Harvey Weinstein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His NY Conviction was just overturned. He's going to get a new trial.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/harvey-weinsteins-rape-conviction-overturned-rcna149328

He's still convicted in California though, so that still stands. But his lawyers are working on getting that one overturned as well.

Makes me ill.

[Anonymous]

Appeals court disagreed with letting in his prior bad acts

[Anonymous]

Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

A position of power? These were all wanna be actresses, striving for movie star roles, not hungry women desperate to feed their children with no other options. Nobody forced them to have sex with him. They did so willingly and then he didn’t give them the roles they thought they deserved to get for sleeping with him. There was a lot of disgusting behavior, on all sides, but no criminality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

A position of power? These were all wanna be actresses, striving for movie star roles, not hungry women desperate to feed their children with no other options. Nobody forced them to have sex with him. They did so willingly and then he didn’t give them the roles they thought they deserved to get for sleeping with him. There was a lot of disgusting behavior, on all sides, but no criminality.

+1

[Anonymous]

It's no different than Hugh Hefner and Playboy, yet we don't really drag him through the mud. (Gross) tale as old as time, I guess.

He really died at the opportune moment, didn't he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

A position of power? These were all wanna be actresses, striving for movie star roles, not hungry women desperate to feed their children with no other options. Nobody forced them to have sex with him. They did so willingly and then he didn’t give them the roles they thought they deserved to get for sleeping with him. There was a lot of disgusting behavior, on all sides, but no criminality.

Even the children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

It’s not illegal to sleep with your boss. Stop being ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

It is illegal to sexually assault someone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

It’s not illegal to sleep with your boss. Stop being ridiculous.

It is if it’s contingent on getting job or not getting fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's no different than Hugh Hefner and Playboy, yet we don't really drag him through the mud. (Gross) tale as old as time, I guess.

He really died at the opportune moment, didn't he?

OMG, you need to do your research. A&E has made a great multi episode series depicting how horrible he was, they rerun it frequently, well worth watching. It's also been shown on Vice, who do a great job of airing horrible behavior by many who escape it while living.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

It’s not illegal to sleep with your boss. Stop being ridiculous.

It is if it’s contingent on getting job or not getting fired.

I'm fairly open minded, but I'd never sleep with someone for a job. I wouldn't sleep with someone to save my job either.

[Anonymous]

Clearly Harvey still has plenty of money to buy the best lawyers.
I wish he would rot somewhere hot but recognize that justice comes with a price tag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. You shouldn’t get convicted for sleazy consensual sex for work favors. Those women knew exactly what they were doing and are upset it didn’t go their way. I feel sorry for the women whose careers have been ruined when they didn’t put out, not the ones who did and then complained about it later. They are just as guilty as Weinstein.

no, he was in a position of power and exploited it. He SHOULD be convicted.

It’s not illegal to sleep with your boss. Stop being ridiculous.

It is if it’s contingent on getting job or not getting fired.

I'm fairly open minded, but I'd never sleep with someone for a job. I wouldn't sleep with someone to save my job either.

Good for you. That doesn't change the illegality of a boss requiring sex for job favors.