just a matter of days before he says something even crazier and less easier to track.

You let me know when Joe Biden has run a business or done anything in private industry (or the people around him for that matter).

It would be nice if we didn't just have professional politicians trying to constantly run our lives from ivory towers. I don't think I'm alone in that belief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is this

One of his weird fixations. He's fixated on water-efficient plumbing fixtures, windmills, sharks, cognitive testing. He's a massively insecure person, and mean and arrogant to boot.

No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.

The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.

They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).

He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!

No, the reason for the regulations are (in no order):

1) the health and safety of workers
2) guardrails on limited resources like clean air and water
3) consumer protections

If corporations had their way, there wouldn't a limit on the number of hours one worked each week, or a minimum amount of pay, or safe working conditions. There would be no control that what the consumer was buying was in fact what was being sold and there would be no standards in terms of pollution, discharges, etc.

No, not by a long shot. You can use regulation to consolidate markets, run competitors out of business, create favorable conditions to feather your own nest, change investment trends to feather your own nest, etc.

Not all regulation is needed by far. Some of it is just opinions and excuses for "causes" (again, to feather your own nest). Follow the money.

The money is with the GOP enabled Oligarchs. It is pretty easy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of rambling, when a leftist journalist refutes Bidens lies we know the end of 46 is near.

We all saw and heard this with our own eyes and ears.