Official RNC convention thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.


Too bad you people couldn’t have respected him while he was in office. Of course he got it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He has NO plan and rambled for an hour and a half about a fictional character who he thinks is dead, but the actor is alive and the character never dies in the movie.

He also has no idea who the gov of WI is.


Oh so no plan to put people in “camps?”

Which one is it, a rambling plan less guy speaking incorrectly about fictional characters, or Hitler reborn with plans to imprison millions of people on American soil for an unspecified reason?

Tom Homan was Trump’s director of ICE, authored Project 25, and will be Trump’s DHS director. Here’s his plan as delivered in a keynote speech at the RNC the other night.

WhAt MaKeS yOu ThInK tHeY wIlL dEpOrT pEoPlE? TrUmP hAs NoThInG tO dO wItH pRoJeCt2025.


If you listen to his entire speech, rather than your carefully selected sound bite, he is saying the CARTELS will be wiped off the face of the earth. Which sounds good to me. But do keep peddling misinformation.

But the US has no authority to do that, no? That would be like Canada saying they are going after the Bloods and the Crips.


I refer you to 20:06. Please stop being so literal. No one is declaring war on Mexico. :roll:


Ah ok so it was just another campaign lie. One of hundreds, spoken throughout the RNC convention.


I don't recall anyone saying they were going to "declare war on Mexico." Just you. Please post the exact quote you're referring to.


DP, but how are we going to wipe cartels located in Mexico "off of the earth" without military action in Mexico. Military action the government of Mexico has said they do not want.


Again, I refer you to Tim Kaine’s (D) recent letter:

I also met with the Mexican Consul Generals to talk about how we can strengthen U.S.-Mexico cooperation to combat drug trafficking. In the Senate, I’ve been working hard on this issue and I’m proud that last year significant portions of my bipartisan Disrupt Fentanyl Trafficking Act were signed into law to direct increased federal attention to fentanyl trafficking and involve Mexico as an active partner to disrupt cartel activity in Mexico. I also helped pass a supplemental national security funding package that included the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, bipartisan legislation I cosponsored, to strengthen the Treasury Department’s ability to sanction transnational criminal organizations and others that launder money to facilitate opioid trafficking.


This is an informative deflection, but still a deflection.

No one is suggesting we just do nothing about the Mexican drug cartels. If that's the standard then we can agree there are bipartisan efforts on this issue and support those efforts.

The issue is that Mexico has stated that it does not want US troops on their soil and yet people like Homan keep suggesting it.


He suggested no such thing. “Wiping cartels off the face of the earth” is hyperbole that most people understand. There are ways to wipe out cartels that don’t involve war. Most people grasp what he was getting at.


You Republicans are CONSTANTLY having to explain that Trump didn't mean exactly what he said. How do you live with that kind of cognitive dissonance? Why do you want a leader who doesn't say what he means? Who talks in "hyperbole"? Does he not mean he's going to immediately round up 11 million migrants and send them off...somewhere that will accept them? Anyone who deals in logistics knows that is just a ridiculous thing to propose. Is that a hyperbole then?

Can we trust him when he says he's not going to pursue a national abortion ban, or is that also hyperbole that we can disregard, knowing he will in fact pursue it?

When does he speak in hyperbole and when does he say the truth, which is what you always would say was appealing about him? Get your stories straight.


DP. Spare us all your lectures about needing to explain what is really meant. Remember smug liberals sniffing that we “just didn’t understand” what Defund the Police meant and that you would explain it to us - over and over, ad nauseam? Democrats are (unfortunately) masters of idiotic catchphrases that then have to be walked back because they don’t mean what they were meant to mean. Maybe work on your own messaging before sanctimoniously telling Republicans to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.


Too bad you people couldn’t have respected him while he was in office. Of course he got it.


Even Nixon looks good when compared to Trump.
Anonymous
Just tuned in to Bloatus’s Michigan rally for a few minutes and he’s talking about sharks again! He’s batshit crazy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Just tuned in to Bloatus’s Michigan rally for a few minutes and he’s talking about sharks again! He’s batshit crazy.


He even did some meta commentary for triggered folx like you explaining that the sharks are just an analogy!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He has NO plan and rambled for an hour and a half about a fictional character who he thinks is dead, but the actor is alive and the character never dies in the movie.

He also has no idea who the gov of WI is.


Oh so no plan to put people in “camps?”

Which one is it, a rambling plan less guy speaking incorrectly about fictional characters, or Hitler reborn with plans to imprison millions of people on American soil for an unspecified reason?

