Republican star: did you know it's super gay for men to have sex with women?

[Anonymous]

Perhaps this belongs in the thread about the CPAC predator - they feel, of a piece

Nick Fuentes’ latest effort to explain why he’s definitely an involuntarily celibate heterosexual makes the least sense yet. The white nationalist said that all sexual activity is “gay,” thus celibacy is the straightest sexual orientation.

Involuntary celibacy is part of the glue that binds the far-right together. The primarily male cohort of incels congregating together online to share their anger and confusion over being shunned sexually is partly credited for the rise in extremism in recent years. The absence of romance in their lives has become a significant component of many incels’ identities.

Even among incels, Fuentes is extreme. He seems to believe that having or desiring sex would destroy him.

Perhaps this is why Fuentes has recently expended significant effort defending his incel status. When he admitted to kissing a girl in high school earlier this year, outraged fans accused him of being voluntarily celibate. In a subsequent episode of his show, Fuentes vehemently insisted that he has no desire to ever kiss a girl again. He didn’t seem to realize that this actually proves their point.

[Anonymous]

Gee, what a shame it would be if Nick Fuentes does not get to contribute to the gene pool.

[Anonymous]

He very much sounds like a homosexual in denial.

I am sure there is a preponderance of frustrated heteresexual males in extreme-right movements, but there are also some homosexual males who cannot reconcile their identities with their ideologies.

[Anonymous]

I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gee, what a shame it would be if Nick Fuentes does not get to contribute to the gene pool.

Truly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

I choose not to take people who make their livelihood as attention-seeking trolls literally. You do as you wish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

I choose not to take people who make their livelihood as attention-seeking trolls literally. You do as you wish.

well i for one am convinced that there is nothing weird here, then

[Anonymous]

IMO, most of the R men who are super anti-gay are probably closeted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
He very much sounds like a homosexual in denial.

I am sure there is a preponderance of frustrated heteresexual males in extreme-right movements, but there are also some homosexual males who cannot reconcile their identities with their ideologies.

MAGA Incels: United for a Closeted Tomorrow!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

I choose not to take people who make their livelihood as attention-seeking trolls literally. You do as you wish.

well i for one am convinced that there is nothing weird here, then

Of course he's weird AF. Most of these troll types are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

I choose not to take people who make their livelihood as attention-seeking trolls literally. You do as you wish.

well i for one am convinced that there is nothing weird here, then

Of course he's weird AF. Most of these troll types are.

Oh I see what you're saying - he's a troll, so don't pay attention to him. I would normally agree except that the trolls have overtaken the Republican party. So not paying attention to the trolls means ignoring the GOP altogether - and I'm sorry but that's just not possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I, too, take everything I hear on the internet at face value.

There is video

Yes, that is why I said hear and not read. Would you prefer watch?

You guys sound like a bunch of oldies trying to dip your foot into internet culture you don't understand.

Please, offer your young personal take

I choose not to take people who make their livelihood as attention-seeking trolls literally. You do as you wish.

well i for one am convinced that there is nothing weird here, then

Of course he's weird AF. Most of these troll types are.

Oh I see what you're saying - he's a troll, so don't pay attention to him. I would normally agree except that the trolls have overtaken the Republican party. So not paying attention to the trolls means ignoring the GOP altogether - and I'm sorry but that's just not possible.

I said I don't take every thing these types say literally. I think he has some perverse views and tires to blur the line between his actual beliefs and his shock content by hiding behind a "troll" persona and whatever brand of humor he claims. Pay attention all you want, but taking stuff like this as gospel is a bit off the mark imo.