I'm a rationale conservative - can you convince me voting rights legislation is needed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Every time this thread gets bumped I think how stubbornly dumb OP is. Not that he is dumb, but that he chooses to be dumb.

[Anonymous]

If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

Listen to her words.
Not controversial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

Having attorneys in all of these major polling locations.... we can't wait to litigate weeks after they happen.....
We need people to hit the ground running.

What is controversial about this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

Having attorneys in all of these major polling locations.... we can't wait to litigate weeks after they happen.....
We need people to hit the ground running.

What is controversial about this?

First, is that the direct quote? Just looking for quotes and a source. And second - yeah, russkie, having attorneys at polling locations is indeed pretty controversial. The hell is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

Having attorneys in all of these major polling locations.... we can't wait to litigate weeks after they happen.....
We need people to hit the ground running.

What is controversial about this?

First, is that the direct quote? Just looking for quotes and a source. And second - yeah, russkie, having attorneys at polling locations is indeed pretty controversial. The hell is wrong with you?

Me again. Have you figured out what’s wrong with having attorneys waiting to pounce at election sites and how that’s effectively intimidation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you can't win on ideas, win on voter intimidation.

See.... here is the problem with the Biden Harris X postings....
They either clip videos to make them seem controversial, or they take words out of context and put them in the posting to appear controversial.
They assume people will not either find the full clip OR that they won't look at the video at all.
There is absolutely NOTHING controversial about what Lara said. She is exactly right.

So find a transcript and provide the context in which what she says is appropriate, but please bear in mind that she has already promised four years of retribution if Trump gets back in, so you can see why people assume violent intentions from the nepotist’s mouth.

Having attorneys in all of these major polling locations.... we can't wait to litigate weeks after they happen.....
We need people to hit the ground running.

What is controversial about this?

First, is that the direct quote? Just looking for quotes and a source. And second - yeah, russkie, having attorneys at polling locations is indeed pretty controversial. The hell is wrong with you?

Gppd grief. Have you listened to the video? I pulled quotes from that. It is linked above in the X posting.
Having attorneys at the ready is NOT controversial. What the hell is wrong with YOU?

Thousands of lawyers from both presidential campaigns will enter polling places next Tuesday with one central goal: tracking their opponents and, if need be, initiating legal action. It will be a kind of Spy vs. Spy.

The lawyers will note how poll workers behave, where voters are directed, if intimidation appears to be occurring, whether lines are long. And they will report up a chain of command where decisions over court action will be made at headquarters in Chicago and Boston.

This will go on in every battleground state — including Wisconsin, Virginia, Florida, even Pennsylvania — but it will be most focused in Ohio and especially in Greater Cleveland, which is heavily Democratic and where many people believe history teaches a simple lesson: the more votes cast here, the likelier President Obama is to win.

As the persuasion effort winds down, campaigns are focused on getting their supporters to vote and getting those votes counted.

The result has been a mass mobilization of lawyers. The Democrats will have 600 lawyers in action here in Cuyahoga County and 2,500 across the state, their organizers say. They have been holding training sessions, grouping legal volunteers into workers and supervisors. The Republicans have much smaller teams — about 70 in this county — and will rely more on surrogates, including nonlawyer poll workers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/us/politics/campaigns-brace-to-sue-for-votes-in-crucial-states.html