Tom Homan was Trump’s director of ICE, authored Project 25, and will be Trump’s DHS director. Here’s his plan as delivered in a keynote speech at the RNC the other night.

WhAt MaKeS yOu ThInK tHeY wIlL dEpOrT pEoPlE? TrUmP hAs NoThInG tO dO wItH pRoJeCt2025.


If you listen to his entire speech, rather than your carefully selected sound bite, he is saying the CARTELS will be wiped off the face of the earth. Which sounds good to me. But do keep peddling misinformation.

But the US has no authority to do that, no? That would be like Canada saying they are going after the Bloods and the Crips.


I refer you to 20:06. Please stop being so literal. No one is declaring war on Mexico. :roll:


Ah ok so it was just another campaign lie. One of hundreds, spoken throughout the RNC convention.


I don't recall anyone saying they were going to "declare war on Mexico." Just you. Please post the exact quote you're referring to.


DP, but how are we going to wipe cartels located in Mexico "off of the earth" without military action in Mexico. Military action the government of Mexico has said they do not want.


Again, I refer you to Tim Kaine’s (D) recent letter:

I also met with the Mexican Consul Generals to talk about how we can strengthen U.S.-Mexico cooperation to combat drug trafficking. In the Senate, I’ve been working hard on this issue and I’m proud that last year significant portions of my bipartisan Disrupt Fentanyl Trafficking Act were signed into law to direct increased federal attention to fentanyl trafficking and involve Mexico as an active partner to disrupt cartel activity in Mexico. I also helped pass a supplemental national security funding package that included the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, bipartisan legislation I cosponsored, to strengthen the Treasury Department’s ability to sanction transnational criminal organizations and others that launder money to facilitate opioid trafficking.


This is an informative deflection, but still a deflection.

No one is suggesting we just do nothing about the Mexican drug cartels. If that's the standard then we can agree there are bipartisan efforts on this issue and support those efforts.

The issue is that Mexico has stated that it does not want US troops on their soil and yet people like Homan keep suggesting it.


He suggested no such thing. “Wiping cartels off the face of the earth” is hyperbole that most people understand. There are ways to wipe out cartels that don’t involve war. Most people grasp what he was getting at.


You Republicans are CONSTANTLY having to explain that Trump didn't mean exactly what he said. How do you live with that kind of cognitive dissonance? Why do you want a leader who doesn't say what he means? Who talks in "hyperbole"? Does he not mean he's going to immediately round up 11 million migrants and send them off...somewhere that will accept them? Anyone who deals in logistics knows that is just a ridiculous thing to propose. Is that a hyperbole then?

Can we trust him when he says he's not going to pursue a national abortion ban, or is that also hyperbole that we can disregard, knowing he will in fact pursue it?

When does he speak in hyperbole and when does he say the truth, which is what you always would say was appealing about him? Get your stories straight.


DP. Spare us all your lectures about needing to explain what is really meant. Remember smug liberals sniffing that we “just didn’t understand” what Defund the Police meant and that you would explain it to us - over and over, ad nauseam? Democrats are (unfortunately) masters of idiotic catchphrases that then have to be walked back because they don’t mean what they were meant to mean. Maybe work on your own messaging before sanctimoniously telling Republicans to.


Spare us your lousy attempt at deflecting the question and answer it: how to you manage the constant, unrelenting, ridiculous cognitive dissonance? Your guy is awful. He says things that are awful. And your rationalizations get more ridiculous and desperate by the day.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.


Too bad you people couldn’t have respected him while he was in office. Of course he got it.

+1 !!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just tuned in to Bloatus’s Michigan rally for a few minutes and he’s talking about sharks again! He’s batshit crazy.


He even did some meta commentary for triggered folx like you explaining that the sharks are just an analogy!


Please…he doesn’t know what the word “analogy” means. Audience looked bored. He needs some new material.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.


Too bad you people couldn’t have respected him while he was in office. Of course he got it.

+1 !!


Too bad you people couldn’t vote for a normal Republican like Bush but just went for the one who triggered the libs.
Anonymous
Michigan rally…

—2020 election rigged (USA! USA! USA!)

—Alphonse Capone was ultra MAGA

—Dems are radical communist, fascist thugs (what happened to the new spirit of “unity”?).

Ear gauze is much smaller. MAGAs will have to adjust the size of their bandages.
Anonymous
Trump in a moment of clarity and honesty:



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Trump in a moment of clarity and honesty:




As I’ve said, the doofus accidentally tells the truth sometimes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Grudging respect for Dubya…at least he got it. Worth a watch. If only he would speak out now.



