Trump Doesn’t Know the National Anthem

[Anonymous]

I was simply trying to educate you all on the reality being perpetuated on you by the assembly of witches and warlocks that is the MSM. Liberal eliters right now are shaking there boots over what is happening in my America as President Trump cleans the swamp of all unatural life in favor of God's light and the good things it will bring. What does all this mean to goof people of the outer rings of most liberal cities and ones where a man can let his voice ring free? Well it means no more rub-a-dub, three liberals in a tub, no more=============== anything. Let freedome ring, let freedome sing. Can't we all just get along? TIA

[Anonymous]

And it's time to Build the Walls. Can we at least agree on this? TIA. #MAGA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was simply trying to educate you all on the reality being perpetuated on you by the assembly of witches and warlocks that is the MSM. Liberal eliters right now are shaking there boots over what is happening in my America as President Trump cleans the swamp of all unatural life in favor of God's light and the good things it will bring. What does all this mean to goof people of the outer rings of most liberal cities and ones where a man can let his voice ring free? Well it means no more rub-a-dub, three liberals in a tub, no more=============== anything. Let freedome ring, let freedome sing. Can't we all just get along? TIA

Please continue...

[Anonymous]

When your cold, dont be afraid to be bold
When your hot, dont legalize pot
When your tired, be careful you might get fired
When your woke, stop acting like you had a stroke.

American Truth --------- Through The Roof!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was simply trying to educate you all on the reality being perpetuated on you by the assembly of witches and warlocks that is the MSM. Liberal eliters right now are shaking there boots over what is happening in my America as President Trump cleans the swamp of all unatural life in favor of God's light and the good things it will bring. What does all this mean to goof people of the outer rings of most liberal cities and ones where a man can let his voice ring free? Well it means no more rub-a-dub, three liberals in a tub, no more=============== anything. Let freedome ring, let freedome sing. Can't we all just get along? TIA

I want to become one of the goof people and let ye olde freedome ring and sing!

--a liberal eliter in a tub

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.

THat didn't seem to bother liberals.

You've put too much stock in what conservative pundits like Hannity say.

Let me let you in on a little secret: When they said "unconstitutional" they were just using the word in the same way that a 5 year old would use something like "poopyhead."

"Obama's unconstitutional policies" = "Obama's poopyhead policies."

They referred to the Constitution but there was no Constitutional argument. A constitutionality argument would have and should have been pursued in the courts - but you'll note that virtually none of the things the talking heads declared to be "unconstitutional" were - and that the handful of legal challenges that did go to the courts did not hold up to scrutiny.

What in the hell are you talking about? And, what is your source of news, because you are terribly uninformed.

https://www.cato.org/blog/obamas-abysmal-record-supreme-court

It has the worst record of any modern presidency, whether you count in absolute won-loss – where the solicitor general’s office struggles to get to 50 percent, against a historical norm of 70 percent – or by unanimous losses alone.

While we’re still in the part of the Court’s term before the decisions start flying fast and furiously, I thought I’d present the latest update on where we stand with respect to those unanimous losses, where President Obama doesn’t even get the votes of the two justices he appointed. Here are the stats:

In the first 6.5 years of Obama’s presidency (January 2009 to June 2015), the government lost unanimously at the Supreme Court 23 times, an average of 3.62 cases per year.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/index.html

https://www.myheritage.org/news/unanimous-supreme-court-rules-against-the-obama-administrations-unconstitutional-power-grab/

The Supreme Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Obama administration’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which were conducted while the Senate was formally in session.

The “decision marks the 12th time the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Obama administration on the issue of executive power,” Heritage Foundation legal expert Elizabeth Slattery explains.

LMAO! CATO Institute. Nah, that's not at all a biased source at all. Given they are *literally* on the Koch Brothers' payroll.

And oh, my, 12th ruling? I think Trump had more than a dozen things struck down in just his first couple of months in office, nimrod.

[Anonymous]

The bad lip reading version of Trump’s anthem is a classic.

https://youtu.be/Zo_mpwmashg

Russian TV even mocked Trump for getting the words to the national anthem wrong. The anchors joked that Trump might be singing the Russian anthem. #winning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The bad lip reading version of Trump’s anthem is a classic.

https://youtu.be/Zo_mpwmashg

Russian TV even mocked Trump for getting the words to the national anthem wrong. The anchors joked that Trump might be singing the Russian anthem. #winning

Omg thank you so much for that video. Perfect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.

THat didn't seem to bother liberals.

You've put too much stock in what conservative pundits like Hannity say.

Let me let you in on a little secret: When they said "unconstitutional" they were just using the word in the same way that a 5 year old would use something like "poopyhead."

"Obama's unconstitutional policies" = "Obama's poopyhead policies."

They referred to the Constitution but there was no Constitutional argument. A constitutionality argument would have and should have been pursued in the courts - but you'll note that virtually none of the things the talking heads declared to be "unconstitutional" were - and that the handful of legal challenges that did go to the courts did not hold up to scrutiny.

What in the hell are you talking about? And, what is your source of news, because you are terribly uninformed.

https://www.cato.org/blog/obamas-abysmal-record-supreme-court

It has the worst record of any modern presidency, whether you count in absolute won-loss – where the solicitor general’s office struggles to get to 50 percent, against a historical norm of 70 percent – or by unanimous losses alone.

