Anonymous wrote:It's a twitter linked set of posts that outline how the Russian BOT system was established, how it was directed towards Brexit, the 2016 election, the 2017 French Election and is now focused on Merkel in Germany. The timing of the posts are from 8a to 8p Moscow time and the intensity of the posts correspond to each of the elections.
Anonymous wrote:Here is how the Social Media platform impact our democracy.
https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/900158823515770880
"No Collusion"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope, nothing to see here
https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
The Special Counsel needs a grand jury so he can issue subpoenas. Routine and expected. According to his lawyer, as far as he knows, President Trump is not a target of the investigation. There remains zero evidence of collusion.
Anonymous wrote:Nope, nothing to see here
https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
Anonymous wrote:We have no idea what the Grand Jury is considering. Could it be an immunity plead for Awan on the Clinton Foundation that the FBI has been investigating since 2001 on the Pay for Play scheme?
As for undermining a democracy, can we revisit Obama sending US tax dollars to Israel to try to undermine Bibi's re-election in 2015?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting piece by Daniel Hoffman in the NYT asserting that the Russians were not trying to collude with the Trumps to influence the outcome of the election but rather were deliberately trying to leave bread crumbs to undermine the legitimacy of the American President by arranging the meeting with Don Trump, Jr. Likewise, the Russians undermined Hillary's prospective presidential legitimacy by leaking emails apparently showing a rigged Democratic primary against Bernie.
It would be nice if Mr. Trump would unequivocally acknowledge the Russian meddling and also if fair minded Democrats and objective commentators in the mainstream media would promote unity by focusing on the Russian threat to future elections instead of chasing conspiracy theories that will not lead to impeachment or criminal convictions.
There is no way the Russians would have colluded with the people sitting today in the West Wing. Those folks do not even know how to collude with each to get any significant legislation passed through a Congress controlled by their own party.
We need health care reform in this country and it is not going to happen if we keep giving victories to the Russians in their influence campaign. Trump will be distracted and defensive and Democrats will continue to reflexively resist while the people get hurt. Sad!
The problem with the thesis are some facts:
-everyone involved seems to have lied about 1) russian money and 2) various and multiple meetings
-why was Kysliak brought into Trump Tower via a back door and service elevator rather than the front door in December?
-Why was everyone lying about the April Mayflower meeting?
-Why was everyone lying about the June Trump Tower meeting?
-Why has Trump repeatedly said "no Russia deals" when in fact there are hundreds of Russia deals?
-Why did Trump meet with Putin one on one without the other safties and protocols in place?
-Why did Trump share USIC secrets with the Russian in the Oval Office?
The list goes on and on...
A lot of innuendo there.
Sessions seems to have forgotten some inconsequential meetings. He is an older guy. That is plausible.
Donald Jr. provided accurate but incomplete information to the NY Times. That is not a crime.
A lot of people were brought in through the back door for Trump Tower. Nothing wrong with being discreet. Not everyone wants to be photographed by the media.
Trump apparently chatted with Putin at a large dinner event when he was going to get Melania. That is hardly a secret meeting.
Trump is the president. He can share information with foreign leaders if he deems it appropriate.
Mueller is reportedly looking at the financial issues. There is still zero evidence of collusion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting piece by Daniel Hoffman in the NYT asserting that the Russians were not trying to collude with the Trumps to influence the outcome of the election but rather were deliberately trying to leave bread crumbs to undermine the legitimacy of the American President by arranging the meeting with Don Trump, Jr. Likewise, the Russians undermined Hillary's prospective presidential legitimacy by leaking emails apparently showing a rigged Democratic primary against Bernie.
It would be nice if Mr. Trump would unequivocally acknowledge the Russian meddling and also if fair minded Democrats and objective commentators in the mainstream media would promote unity by focusing on the Russian threat to future elections instead of chasing conspiracy theories that will not lead to impeachment or criminal convictions.
There is no way the Russians would have colluded with the people sitting today in the West Wing. Those folks do not even know how to collude with each to get any significant legislation passed through a Congress controlled by their own party.
We need health care reform in this country and it is not going to happen if we keep giving victories to the Russians in their influence campaign. Trump will be distracted and defensive and Democrats will continue to reflexively resist while the people get hurt. Sad!
The problem with the thesis are some facts:
-everyone involved seems to have lied about 1) russian money and 2) various and multiple meetings
-why was Kysliak brought into Trump Tower via a back door and service elevator rather than the front door in December?
-Why was everyone lying about the April Mayflower meeting?
-Why was everyone lying about the June Trump Tower meeting?
-Why has Trump repeatedly said "no Russia deals" when in fact there are hundreds of Russia deals?
-Why did Trump meet with Putin one on one without the other safties and protocols in place?
-Why did Trump share USIC secrets with the Russian in the Oval Office?
The list goes on and on...
Anonymous wrote:He could sign the sanctions bill, if he really isn't under Putin's thumb . . .