“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

What ivf practice is going to want to operate in a red state? Forget it. Anyone that needs ivf will need to go to a blue state.

Just like they already do for health care and education. It's almost like the blue states are doing something right huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Me too. I find it especially weird coming from people who believe for other people that when God doesn’t grant you favor it means you did something wrong and it’s a punishment. If it’s a punishment from God, why are you trying to do the opposite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Don’t be uglier than necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Something like that, yes.
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/10/is-amy-coney-barrett-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-ivf/?amp=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This will also lead to more women murdered by their partners. When he wants an abortion she can't have, murder will happen. It happens already, but will happen more. Will also increase domestic violence and prevent women from being able to leave.

+1
It’s absolutely immoral and depraved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back: is anyone honestly shocked by this? I’m not. Are people really surprised by the apparent majority opinion, or Roberts getting infuriated by the leak? None of this can be called surprising in the truest sense of the word, right?

I am not shocked. This outcome was obvious the night of November 8, 2016. That's the night I grieved for the end of Roe. v. Wade because it was obvious that it would be the end.

And pay attention to who is "infuriated" by the leak. It's theater by the Right to make this about the "leaker" who is clearly also from the Right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Don’t be uglier than necessary.

They’re sharing an anecdote about their friends. It’s not like they’re trying to take healthcare away from women or anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Don’t be uglier than necessary.

They’re sharing an anecdote about their friends. It’s not like they’re trying to take healthcare away from women or anything.

Still ugly. But we both knew that, and I’m no fan of Christian extremism - or our healthcare system at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back: is anyone honestly shocked by this? I’m not. Are people really surprised by the apparent majority opinion, or Roberts getting infuriated by the leak? None of this can be called surprising in the truest sense of the word, right?

I am not shocked. This outcome was obvious the night of November 8, 2016. That's the night I grieved for the end of Roe. v. Wade because it was obvious that it would be the end.

And pay attention to who is "infuriated" by the leak. It's theater by the Right to make this about the "leaker" who is clearly also from the Right.

My guess is the Roberts investigation will come up inconclusive, but it would be really awesome if they actually were able to pin Alito or one of the other GOP justices with doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

What ivf practice is going to want to operate in a red state? Forget it. Anyone that needs ivf will need to go to a blue state.

Already ivf is skewed to wealthy and now it will be for wealthy blue staters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Don’t be uglier than necessary.

They’re sharing an anecdote about their friends. It’s not like they’re trying to take healthcare away from women or anything.

I mean all the ones that IVF failed for were good Christians in my experience. It’s like god really said no- a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about IVF?. If too many eggs are fertilized, they typically abort some to give the others a higher chance of surviving as well as the mother. This would not be allowed now

Didn’t ACB make some kind of comment in a speech about IVF, suggesting that she has it on a private list of things shed like to make impossible in this country?

Well that's funny because all of the people that I know that are using IVF are good Christian people who God didn't seem to want to bless with children. Lol

Don’t be uglier than necessary.

They’re sharing an anecdote about their friends. It’s not like they’re trying to take healthcare away from women or anything.

Still ugly. But we both knew that, and I’m no fan of Christian extremism - or our healthcare system at all.

I… don’t care. It is what it is and a lot of Christians have made their decisions (and I am Christian). They always think the punishment and pain will be carried by those who “deserve” it and I am out of ducks on that regard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stepping back: is anyone honestly shocked by this? I’m not. Are people really surprised by the apparent majority opinion, or Roberts getting infuriated by the leak? None of this can be called surprising in the truest sense of the word, right?

I am not shocked. This outcome was obvious the night of November 8, 2016. That's the night I grieved for the end of Roe. v. Wade because it was obvious that it would be the end.

And pay attention to who is "infuriated" by the leak. It's theater by the Right to make this about the "leaker" who is clearly also from the Right.

My guess is the Roberts investigation will come up inconclusive, but it would be really awesome if they actually were able to pin Alito or one of the other GOP justices with doing it.

It was totally Ginni.

[Anonymous]

So no response on what if the woman wants to give up full custody of the embryo. I feel that The father should have to pay to incubate it somewhere, whether that be a medical lab or a another woman, a surrogate whoever they want. So instead of terminating the pregnancy it can just be moved somewhere else at his expense.