Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Adult Children
Reply to "Inheritance when one child has kids, the other does not "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If one kid refused to have kids but could have had them if they chose to then I would provide more inheritance to the one with kids. [b]Reason: kids are expensive. Single or dink isn’t expensive. [/b] Nothing has to be 50/50. It’s your money and you allocate based on your priorities. [/quote] Being single carries a lot of financial penalties. [/quote] Np- no way. Sure being a DINK is better financially than being single but I’m sure a single person has much better finances than those with kids. I spend 4k a month on daycare. College is $$$. [/quote] Yup! Our friends who choose to be DINKs are in a much better financial position. College is upwards of $200-400K for one kid. Daycare is $10-15K/year for 5 years, then we spent $5-10K on activites/tutoring/etc for each kid. Have 2 kids and it will cost you a million $$$ easily. Now imagine being able to spend that on yourself. [/quote] Having kids is a CHOICE. [/quote]Not having kids is also a choice. But it's only the inheritance giver's choice that matters. Imo, giving should always be distributed based on need.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics