Where did AOC go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AOC = Fascist
AOC= DEI and BLM

+1.

Can AOC even string together a coherent statement. How stupid ARE her constituents?

DP. No. Extremely.

"No." "Extremely."
Ah, so by "coherent statement" your basis of judgement is actually referring to people for whom a "coherent statement" is small words and short sentences of only one or two words, like "no" or "extremely" as opposed to what is coherent to someone who is sober and actually finished high school and beyond. Now it makes sense, kind of how it "makes sense" that Trump supporters think Donald makes coherent statements.

Sweetie, you’re just a waste of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't really get the AOC obsession.

The right has far more extreme, very embarrassing nut jobs.

big breasts.

[Anonymous]

This is a pretty good troll thread.

[Anonymous]

I would have thought we'd find AOC at the border in her pristine white ensemble and red lipstick, crying big crocodile tears for her camera crew. But no... she seems completely disinterested in this border crisis. I wonder why that is?

[Anonymous]

Without AOC’s very pointed questioning of Michael Cohen, Trump’s fraud would probably have continued to fly under the radar. And now Trump has been found guilty of fraud and owes $355 million dollars. That’s where AOC has gone; she has shown she’s not the flitting girly the right tried to portray her as and now the right wing is mad at her for it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-questioning-led-to-trump-fraud-verdict-2024-2?r=US&IR=T

[Anonymous]

For those of you who think AOC is irrelevant when it comes to policy.......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think AOC is irrelevant when it comes to policy.......

Encouraging the next generation. I like it.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who dismisses AOC hasn’t done their HW. She is great @ oversight and she is deft at using social media to explain policy to people who are not enmeshed in that world.

I’ve watched a lot of hearings over the years as well as prepped lawmakers and witnesses for them. She is very good. Ask Trump. Oh, you can’t because he is in court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It used to be the case they every move and every tweet she made would sent Republicans into a tizzy. Did everyone just get bored of her? Is she actually being a legislator now instead of an influencer?

AOC positions have changed... She now lines up with the uniparty.

This. She is mainstream and establishment now.

[Anonymous]

She will run for President one day. If she doesn't, she'll be a VP pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will run for President one day. If she doesn't, she'll be a VP pick.

And that ticket will lose. She is the new Hillary in terms of a large segment of voters outside her district disliking her. I'd be surprised if she could be elected NY senator let alone win over enough electoral votes on top of the ticket. No one is picking her as a VP because Democrats will never need NY to win the executive branch. As Nancy put it, a glass of water with a D behind it could win there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It used to be the case they every move and every tweet she made would sent Republicans into a tizzy. Did everyone just get bored of her? Is she actually being a legislator now instead of an influencer?

AOC positions have changed... She now lines up with the uniparty.

This. She is mainstream and establishment now.

Such a ridiculous comment. Her values haven’t changed. She’s learning how best to get those turned into policy because that is why she’s in Congress- to enact policies. Not to get clicks and $.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will run for President one day. If she doesn't, she'll be a VP pick.

And that ticket will lose. She is the new Hillary in terms of a large segment of voters outside her district disliking her. I'd be surprised if she could be elected NY senator let alone win over enough electoral votes on top of the ticket. No one is picking her as a VP because Democrats will never need NY to win the executive branch. As Nancy put it, a glass of water with a D behind it could win there.

For all the talk about the importance of the VP candidate's home state, it hasn't mattered much recently. Bush would have won Wyoming without Cheney. Obama would have won Delaware without Biden. Trump would have won Indiana without Pence. Biden would have won California without Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will run for President one day. If she doesn't, she'll be a VP pick.

Great! Hope she's the VP! Perfect choice!