+1 I ADORE dogs, have had them as a child and an adult and I am flabbergasted at the posters who think that dogs should be allowed off-leash where it is not legal (or if not allowed, asked very politely and gently to comply with the law as opposed to threatened) and that parents trying to keep their kids away from dogs are overzealous. WTF. If I was out with my dog and he wasn't on the leash, and a parent yelled "Hey, leash your fucking dog!" I'd do it and they'd be right. |
|
I read the AU park thread.
I feel terrible for the mother whose child was attacked, having been attacked by a dog myself when I was younger. But one of the posters on that thread was shockingly 'in your face' and aggressive, and wrote a very confrontational message to another woman who was reasonable and diplomatic, and simply presented her point of view, which was not outrageous. I found this woman's tone ("no one is going to walk an unleashed dog in front of MY house" or something like that) in really poor taste, reactionary, un-neighborly (to smack someone down like that on a public forum) - in a word, obnoxious. And I am NOT someone who also posted to that thread, I was just a reader of the thread. |
Thanks for posting this. People can act terribly on all sides when something like this happens, for sure. |
I will say that as someone who lives in an apartment and keeps my dog on a leash 100% of the time except for those rare occasions when we either make it to a dog park or to a friend's house with a fenced in back yard, people who let their little kids loose in the dog park drive me nuts. My dog is the sweetest thing with kids. He'll be very calm, and sit there and let them pat him, but when he's in a dog park and allowed to freely chase a ball, he's moving fast. Once he collided with a German Shorthair Pointer (a midsized dog, maybe twice as big as my 25 lb dog) and both dogs walked away limping. If he hit a toddler at that speed he could send him or her flying, which is a chance I'm not willing to take. So when a parent brings their 2 or 3 year old to the dog park to "see" the dogs, I call him over and keep him close. If someone has a dog and a kid, I can kind of understand it, and if your kid is in a carrier or your arms, that's fine, but I often see people come in with a toddler and it pisses me off. |
| Pepper spray 'em (the off-leash dogs, not the kids) |
|
Have you ever tried to reason with a toddler? Sometimes kids move quicker than parents which is why leashes are so important. |
People who choose not to have children and obsess over dogs are pathetic and selfish. |
Thank you. I wish all dog owners were as reasonable as you two are. |
OP, I live in CCDC near Lafayette and recently had a very pleasant email communication with our police commander, asking him to have an officer patrol the upper park duing high kid traffic hours (weekend mornings). The CCDC listserv has the same crazy arguments as this thread about once a year so I didnt bother to post there first. same experience as you - playful dogs chasing balls or sticks, noy looking to eat children, but on the playground where my kids are. They run down from the field where there is sort of a neighborhood truce about off leash dogs, and the owners stand there halfhartedly calling the dogs. I got taken out at the knees once, and we've had plenty of hand sniffers, owner nowhere around. My older kid is afraid of dogs, and while I'm om with the 'truce' on the firle, when the dogs creep down to the swings and climbers, i draw the line. Dog owners, if you let them run free at Lafayette, Commander Reese is on the task. Oh, and he also told me to all 911 if i see it. |
| Ok with the truce on the upper field, that should say! |
I'm sure it would make you very happy if this were true, but it's not. Usually there is a warning and a requirement that the dog be muzzled when going out in public. If the owner cannot satisfy the requirements, then the dog might be put down. |
Would be great if Commander Reese could also police Lincoln and Garfield parks in Capitol Hill. PP, you describe Lincoln Park as, "a bit of a de facto dog park", and it is exactly this mushy attitude toward unleashed dogs there that has resulted in many many unleashed dogs there at all times of the day. We just quit going there altogether. |
|
I'm the PP who called lincoln park a bit of a de facto dog park. I keep my dog leashed at all times and believe leash laws are there for a reason. So I'm not sure what you mean about my mushy attitude - I'm just observing that there are dogs there constantly.
I wonder, though, if you realize that the dogs were there first? It was "a bit of a de facto dog park" long before the playgrounds were built and mommies from the Hill started to deign to go into those NE nabes. So.....I get it, I do, and I don't leave my dog unleased, ever, but I also don't get this hysteria over sharing the park with the dogs who were THERE FIRST. |
How does it matter if the dogs were there first? The park was never a dog park. And even if it had been - functions change. If a street was converted into a pedestrian zone you also wouldn't defend people continuing to drive through it, saying "the cars were there FIRST!". |