Helen Hunt almost unrecognizable in “I see you”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her skin is awfully smooth. I would say she hasn't had surgery but she has had botox at least.

I agree. Botox or some other kind of injectible?

I really don't think so. Look at the linked photo above- deep expression lines across the forehead wouldn't happen with Botox.

Aftermath of injections/fillers.

Fillers just age super, super poorly.

Not seeing that at all. I think she just looks like she "needs" a lower facelift by standards we expect of Hollywood actresses.

She clearly had fillers. Never, ever get fillers - they will age poorly.

Don't they wear off? or is that your point - you have to maintenance, but the mere fact of having had them means you will look bad even once they are worn off?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That seems very old looking for 58. I know real life 58 yo people who don't look like that. Has she been sick?

OMG. People age differently.

Paul Rudd made a deal with the devil.

[Anonymous]

The lip wrinkles are common among people who have smoked a a long time and smoked a lot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.

My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.

My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.

Straws too

[Anonymous]

I am not an expert of plastic surgery or other interventions and I am not going to speculate on that.

But the argument that she is "unrecognizable" or that her appearance is ONLY explicable by fillers or botox or other interventions? I don't get it. Here is what she looked like in Twister in 1996. She currently looks like this woman, exactly, but 30 years later:



I feel like maybe some folks are simply not familiar with what she has always looked like, to argue she looks so different now. She looks like herself. She may have had some work done, I don't know, but she's also aged. But I would recognize her instantly on the street. She has a number of very striking features and the way her face is composed is distinctive. I think a lot of her popularity as an actress probably owes more to the fact that she had a distinctive face with a strong jaw and a lot of broad planes that came together at sharp angles. That's very camera-friendly bone structure, even if it's not classically feminine or beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.

My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.

Straws too

yup, watch out for your gym water bottle.

[Anonymous]

She has a lot of forehead. Needs a bang. I always thought she was pretty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Helen Hunt had no beauty to lose. A BIPOC actress of such mediocre appearance would never have been considered appealing. What people like is her thinness and whiteness.

Maybe they like her because of her talent. (It seems to never have occurred to some of you.) She is wonderful in both dramatic and comedic roles.

[Anonymous]

Do y’all do a full pucker when you drink from a straw? You don’t use your tongue for suction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not an expert of plastic surgery or other interventions and I am not going to speculate on that.

But the argument that she is "unrecognizable" or that her appearance is ONLY explicable by fillers or botox or other interventions? I don't get it. Here is what she looked like in Twister in 1996. She currently looks like this woman, exactly, but 30 years later:



I feel like maybe some folks are simply not familiar with what she has always looked like, to argue she looks so different now. She looks like herself. She may have had some work done, I don't know, but she's also aged. But I would recognize her instantly on the street. She has a number of very striking features and the way her face is composed is distinctive. I think a lot of her popularity as an actress probably owes more to the fact that she had a distinctive face with a strong jaw and a lot of broad planes that came together at sharp angles. That's very camera-friendly bone structure, even if it's not classically feminine or beautiful.

+1 perfect description

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.

My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.

YES. Annoyingly it’s the only place on my face that makes me look super old. Never smoked.

[Anonymous]

I know what Helen Hunt looks like but in I See You it took me 1/2 the movie to figure out she was the mother. She had no lips and I hardly recognized her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not an expert of plastic surgery or other interventions and I am not going to speculate on that.

But the argument that she is "unrecognizable" or that her appearance is ONLY explicable by fillers or botox or other interventions? I don't get it. Here is what she looked like in Twister in 1996. She currently looks like this woman, exactly, but 30 years later:



I feel like maybe some folks are simply not familiar with what she has always looked like, to argue she looks so different now. She looks like herself. She may have had some work done, I don't know, but she's also aged. But I would recognize her instantly on the street. She has a number of very striking features and the way her face is composed is distinctive. I think a lot of her popularity as an actress probably owes more to the fact that she had a distinctive face with a strong jaw and a lot of broad planes that came together at sharp angles. That's very camera-friendly bone structure, even if it's not classically feminine or beautiful.

+1 perfect description

+1 also, she has thin lips, which often don't age well

[Anonymous]

I recognize her. People are allowed to age.