While we’re still in the part of the Court’s term before the decisions start flying fast and furiously, I thought I’d present the latest update on where we stand with respect to those unanimous losses, where President Obama doesn’t even get the votes of the two justices he appointed. Here are the stats:

In the first 6.5 years of Obama’s presidency (January 2009 to June 2015), the government lost unanimously at the Supreme Court 23 times, an average of 3.62 cases per year.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/index.html

https://www.myheritage.org/news/unanimous-supreme-court-rules-against-the-obama-administrations-unconstitutional-power-grab/

The Supreme Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Obama administration’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which were conducted while the Senate was formally in session.

The “decision marks the 12th time the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Obama administration on the issue of executive power,” Heritage Foundation legal expert Elizabeth Slattery explains.

LMAO! CATO Institute. Nah, that's not at all a biased source at all. Given they are *literally* on the Koch Brothers' payroll.

And oh, my, 12th ruling? I think Trump had more than a dozen things struck down in just his first couple of months in office, nimrod.

You have offered zero evidence that pp is incorrect. Good job with the name calling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, well, well, looks like a couple of liberal eliters who hate this Land I will call America and that President Trump is now working his fingers to the bone for, have decided to inject theyre liberal snake oil toxins into a true blue American's dream of a brighter today, let alone tomorrow. If President Trump wants to sing his song of empathy to the man on a pedestal, then I say let him join those who value the truth in our soil as much as past templates In Sod We Trust, no that's you. I prefer God. And if you don;t get it, you will have to forget it. TIA>

This is an awesome post. Is it real? I hope so, I love weird shit, so it's really brightened my day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.

Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.

NO, missy, it was not "sarcasm." President Trump Loves This Land (and calls it by it's name, America.) And he loves to sing that love loud, proud and true.

I'm sure this is a biased observation - but have you ever noticed that the people who cheer their love most for the incontinent grifter currently occupying the White House have a real hard time with things like its/it's, their/there/they're and When To Capitalize Words In Accordance With Basic English?

All Your fine education and heirs and graces won't stand in you good stead with the people of the hills and plains. Our values are of a day's pay for a day's work and the pride that comes from a job (or a steak) well done. Wherefore your's are of the a trimphant tomorrow that has yet to come as the Liberal witches and warlocks of the MSM continue to place their Hex upon the Real American People.

Don't stop, oh weird queen of the word salad from the heartland!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Better link to his singing the anthem: https://youtu.be/Zo_mpwmashg

Omg i laffed so hard, thank you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was simply trying to educate you all on the reality being perpetuated on you by the assembly of witches and warlocks that is the MSM. Liberal eliters right now are shaking there boots over what is happening in my America as President Trump cleans the swamp of all unatural life in favor of God's light and the good things it will bring. What does all this mean to goof people of the outer rings of most liberal cities and ones where a man can let his voice ring free? Well it means no more rub-a-dub, three liberals in a tub, no more=============== anything. Let freedome ring, let freedome sing. Can't we all just get along? TIA

Sarah, is that you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.

THat didn't seem to bother liberals.

You've put too much stock in what conservative pundits like Hannity say.

Let me let you in on a little secret: When they said "unconstitutional" they were just using the word in the same way that a 5 year old would use something like "poopyhead."

"Obama's unconstitutional policies" = "Obama's poopyhead policies."

They referred to the Constitution but there was no Constitutional argument. A constitutionality argument would have and should have been pursued in the courts - but you'll note that virtually none of the things the talking heads declared to be "unconstitutional" were - and that the handful of legal challenges that did go to the courts did not hold up to scrutiny.

What in the hell are you talking about? And, what is your source of news, because you are terribly uninformed.

https://www.cato.org/blog/obamas-abysmal-record-supreme-court

It has the worst record of any modern presidency, whether you count in absolute won-loss – where the solicitor general’s office struggles to get to 50 percent, against a historical norm of 70 percent – or by unanimous losses alone.

While we’re still in the part of the Court’s term before the decisions start flying fast and furiously, I thought I’d present the latest update on where we stand with respect to those unanimous losses, where President Obama doesn’t even get the votes of the two justices he appointed. Here are the stats:

In the first 6.5 years of Obama’s presidency (January 2009 to June 2015), the government lost unanimously at the Supreme Court 23 times, an average of 3.62 cases per year.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/index.html

https://www.myheritage.org/news/unanimous-supreme-court-rules-against-the-obama-administrations-unconstitutional-power-grab/

The Supreme Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Obama administration’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which were conducted while the Senate was formally in session.

The “decision marks the 12th time the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Obama administration on the issue of executive power,” Heritage Foundation legal expert Elizabeth Slattery explains.

LMAO! CATO Institute. Nah, that's not at all a biased source at all. Given they are *literally* on the Koch Brothers' payroll.

And oh, my, 12th ruling? I think Trump had more than a dozen things struck down in just his first couple of months in office, nimrod.

You have offered zero evidence that pp is incorrect. Good job with the name calling.

PP has offered little evidence of his own correctness. CATO is not something I would consider an unbiased, legitimate source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was simply trying to educate you all on the reality being perpetuated on you by the assembly of witches and warlocks that is the MSM. Liberal eliters right now are shaking there boots over what is happening in my America as President Trump cleans the swamp of all unatural life in favor of God's light and the good things it will bring. What does all this mean to goof people of the outer rings of most liberal cities and ones where a man can let his voice ring free? Well it means no more rub-a-dub, three liberals in a tub, no more=============== anything. Let freedome ring, let freedome sing. Can't we all just get along? TIA

Don’t taze me, dude. E pluribus unum for eliters. BOGO at Piggly Wiggly. Where’s the beef?