Lordy... they released the tapes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Only drug dealers and mobsters talk about cash."

Lanny Davis should know better than that. They were discussing financing or paying cash.

A significant percentage of Americans purchase real estate by paying cash. Are they all mobsters?

You are confused. The significant portion to whom you are referring, just write a checkout of their bank account. Mobsters bring actual cash to the table.

The middle PP thinks they are being clever and is testing a spin for SHS. In real estate some people refer to the down payment or money the buyer brings to the transaction as “cash,” no matter how the funds are ultimately brought to closing. (And it is usually a wire transfer). So you might be investing “20% cash” in a property, with the rest being a loan. Where you really see this phrasing being used is to refer to an “all cash” transaction— which is usually seen as a good thing, because no lender means less to certainty and easier to close. In real estate, “cash” can mean the non-debt side of the purchase.

That is clearly now how the word cash is being used here. And The middle PP knows it. It makes zero sense to “finance” this transaction, in the sense you borrow money, or pay after time. It would be interesting if Trump had tried to borrow money— it would would open him up to fraud charges and the like. And paying over time Is too uncertain. If they didn’t lock the money and NDa in beforehand, then Trump loses Nd stops making payments. Or wins, and the woman will try to re-negotiate for more, or, well this, actually.

A blackmail transaction, where you do use suitcases full of cash, and which is basically what this is, is so different than from a commercial real estate transaction.

I think Trumpkins’ Fox News talking points are to somehow turn Trump’s “cash”. statement into something—anything—— else. Remeber— don’t believe what you hear me on tape saying. “Cash” doesn’t mean cash, we have always been at was with Eastasia. I mean Eastasia. Etc. it’s a bad argument. But it might be all they have. Expect SHS to try it out this afternoon.

PS. Someone is holding Trump’s Twitter account hostage this am. Still conspiracy theories. But saner and with better spelling and grammar.

Maybe a tranc. Dart?

[Anonymous]

In the immigration debate, the #MAGA crowd frequently declares their unshakeable commitment to doing things *legally* with harsh consequences for breaking the law, up to and including having your kids taken from you. Obviously their wrath at Trump if he broke campaign finance laws will be harsh.

Or, you know, they're racists who are hiding their distaste for brown people with that fig leaf about legal versus illegal immigration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Only drug dealers and mobsters talk about cash."

Lanny Davis should know better than that. They were discussing financing or paying cash.

A significant percentage of Americans purchase real estate by paying cash. Are they all mobsters?

You are confused. The significant portion to whom you are referring, just write a checkout of their bank account. Mobsters bring actual cash to the table.

The middle PP thinks they are being clever and is testing a spin for SHS. In real estate some people refer to the down payment or money the buyer brings to the transaction as “cash,” no matter how the funds are ultimately brought to closing. (And it is usually a wire transfer). So you might be investing “20% cash” in a property, with the rest being a loan. Where you really see this phrasing being used is to refer to an “all cash” transaction— which is usually seen as a good thing, because no lender means less to certainty and easier to close. In real estate, “cash” can mean the non-debt side of the purchase.

That is clearly now how the word cash is being used here. And The middle PP knows it. It makes zero sense to “finance” this transaction, in the sense you borrow money, or pay after time. It would be interesting if Trump had tried to borrow money— it would would open him up to fraud charges and the like. And paying over time Is too uncertain. If they didn’t lock the money and NDa in beforehand, then Trump loses Nd stops making payments. Or wins, and the woman will try to re-negotiate for more, or, well this, actually.

A blackmail transaction, where you do use suitcases full of cash, and which is basically what this is, is so different than from a commercial real estate transaction.

I think Trumpkins’ Fox News talking points are to somehow turn Trump’s “cash”. statement into something—anything—— else. Remeber— don’t believe what you hear me on tape saying. “Cash” doesn’t mean cash, we have always been at was with Eastasia. I mean Eastasia. Etc. it’s a bad argument. But it might be all they have. Expect SHS to try it out this afternoon.

PS. Someone is holding Trump’s Twitter account hostage this am. Still conspiracy theories. But saner and with better spelling and grammar.

Maybe a tranc. Dart?

The Trump Organization is in deep on this because Cohen says on the tape that Allen Weisselberg knows all about the payoff to McDougall and its financing. Weisselberg is the CFO of the Trump Org.

[Anonymous]

I was the one on the other pre-tape release thread who said that I had heard that Trump wasn’t on these tapes.

I’m really, really glad I was wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats to evangelical pastors Mark Burns and Darrell Scott for getting name-checked on the Trump-Cohen tape as people the campaign might "use" again in the future, as soon as Cohen paid hush money to Trump's Playboy model mistress.

Ah, the great givers of mulligans.

They have a bottomless pit of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This tape is more evidence that @realDonaldTrump himself was directly involved in a campaign finance law violation. And because the amount exceeded $25,000, it would be punishable as a felony.
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1021929626514403329
#TrumpTapes also show Rudy Giuliani lied. But that's not news.

He used campaign funds? Paperwork please? I assume you have it, given the accusation.

Money used to cover up something damaging to a candidate two months before an election is considered campaign funds no matter where the cash or check comes from. See John Edwards.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/04/why-the-john-edwards-trial-is-a-bigger-deal-than-you-think/255749/

Which is ironic given that

1. it was the National Enquirer that broke that story
2. Trump and the owner of the paper are pals
3. Trump thought the National Enquirer should've gotten a pulitzer for that story

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of this would have changed how people voted. They voted for him because he promised to put a conservative judge on the bench and he did that. He gave them exactly what they wanted.

And guess, what? Their votes paid in dividends, he's going to get to appoint another conservative judge locking up the supreme court for decades.

They don't care what happens after this point. He accomplished exactly what they wanted.

ie, they sold their souls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congrats to evangelical pastors Mark Burns and Darrell Scott for getting name-checked on the Trump-Cohen tape as people the campaign might "use" again in the future, as soon as Cohen paid hush money to Trump's Playboy model mistress.

Ah, the great givers of mulligans.

They have a bottomless pit of them.

Just for GOP dirtbag men. Women, minorities, and Democrats need not apply. And if you’re black or foreign born, forget about it. You once took an extra But o Honey when your gran only offered you one? You are a thief and you deserve whatever extra legal justice vigilante men deem fit for you!

[Anonymous]

To the multiple posters suggesting this wouldn’t have changed votes or the outcome

1) you don’t know that

2) that really isn’t the point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this information had come out in a timely basis before the election, Trump would not have won. At that time, there were independents and evangelicals who would not have supported what is obvious crime and cover-up.

Even without Russia Trump is an illegitimate president. With Russia, Trump is a traitorous illegitimate president.

BS

But her emails, remember?

If grab em by the pussy was ok, I don’t see much that could damage him in the minds of the morons who voted for him.

Yep. Proof of a crime such as campaign finance fraud wouldn't have changed the mind of anyone in my family who voted for him to vote for Hillary. Although they might have simply stayed home, which would have given the presidency to Clinton.

Who knows what would have happened. All we know is that this grifting loudmouth moron won. And now we need to GOTV to make sure it doesn't happen again.

[Anonymous]

I still think the conversation Trump was having with Pam Biondi at the top of the tape is more incriminating than the sex hush money part.

[Anonymous]

What happened in Charleston?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still think the conversation Trump was having with Pam Biondi at the top of the tape is more incriminating than the sex hush money part.

None of it is good. And I think it's pretty clear there are more tapes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Only drug dealers and mobsters talk about cash."

Lanny Davis should know better than that. They were discussing financing or paying cash.

A significant percentage of Americans purchase real estate by paying cash. Are they all mobsters?

You are confused. The significant portion to whom you are referring, just write a checkout of their bank account. Mobsters bring actual cash to the table.

You are the one who is confused. In real estate, all cash buyer means no financing involved. Buyers are responsible for the payment out of their own funds at closing. Cash here means the opposite of credit (financing).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Only drug dealers and mobsters talk about cash."

Lanny Davis should know better than that. They were discussing financing or paying cash.

A significant percentage of Americans purchase real estate by paying cash. Are they all mobsters?

You are confused. The significant portion to whom you are referring, just write a checkout of their bank account. Mobsters bring actual cash to the table.

You are the one who is confused. In real estate, all cash buyer means no financing involved. Buyers are responsible for the payment out of their own funds at closing. Cash here means the opposite of credit (financing).

DP.
Cohen says something about financing the "information"
Trump says financing, what financing
Cohen starts to say something and trump says "Cash?"
Cohen says no no no, a check.

How could "cash" mean a bank check and not dolla dolla bills, when he says "Cash" and the other says "No, a check"?