While I did say fascinating above, I am not the poster in the prior thread who used the same description. |
They're non-feeder spots according to the person I spoke with at My School DC, which goes to non-feeder kids and kids that didn't get a feeder preference spot. But I think it's pretty unrealistic to think that there would be so many empty seats that there would be any leftover once the expansion classes start to matriculate. |
Both posts are from me, and I find both topics interesting. The data doesn't report numbers less than 10, so we have to be aware of that gap-- if every JR feeder sent 9 kids to each DCI feeder, that would be a lot of kids in total, right? And 1:1 conversation is a way to fill that in. When someone I know opts out of DCI for BASIS, Latin, or whatever, I'm interested to hear their reasons even though it's anecdotal. |
We live in-bounds for Bunker Hill and Brookland Middle but send our kids to a DCI feeder. It's absolutely nuts (statistically speaking) 1) how many different charter schools enroll kids from Bunker Hill/Brookland and 2) how many children stay out of Bunker Hill/Brookland for the DCI feeder/DCI path. |
I was also under the impression that they have to offers some non-feeder seats per their charter agreement and (presuming from) prior year lottery data, so I checked. Looks like we were wrong: https://dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/media/file/DCI-Restated-Agreement-2014_0.pdf "3.2 Enrollment. A. Pursuant to §38-1802.01(c-1) of the Act, enrollment in DCI shall be open to students in such grades who are residents of the District of Columbia, with priority given to students who are matriculating from any one of the Member Schools (“Continuing Member School Students”) in each case to the extent of the number of seats reserved for the Continuing Students from each Member School. Students who are not residents of the District of Columbia may be enrolled at DCI to the extent permitted by §38-1802.06 of the Act. DCI shall determine whether each student resides in the District of Columbia according to guidelines established by the D.C. Office of the State Superintendent of Education (“OSSE”)." Their five year report advises them to expand enrollment in order to accomodate incoming sixth graders from member schools AND applicants who don't have the member school designation. But, as others have said, there's the question of space. https://dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/media/file/2019-2-28-DCI-5-Year-Review_Redacted_0.pdf "The school has thus far been able to accommodate all students from all member schools within its enrollment ceiling and has been able to provide appropriate facilities for incoming students, in addition to having space to admit students applying from schools other than the five member schools. However, most of the member schools have expanded since the formation of DCI, and those that have not yet expanded have indicated they plan to do so in the future. Most recently, E.W. Stokes PCS expanded to offer a campus in Ward 7, the first dual-language public charter school to operate East of the Anacostia River. These expansions typically begin in lower grades, meaning that larger matriculating classes can be foreseen in a few years. Therefore, it is likely that in the next several years, DCI will need to expand its current program to be able to enroll all rising 6th graders from its member schools and accept students from outside the member schools." |
Then what DCI is likely going to do is if there are extra feeder seats not taken say from the French track, then the feeder kids from the Spanish track will have preference and get them and it won’t go to non-feeder kids. Above is the obvious route as DCI was specifically created to provide a middle and high school path for the feeder school, they have a close working relationship with the feeder schools, and it’s to their benefit to have kids coming in who have had many years of the language. |
I suppose it's a policy decision, but if they don't fill with kids wanting to study French, their French program is pretty small. And remember, not all kids matriculating from Stokes are on grade level in French-- some of them may be new to Stokes in the past few years. |
No, feeder students don’t get first dibs on unfilled feeder starts from other schools. They go into the common waitlist with all of the non-preference kids. That’s current policy and not going to matter soon enough when all schools have more graduates than DCI seats. https://dcinternationalschool.org/about-us/faqs/ |
The majority of kids in DCPS got their seats simply because of their address. At least the DCI feeder structure provides equal opportunity to all. |
Wouldn't the feeder kids be on the top of the wait-list? |
No, they would be ranked according to their master lottery number with everyone else. The preference only applies to the feeder school's seats. That's according to the My School DC rep - please call and confirm if you're curious. I would love to know if someone else gets the same answer that I did! |
I called MSDC and asked (among other things) about whether sibling preference could be stacked with feeder preference and was told that DCI has not yet decided the answer to this question. Essentially, the language in the charter is ambiguous and DCI has never had to make a decision, and so while DCI is aware that they need to make a decision, the current answer is "we don't know whether students will be able to stack feeder preference with sibling preference." |
Gosh I hope they’ll let kids stack the preferences. Right now we are miserable at a feeder (older kids happy at dci) but are afraid to leave and not get dci feeder preference. Icing on the cake would be not getting in dci despite everything. |
+1. I would also add there also are families with other options like ours (move WOTP, private) who are choosing to track into DCI. Friends of DS with older siblings at the school and the families have been happy with their older child’s experiences so far. |
The logic for stacking preferences really doesn't hold at the middle and high school level. Without a school bus system, it makes sense to prioritize having elementary siblings in one location. But by middle and high school, they can commute on their own and stacking preferences makes it much more inequitable for students that don't have an older sibling already. Stacking preferences means that kids with siblings are guaranteed a seat and everyone else has MUCH lower odds. How is that fair to the school community as a whole? |