Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "War on Women"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21. However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs. I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions. I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.[/quote] The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere [/quote] “"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133 Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap. [/quote] OK. The fact remains that there is a lone federal judge in a court house and anyone who wants to ensure that they get the most conservative ruling imaginable just has to file in Amarillo [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics