“The Mansion Murders” podcast

[Anonymous]

Saw this podcast about the Savopoulos family and Veralicia Figueroa murders posted in another thread and thought people would be interested to listen along.

https://player.fm/series/the-mansion-murders

[Anonymous]

Thx! Will check this out.

[Anonymous]

Who did it? Do they know DC, or have any other inside info?

Thanks for the info, will def check it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who did it? Do they know DC, or have any other inside info?

Thanks for the info, will def check it out.

Just listened to the preview. Sounds like it will be pretty good with some interesting interviews, including Wint's family.

[Anonymous]

Huh, it's Fox5, and Sarah Fraser. Good for Fox5 for getting into the podcast game. Not a fan of Hey Frase, though, so we'll see how this goes. I'll definitely listen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Huh, it's Fox5, and Sarah Fraser. Good for Fox5 for getting into the podcast game. Not a fan of Hey Frase, though, so we'll see how this goes. I'll definitely listen.

Why don't you like Sarah?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huh, it's Fox5, and Sarah Fraser. Good for Fox5 for getting into the podcast game. Not a fan of Hey Frase, though, so we'll see how this goes. I'll definitely listen.

Why don't you like Sarah?

I don't know. It's not that I don't like her, I'm just not a huge fan. To be honest, the constant snarky DCUM gossip about everyone and anyone associated with the 99.5 morning show has made me not a fan of all of them. I don't even know that much about them. i sort of liked her fine on the Kane show. Then she leaves there to pursue her dream to move to NY and have a talk show. Next thing I know, she's back in DC, she's on Fox5, then she has the hey frase podcast and brings on sammy and they talk bad about Kane.....I don't know, there's just something sour grapes about it. It's not fair, because I know nothing about her, but I just have this feeling that she couldn't cut it in NY and so comes home to DC and takes her frustration out of people who helped her in the past. I've seen her a couple of times on Fox5 and she seems to have on too much makeup and a tad too try hard. Again, I have no idea at all, and it's not like I dislike her, it's just more accurate to say I'm not a huge fan. It's not like I think, oh, wow, Sarah Fraser is doing a podcast on this horrible murder, I bet she will do an awesome job and I have to check it out. It's more like, oh, there's a podcast about this horrible murder, hmm, it's done by Sarah Fraser, hmm, well I'll definitely check it out because I am very interested in the case and I really hope she does a good job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huh, it's Fox5, and Sarah Fraser. Good for Fox5 for getting into the podcast game. Not a fan of Hey Frase, though, so we'll see how this goes. I'll definitely listen.

Why don't you like Sarah?

I don't know. It's not that I don't like her, I'm just not a huge fan. To be honest, the constant snarky DCUM gossip about everyone and anyone associated with the 99.5 morning show has made me not a fan of all of them. I don't even know that much about them. i sort of liked her fine on the Kane show. Then she leaves there to pursue her dream to move to NY and have a talk show. Next thing I know, she's back in DC, she's on Fox5, then she has the hey frase podcast and brings on sammy and they talk bad about Kane.....I don't know, there's just something sour grapes about it. It's not fair, because I know nothing about her, but I just have this feeling that she couldn't cut it in NY and so comes home to DC and takes her frustration out of people who helped her in the past. I've seen her a couple of times on Fox5 and she seems to have on too much makeup and a tad too try hard. Again, I have no idea at all, and it's not like I dislike her, it's just more accurate to say I'm not a huge fan. It's not like I think, oh, wow, Sarah Fraser is doing a podcast on this horrible murder, I bet she will do an awesome job and I have to check it out. It's more like, oh, there's a podcast about this horrible murder, hmm, it's done by Sarah Fraser, hmm, well I'll definitely check it out because I am very interested in the case and I really hope she does a good job.

Wow thanks so much for the kind reply. I like her but I can see why some dont

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who did it? Do they know DC, or have any other inside info?

Thanks for the info, will def check it out.

You and the OP are gross. This local family and the woman who worked for them have family and friends still in the area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did it? Do they know DC, or have any other inside info?

Thanks for the info, will def check it out.

You and the OP are gross. This local family and the woman who worked for them have family and friends still in the area.

WHat in the world? If you listen to any true crime podcasts you will find that by doing a podcast a lot of new information turns up and many are solved. This is a devastating crime with a lot of unanswered questions. Not only for the public but for the families involved.

That said I listened to the first one and there was a ton of Fox5 self promotion. But lie Up and Vanished which started out the same way I hope they figure it out and stop with that.

[Anonymous]

OK, well, skipping over the person who thinks we're awful people.....

I listened to the promo for the show today and found it off-putting. For one thing, she referred to Went as "a major character in the story." Or, you know, a murderer in a horrific case. Or to be more accurate, a suspected murderer. He's not a character in a story.

I listen to a fair amount of true crime podcasts. I think there is a lot to learn from true crime and the best podcasts manage to tell a coherent, compelling story that not only bears witness to a horrible crime, but also illustrates larger points in society. I'm thinking of who killed Alberta Williams, about an area in Canada where many many indigenous women have been found murdered. Or even Serial season 1 which may have been a wrongful conviction, or Up and Vanished which may have brought enough attention to a cold case to actually solve the case. Or Accused, which focused on false confessions, and the lack of progress in a cold case once the initial suspect was (rightly) found not guilty of murder, despite his (false) confession.

I think most of the better true crime podcasts come from existing media outlets, like Alberta Williams, or Breakdown from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, Accused from a Cincinnati newspaper, etc.

In fact, I just started listening to Dirty John today and that was done by the LA Times, I think. The bottom line is writing is what really distinguishes a good podcast. And the writing on the promo was.....not good. It sounded like Sarah Fraser just prattling on about interesting characters. Not a compelling, serious look into an open investigation.

Breakdown from the Atlanta Journal Constitution is one of the few I can think of that did the podcast before (and during) the trail (for season 2). I think it is a very tricky, nuanced path to walk before the investigation is concluded and the trial is over. Based on the promo, I am skeptical of the podcast. But I will listen because i think this is an important case and needs more attention.

[Anonymous]

Listening to it now. The host is kind of annoying

[Anonymous]

Ok, caught up on it all. Can't say it is that revealing. The host has toned down the FOX5 promo but can't say she is actually revealing anything or doing anything more than interviewing people who already reported on the case.

Overall it is pretty lame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, well, skipping over the person who thinks we're awful people.....

I listened to the promo for the show today and found it off-putting. For one thing, she referred to Went as "a major character in the story." Or, you know, a murderer in a horrific case. Or to be more accurate, a suspected murderer. He's not a character in a story.

I listen to a fair amount of true crime podcasts. I think there is a lot to learn from true crime and the best podcasts manage to tell a coherent, compelling story that not only bears witness to a horrible crime, but also illustrates larger points in society. I'm thinking of who killed Alberta Williams, about an area in Canada where many many indigenous women have been found murdered. Or even Serial season 1 which may have been a wrongful conviction, or Up and Vanished which may have brought enough attention to a cold case to actually solve the case. Or Accused, which focused on false confessions, and the lack of progress in a cold case once the initial suspect was (rightly) found not guilty of murder, despite his (false) confession.

I think most of the better true crime podcasts come from existing media outlets, like Alberta Williams, or Breakdown from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, Accused from a Cincinnati newspaper, etc.

In fact, I just started listening to Dirty John today and that was done by the LA Times, I think. The bottom line is writing is what really distinguishes a good podcast. And the writing on the promo was.....not good. It sounded like Sarah Fraser just prattling on about interesting characters. Not a compelling, serious look into an open investigation.

Breakdown from the Atlanta Journal Constitution is one of the few I can think of that did the podcast before (and during) the trail (for season 2). I think it is a very tricky, nuanced path to walk before the investigation is concluded and the trial is over. Based on the promo, I am skeptical of the podcast. But I will listen because i think this is an important case and needs more attention.

Just to digress for a minute. Someone Knows Something is coming out with two more seasons. I think the CBC does excellent work. Up and Vanished is good and I have liked the shoot off Sworn (skip the first case...zzzzzz). Dirty John was good but not great. Haven't started Breakdown. Thanks for that tip!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, well, skipping over the person who thinks we're awful people.....

I listened to the promo for the show today and found it off-putting. For one thing, she referred to Went as "a major character in the story." Or, you know, a murderer in a horrific case. Or to be more accurate, a suspected murderer. He's not a character in a story.

I listen to a fair amount of true crime podcasts. I think there is a lot to learn from true crime and the best podcasts manage to tell a coherent, compelling story that not only bears witness to a horrible crime, but also illustrates larger points in society. I'm thinking of who killed Alberta Williams, about an area in Canada where many many indigenous women have been found murdered. Or even Serial season 1 which may have been a wrongful conviction, or Up and Vanished which may have brought enough attention to a cold case to actually solve the case. Or Accused, which focused on false confessions, and the lack of progress in a cold case once the initial suspect was (rightly) found not guilty of murder, despite his (false) confession.

I think most of the better true crime podcasts come from existing media outlets, like Alberta Williams, or Breakdown from the Atlantic Journal Constitution, Accused from a Cincinnati newspaper, etc.

In fact, I just started listening to Dirty John today and that was done by the LA Times, I think. The bottom line is writing is what really distinguishes a good podcast. And the writing on the promo was.....not good. It sounded like Sarah Fraser just prattling on about interesting characters. Not a compelling, serious look into an open investigation.

Breakdown from the Atlanta Journal Constitution is one of the few I can think of that did the podcast before (and during) the trail (for season 2). I think it is a very tricky, nuanced path to walk before the investigation is concluded and the trial is over. Based on the promo, I am skeptical of the podcast. But I will listen because i think this is an important case and needs more attention.

I thought it was weird the way that the host was talking about Wint as if there was a possibility he wasn't involved?? I mean he clearly was.

The other thing I thought was interesting was how the host was saying there were things that were "off" about the family. I don't know what that could be referring to because they seemed like a normal family, albeit very very wealthy.