Wow.


Too bad you people couldn’t have respected him while he was in office. Of course he got it.

+1 !!


Too bad you people couldn’t vote for a normal Republican like Bush but just went for the one who triggered the libs.


You never considered him a "normal Republican" - remember when he was considered the anti-Christ by you LWNJs? I sure do. Too bad you couldn't have respected him at the time rather than overreacting (as usual) and calling him the devil incarnate. Do you have any idea how utterly absurd you looked then - and now?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He has NO plan and rambled for an hour and a half about a fictional character who he thinks is dead, but the actor is alive and the character never dies in the movie.

He also has no idea who the gov of WI is.


Oh so no plan to put people in “camps?”

Which one is it, a rambling plan less guy speaking incorrectly about fictional characters, or Hitler reborn with plans to imprison millions of people on American soil for an unspecified reason?

Tom Homan was Trump’s director of ICE, authored Project 25, and will be Trump’s DHS director. Here’s his plan as delivered in a keynote speech at the RNC the other night.

WhAt MaKeS yOu ThInK tHeY wIlL dEpOrT pEoPlE? TrUmP hAs NoThInG tO dO wItH pRoJeCt2025.


If you listen to his entire speech, rather than your carefully selected sound bite, he is saying the CARTELS will be wiped off the face of the earth. Which sounds good to me. But do keep peddling misinformation.

But the US has no authority to do that, no? That would be like Canada saying they are going after the Bloods and the Crips.


I refer you to 20:06. Please stop being so literal. No one is declaring war on Mexico. :roll:


Ah ok so it was just another campaign lie. One of hundreds, spoken throughout the RNC convention.


I don't recall anyone saying they were going to "declare war on Mexico." Just you. Please post the exact quote you're referring to.


DP, but how are we going to wipe cartels located in Mexico "off of the earth" without military action in Mexico. Military action the government of Mexico has said they do not want.


Again, I refer you to Tim Kaine’s (D) recent letter:

I also met with the Mexican Consul Generals to talk about how we can strengthen U.S.-Mexico cooperation to combat drug trafficking. In the Senate, I’ve been working hard on this issue and I’m proud that last year significant portions of my bipartisan Disrupt Fentanyl Trafficking Act were signed into law to direct increased federal attention to fentanyl trafficking and involve Mexico as an active partner to disrupt cartel activity in Mexico. I also helped pass a supplemental national security funding package that included the FEND Off Fentanyl Act, bipartisan legislation I cosponsored, to strengthen the Treasury Department’s ability to sanction transnational criminal organizations and others that launder money to facilitate opioid trafficking.


This is an informative deflection, but still a deflection.

No one is suggesting we just do nothing about the Mexican drug cartels. If that's the standard then we can agree there are bipartisan efforts on this issue and support those efforts.

The issue is that Mexico has stated that it does not want US troops on their soil and yet people like Homan keep suggesting it.


He suggested no such thing. “Wiping cartels off the face of the earth” is hyperbole that most people understand. There are ways to wipe out cartels that don’t involve war. Most people grasp what he was getting at.


You Republicans are CONSTANTLY having to explain that Trump didn't mean exactly what he said. How do you live with that kind of cognitive dissonance? Why do you want a leader who doesn't say what he means? Who talks in "hyperbole"? Does he not mean he's going to immediately round up 11 million migrants and send them off...somewhere that will accept them? Anyone who deals in logistics knows that is just a ridiculous thing to propose. Is that a hyperbole then?

Can we trust him when he says he's not going to pursue a national abortion ban, or is that also hyperbole that we can disregard, knowing he will in fact pursue it?

When does he speak in hyperbole and when does he say the truth, which is what you always would say was appealing about him? Get your stories straight.


DP. Spare us all your lectures about needing to explain what is really meant. Remember smug liberals sniffing that we “just didn’t understand” what Defund the Police meant and that you would explain it to us - over and over, ad nauseam? Democrats are (unfortunately) masters of idiotic catchphrases that then have to be walked back because they don’t mean what they were meant to mean. Maybe work on your own messaging before sanctimoniously telling Republicans to.


Spare us your lousy attempt at deflecting the question and answer it: how to you manage the constant, unrelenting, ridiculous cognitive dissonance? Your guy is awful. He says things that are awful. And your rationalizations get more ridiculous and desperate by the day.


"Deflecting"? I just pointed out the utter projection in every post you write. You have no ground to stand on - NONE - telling Republicans that we suffer from "cognitive dissonance" when Democrats have done so for decades now. Grow up. Oh, and "your guy" is awful too.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: